These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7607995)

  • 1. Alternative pork carcass evaluation techniques: I. Differences in predictions of value.
    Boland MA; Foster KA; Schinckel AP; Wagner J; Chen W; Berg EP; Forrest JC
    J Anim Sci; 1995 Mar; 73(3):637-44. PubMed ID: 7607995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Alternative pork carcass evaluation techniques: II. Statistical analysis of error attributable to sex, genotype, and weight.
    Boland MA; Foster KA; Schinckel AP; Chen W; Wagner J; Berg EP; Forrest JC
    J Anim Sci; 1995 Mar; 73(3):645-50. PubMed ID: 7607996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of alternative techniques to determine pork carcass value.
    Akridge JT; Brorsen BW; Whipker LD; Forrest JC; Kuei CH; Schinckel AP
    J Anim Sci; 1992 Jan; 70(1):18-28. PubMed ID: 1582906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Electromagnetic scanning of pork carcasses in an on-line industrial configuration.
    Berg EP; Forrest JC; Fisher JE
    J Anim Sci; 1994 Oct; 72(10):2642-52. PubMed ID: 7883623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of electronic technology to assess lamb carcass composition.
    Berg EP; Neary MK; Forrest JC; Thomas DL; Kauffman RG
    J Anim Sci; 1997 Sep; 75(9):2433-44. PubMed ID: 9303462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Using current on-line carcass evaluation parameters to estimate boneless and bone-in pork carcass yield as influenced by trim level.
    Berg EP; Grams DW; Miller RK; Wise JW; Forrest JC; Savell JW
    J Anim Sci; 1999 Aug; 77(8):1977-84. PubMed ID: 10461971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the E+V video image analysis system as a predictor of pork carcass meat yield.
    McClure EK; Scanga JA; Belk KE; Smith GC
    J Anim Sci; 2003 May; 81(5):1193-201. PubMed ID: 12772846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biases associated with genotype and sex in prediction of fat-free lean mass and carcass value in hogs.
    Hicks C; Schinckel AP; Forrest JC; Akridge JT; Wagner JR; Chen W
    J Anim Sci; 1998 Sep; 76(9):2221-34. PubMed ID: 9781476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of slaughter weight on growth and carcass characteristics, commercial cutting and curing yields, and meat quality of barrows and gilts from two genotypes.
    Cisneros F; Ellis M; McKeith FK; McCaw J; Fernando RL
    J Anim Sci; 1996 May; 74(5):925-33. PubMed ID: 8726722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of alternative measures of pork carcass composition.
    Schinckel AP; Wagner JR; Forrest JC; Einstein ME
    J Anim Sci; 2001 May; 79(5):1093-119. PubMed ID: 11374529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Genetic parameters for carcass composition and pork quality estimated in a commercial production chain.
    van Wijk HJ; Arts DJ; Matthews JO; Webster M; Ducro BJ; Knol EF
    J Anim Sci; 2005 Feb; 83(2):324-33. PubMed ID: 15644503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of procedures to predict fat-free lean in swine carcasses.
    Johnson RK; Berg EP; Goodwin R; Mabry JW; Miller RK; Robison OW; Sellers H; Tokach MD
    J Anim Sci; 2004 Aug; 82(8):2428-41. PubMed ID: 15318744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Composition analysis of pork carcasses by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry.
    Mitchell AD; Scholz AM; Pursel VG; Evock-Clover CM
    J Anim Sci; 1998 Aug; 76(8):2104-14. PubMed ID: 9734860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The influence of genotype, sex, and dietary lysine on pork subprimal cut yields and carcass quality of pigs fed to either 104 or 127 kilograms.
    Unruh JA; Friesen KG; Stuewe SR; Dunn BL; Nelssen JL; Goodband RD; Tokach MD
    J Anim Sci; 1996 Jun; 74(6):1274-83. PubMed ID: 8791199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pork carcass composition derived from a neural network model of electromagnetic scans.
    Berg EP; Engel BA; Forrest JC
    J Anim Sci; 1998 Jan; 76(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 9464879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Commercial adaptation of ultrasonography to predict pork carcass composition from live animal and carcass measurements.
    Gresham JD; McPeake SR; Bernard JK; Henderson HH
    J Anim Sci; 1992 Mar; 70(3):631-9. PubMed ID: 1563990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of transverse and longitudinal real-time ultrasound scans for prediction of lean cut yields and fat-free lean content in live pigs.
    Cisneros F; Ellis M; Miller KD; Novakofski J; Wilson ER; McKeith FK
    J Anim Sci; 1996 Nov; 74(11):2566-76. PubMed ID: 8923171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The growth performance, carcass characteristics, and meat quality of halothane carrier and negative pigs.
    Leach LM; Ellis M; Sutton DS; McKeith FK; Wilson ER
    J Anim Sci; 1996 May; 74(5):934-43. PubMed ID: 8726723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An evaluation of the lamb vision system as a predictor of lamb carcass red meat yield percentage.
    Brady AS; Belk KE; LeValley SB; Dalsted NL; Scanga JA; Tatum JD; Smith GC
    J Anim Sci; 2003 Jun; 81(6):1488-98. PubMed ID: 12817497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Electromagnetic scanning to predict lamb carcass composition.
    Berg EP; Forrest JC; Thomas DL; Nusbaum N; Kauffman RG
    J Anim Sci; 1994 Jul; 72(7):1728-36. PubMed ID: 7928752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.