These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 760724)

  • 21. On the calibration of two commercially recorded versions of CID auditory test W-22.
    Gengel RW; Kupperman GL
    Ear Hear; 1980; 1(4):229-31. PubMed ID: 7409362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Pupil response as an indication of effortful listening: the influence of sentence intelligibility.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
    Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):480-90. PubMed ID: 20588118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Speech Understanding in Children With Normal Hearing: Sound Field Normative Data for BabyBio, BKB-SIN, and QuickSIN.
    Holder JT; Sheffield SW; Gifford RH
    Otol Neurotol; 2016 Feb; 37(2):e50-5. PubMed ID: 26756155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A Swedish version of the Hearing In Noise Test (HINT) for measurement of speech recognition.
    Hällgren M; Larsby B; Arlinger S
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Apr; 45(4):227-37. PubMed ID: 16684704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Speech-reception threshold for sentences as a function of age and noise level.
    Plomp R; Mimpen AM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1979 Nov; 66(5):1333-42. PubMed ID: 500971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Polish sentence matrix test for speech intelligibility measurement in noise.
    Ozimek E; Warzybok A; Kutzner D
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Jun; 49(6):444-54. PubMed ID: 20482292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The development and evaluation of the Finnish Matrix Sentence Test for speech intelligibility assessment.
    Dietz A; Buschermöhle M; Aarnisalo AA; Vanhanen A; Hyyrynen T; Aaltonen O; Löppönen H; Zokoll MA; Kollmeier B
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2014 Jul; 134(7):728-37. PubMed ID: 24807850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Investigation of a matrix sentence test in noise: reproducibility and discrimination function in cochlear implant patients.
    Hey M; Hocke T; Hedderich J; Müller-Deile J
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Dec; 53(12):895-902. PubMed ID: 25140602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Design, optimization and evaluation of a Danish sentence test in noise.
    Wagener K; Josvassen JL; Ardenkjaer R
    Int J Audiol; 2003 Jan; 42(1):10-7. PubMed ID: 12564511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Reliability of the TIP and DIP speech-hearing tests for children.
    Siegenthaler BM
    J Commun Disord; 1975 Dec; 8(4):325-33. PubMed ID: 803155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Development of the Russian matrix sentence test.
    Warzybok A; Zokoll M; Wardenga N; Ozimek E; Boboshko M; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():35-43. PubMed ID: 25843088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The effect of varying the slope of the amplitude-frequency response on the masked speech-reception threshold of sentences.
    van Dijkhuizen JN; Anema PC; Plomp R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Feb; 81(2):465-9. PubMed ID: 3558964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Do you hear the noise? The German matrix sentence test with a fixed noise level in subjects with normal hearing and hearing impairment.
    Wardenga N; Batsoulis C; Wagener KC; Brand T; Lenarz T; Maier H
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():71-9. PubMed ID: 26555195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evidence-based occupational hearing screening II: validation of a screening methodology using measures of functional hearing ability.
    Soli SD; Amano-Kusumoto A; Clavier O; Wilbur J; Casto K; Freed D; Laroche C; Vaillancourt V; Giguère C; Dreschler WA; Rhebergen KS
    Int J Audiol; 2018 May; 57(5):323-334. PubMed ID: 29668374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Development of a Dutch matrix sentence test to assess speech intelligibility in noise.
    Houben R; Koopman J; Luts H; Wagener KC; van Wieringen A; Verschuure H; Dreschler WA
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Oct; 53(10):760-3. PubMed ID: 24959915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A signal-to-noise ratio model for the speech-reception threshold of the hearing impaired.
    Plomp R
    J Speech Hear Res; 1986 Jun; 29(2):146-54. PubMed ID: 3724108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Influence of noise type on speech reception thresholds across four languages measured with matrix sentence tests.
    Hochmuth S; Kollmeier B; Brand T; Jürgens T
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():62-70. PubMed ID: 26097982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Speech-reception threshold in noise with one and two hearing aids.
    Festen JM; Plomp R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Feb; 79(2):465-71. PubMed ID: 3950200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The effect of speechreading on the speech-reception threshold of sentences in noise.
    Middelweerd MJ; Plomp R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Dec; 82(6):2145-7. PubMed ID: 3429736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. An Italian matrix sentence test for the evaluation of speech intelligibility in noise.
    Puglisi GE; Warzybok A; Hochmuth S; Visentin C; Astolfi A; Prodi N; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():44-50. PubMed ID: 26371592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.