132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7607590)
41. Results and consequence of the systematic staging imaging at the time of the breast cancer diagnosis.
Mailliez A; Turpin A; Vennin P; Bonneterre J
Breast; 2013 Aug; 22(4):555. PubMed ID: 23602423
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. [Examples of the usefulness of tumor biological markers in the diagnosis and follow-up of various tumors].
Valladares Y
Rev Esp Oncol; 1985; 32(2):349-61. PubMed ID: 3870478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. [Results of oncologic documentation of the Bavarian after care model].
Thieme C
Gynakol Rundsch; 1991; 31 Suppl 2():17-20. PubMed ID: 1665132
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. Routine imaging studies for the posttreatment surveillance of breast and colorectal carcinoma.
Kagan AR; Steckel RJ
J Clin Oncol; 1991 May; 9(5):837-42. PubMed ID: 2016627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. [Primary malignant tumor of the breast. Monitoring after treatment].
Guastalla JP; Kerbrat P
Presse Med; 1995 Oct; 24(31):1415-7. PubMed ID: 8545327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Influence of early diagnosis on prognosis of recurrent breast cancer.
Stierer M; Rosen HR
Cancer; 1989 Sep; 64(5):1128-31. PubMed ID: 2758386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. [Diagnostic imaging of locoregional recurrence of breast cancer].
de Crombrugghe G
Helv Chir Acta; 1992 May; 59(1):269-71. PubMed ID: 1526840
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. [Follow-up recommendations for patients after curative treatment of invasive breast cancer].
Zuber M; Viehl CT; Güller U; Langer I
Ther Umsch; 2008 Jun; 65(6):319-21. PubMed ID: 18622954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. [Follow-up investigations in colorectal cancer].
Kornek GV; Scheithauer W
Onkologie; 2003 Jun; 26(3):303-7. PubMed ID: 12845218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. [Routine follow-ups of patients with breast cancer].
Edeling CJ
Ugeskr Laeger; 1991 Oct; 153(41):2906-7. PubMed ID: 1949315
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Symptomatology as an indicator of recurrent or metastatic breast cancer.
Winchester DP; Sener SF; Khandekar JD; Oviedo MA; Cunningham MP; Caprini JA; Burkett FE; Scanlon EF
Cancer; 1979 Mar; 43(3):956-60. PubMed ID: 427736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. [Pretherapeutical diagnosis of metastases in carcinoma of the breast (author's transl)].
Sauer R
Rontgenblatter; 1978 Jul; 31(7):405-11. PubMed ID: 694374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. [Value of diagnostic imaging for assessment of unsuccessful treatment of children with neoplastic diseases. Introductory comments based on personal examinations].
Wermeński K; Kopyś-Wiszniewska I
Med Wieku Rozwoj; 2000; 4(2 Suppl 2):103-13. PubMed ID: 11178334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. [Diagnosis of metastasis of breast cancer to the thorax and bones].
Frohberg HD
Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1991 Oct; 85(20):1007-13. PubMed ID: 1776282
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Liver and bone scintigraphy in breast cancer--diagnostic and prognostic tool at time of onset and during follow-up.
Spiessens HH; Uyttenbroeck F; Vanderheyden J
Clin Oncol; 1977 Jun; 3(2):171-6. PubMed ID: 872470
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Incidence and methodologic aspects of the occurrence of liver metastases in recurrent breast cancer.
Kamby C; Dirksen H; Vejborg I; Daugaard S; Guldhammer B; Rossing N; Mouridsen HT
Cancer; 1987 Apr; 59(8):1524-9. PubMed ID: 3545442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. [Importance of bone scintigraphy in the after-care of breast cancer].
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1986 Nov; 111(48):1860-1. PubMed ID: 3023006
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Future trends in lung cancer diagnosis.
Christensen JD; Patz EF
Radiol Clin North Am; 2012 Sep; 50(5):1001-8. PubMed ID: 22974783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. [Conception of programmed and standardized after-care of mammary carcinoma (author's transl)].
Leonhardt A
MMW Munch Med Wochenschr; 1976 Mar; 118(10):297-302. PubMed ID: 177862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. [Rationalization profits of radiographic diagnosis with systematic follow-up DBCG (Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group) programs. 1].
Thomsen HS; Andersen JA; Andersen KW; Axelsson CK; Blichert-Toft M; Dombernowsky P; Hansen M; Krag C; Mouridsen HT; Overgaard M
Ugeskr Laeger; 1991 Aug; 153(33):2270-2. PubMed ID: 1781044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
