These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Major gene control of human body height, weight and BMI in five ethnically different populations. Ginsburg E; Livshits G; Yakovenko K; Kobyliansky E Ann Hum Genet; 1998 Jul; 62(Pt 4):307-22. PubMed ID: 9924609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assortative mating in somatic traits and its consequences. Wolański N Stud Hum Ecol; 1994; 11():73-111. PubMed ID: 7633493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Direct and indirect assortative mating: a multivariate approach to plant flowering schedules. Weis AE J Evol Biol; 2005 May; 18(3):536-46. PubMed ID: 15842483 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A model for the evolution of assortative mating. de Cara MA; Barton NH; Kirkpatrick M Am Nat; 2008 May; 171(5):580-96. PubMed ID: 18419568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The correlation between relatives under assortative malting for an X-linked and autosomal trait. Risch H Ann Hum Genet; 1979 Oct; 43(2):151-65. PubMed ID: 525974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Power of segregation analysis for detection of major gene effects on quantitative traits. Borecki IB; Province MA; Rao DC Genet Epidemiol; 1994; 11(5):409-18. PubMed ID: 7835687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assortative mating by body height and BMI: Finnish twins and their spouses. Silventoinen K; Kaprio J; Lahelma E; Viken RJ; Rose RJ Am J Hum Biol; 2003; 15(5):620-7. PubMed ID: 12953173 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Complex segregation analysis of quantitative dermatoglyphic traits in five Indian populations. Karmakar B; Yakovenko K; Kobyliansky E Ann Hum Biol; 2005; 32(4):445-68. PubMed ID: 16147395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Segregation analysis comparing liability and quantitative trait models for hypertension using the Genetic Analysis Workshop 13 simulated data. Crockford GP; Bishop DT; Barrett JH BMC Genet; 2003 Dec; 4 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S79. PubMed ID: 14975147 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. MCMC-based linkage analysis for complex traits on general pedigrees: multipoint analysis with a two-locus model and a polygenic component. Sung YJ; Thompson EA; Wijsman EM Genet Epidemiol; 2007 Feb; 31(2):103-14. PubMed ID: 17123301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Multivariate and multilocus variance components method, based on structural relationships to assess quantitative trait linkage via SEGPATH. Province MA; Rice TK; Borecki IB; Gu C; Kraja A; Rao DC Genet Epidemiol; 2003 Feb; 24(2):128-38. PubMed ID: 12548674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bivariate familial correlation analysis of quantitative traits by use of estimating equations: application to a familial analysis of the insulin resistance syndrome. Trégouët DA; Herbeth B; Juhan-Vague I; Siest G; Ducimetière P; Tiret L Genet Epidemiol; 1999; 16(1):69-83. PubMed ID: 9915568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. No common major gene for apolipoprotein A-I and HDL3-C levels: evidence from bivariate segregation analysis. Juo SH; Beaty TH; Duffy DL; Coresh J; Kwiterovich PO Genet Epidemiol; 1999; 16(1):54-68. PubMed ID: 9915567 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Commingling and segregation analyses: comparison of results from a simulation study of a quantitative trait. Kwon JM; Boehnke M; Burns TL; Moll PP Genet Epidemiol; 1990; 7(1):57-68. PubMed ID: 2184092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]