These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7607979)

  • 1. The behaviour of the f2-f1 acoustic distortion product: lack of effect of brainstem lesions in anaesthetized guinea pigs.
    Lowe M; Robertson D
    Hear Res; 1995 Mar; 83(1-2):133-41. PubMed ID: 7607979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Time-varying alterations in the f2-f1 DPOAE response to continuous primary stimulation. I: Response characterization and contribution of the olivocochlear efferents.
    Kujawa SG; Fallon M; Bobbin RP
    Hear Res; 1995 May; 85(1-2):142-54. PubMed ID: 7559170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Slow variation of the amplitude of acoustic distortion at f2-f1 in awake rabbits.
    Whitehead ML; Lonsbury-Martin BL; Martin GK
    Hear Res; 1991 Feb; 51(2):293-300. PubMed ID: 2032963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A multifrequency method for determining cochlear efferent activity.
    Luebke AE; Foster PK; Stagner BB
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2002 Mar; 3(1):16-25. PubMed ID: 12083721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of contralateral broad-band noise on acoustic distortion products from the human ear.
    Williams DM; Brown AM
    Hear Res; 1997 Feb; 104(1-2):127-46. PubMed ID: 9119756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Inferior colliculus stimulation causes similar efferent effects on ipsilateral and contralateral cochlear potentials in the guinea pig.
    Zhang W; Dolan DF
    Brain Res; 2006 Apr; 1081(1):138-49. PubMed ID: 16500626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects on cochlear responses of activation of descending pathways from the inferior colliculus.
    Mulders WH; Robertson D
    Hear Res; 2000 Nov; 149(1-2):11-23. PubMed ID: 11033243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Contralateral acoustic stimulation modulates low-frequency biasing of DPOAE: efferent influence on cochlear amplifier operating state?
    Abel C; Wittekindt A; Kössl M
    J Neurophysiol; 2009 May; 101(5):2362-71. PubMed ID: 19279155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Response properties of cochlear efferent neurons: monaural vs. binaural stimulation and the effects of noise.
    Liberman MC
    J Neurophysiol; 1988 Nov; 60(5):1779-98. PubMed ID: 3199181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Acoustic modulation of electrically evoked distortion product otoacoustic emissions in gerbil cochlea.
    Ren T
    Neurosci Lett; 1996 Apr; 207(3):167-70. PubMed ID: 8728476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Distortion product otoacoustic emission (2f1-f2) amplitude as a function of f2/f1 frequency ratio and primary tone level separation in human adults and neonates.
    Abdala C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Dec; 100(6):3726-40. PubMed ID: 8969474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of electrical stimulation of the inferior colliculus on 2f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emissions in anesthetized guinea pigs.
    Popelar J; Mazelová J; Syka J
    Hear Res; 2002 Aug; 170(1-2):116-26. PubMed ID: 12208546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In search of basal distortion product generators.
    Withnell RH; Lodde J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Oct; 120(4):2116-23. PubMed ID: 17069309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Amplitude and phase of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in the guinea pig in an (f1 ,f2) area study.
    Schneider S; Prijs VF; Schoonhoven R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Jun; 113(6):3285-96. PubMed ID: 12822801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Influence of the contralateral acoustic stimulation on the acoustic otoemissions: response modulation by the efferent olivocochlear system].
    Morant Ventura A; Marco Algarra J; Caballero Mallea J; Orts Alborch M; Sequi Canet JM; Mir Planas B
    Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp; 1992; 43(5):307-10. PubMed ID: 1492986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Latency of contralateral sound-evoked auditory efferent suppression of otoacoustic emissions.
    Hill JC; Prasher DK; Luxon LM
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1997 May; 117(3):343-51. PubMed ID: 9199519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of upper pontine transections on normal cochlear responses and on the protective effects of contralateral acoustic stimulation in barbiturate-anaesthetized normal-hearing guinea pigs.
    Rajan R
    Hear Res; 1990 Apr; 45(1-2):137-44. PubMed ID: 2345112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of contralateral noise on distortion product latency in humans: is the medial olivocochlear efferent system involved?
    Giraud AL; Wable J; Chays A; Collet L; Chéry-Croze S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Oct; 102(4):2219-27. PubMed ID: 9348679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Age-related shifts in distortion product otoacoustic emissions peak-ratios and amplitude modulation spectra.
    Lai J; Bartlett EL
    Hear Res; 2015 Sep; 327():186-98. PubMed ID: 26232530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Contralateral auditory stimulation alters acoustic distortion products in humans.
    Moulin A; Collet L; Duclaux R
    Hear Res; 1993 Feb; 65(1-2):193-210. PubMed ID: 8458751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.