BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7610026)

  • 1. [Study of X-ray filter and peak kilovoltage in film-screen chest radiographs in regard to detection of simulated pulmonary nodules: comparison between film-screen combination and FCR].
    Kiyono K; Sone S; Sakai F; Kawai T; Karakida O; Kasuga T; Hirano H; Matsumoto T
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1994 Nov; 54(13):1237-44. PubMed ID: 7610026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Study of X-ray filter and peak kilovoltage in Fuji Computed Radiography in regard to the detection of simulated pulmonary nodules].
    Kiyono K; Sone S; Sakai F; Kawai T; Karakida O; Oguchi K; Kasuga T; Hirano H; Miyasaka T; Matsumoto T
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1994 Oct; 54(12):1126-35. PubMed ID: 9340603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of reduced exposure on computed radiography: comparison of nodule detection accuracy with conventional and asymmetric screen-film radiographs of a chest phantom.
    Kimme-Smith C; Aberle DR; Sayre JW; Hart EM; Greaves SM; Brown K; Young DA; Deseran MD; Johnson T; Johnson SL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Aug; 165(2):269-73. PubMed ID: 7618538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Detection of simulated lung nodules evaluated with various film/screen systems].
    Li-Feng
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1997 Feb; 57(3):104-9. PubMed ID: 9077091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Detection of simulated chest lesions: comparison of a conventional screen-film combination, an asymmetric screen-film system, and storage phosphor radiography.
    Leppert AG; Prokop M; Schaefer-Prokop CM; Galanski M
    Radiology; 1995 Apr; 195(1):259-63. PubMed ID: 7892482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. ROC-analysis of detection performance by analogue and digital plain film systems in chest radiography.
    Müller RD; Wähling S; Hirche H; Voss M; Blendl C; Gocke C; Gocke P; Buddenbrock B; John V; Wiebringhaus R; Turowski B
    Acta Radiol; 1996 Nov; 37(6):847-54. PubMed ID: 8995453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [The use of an asymmetric film-screen combination for the imaging of round pulmonary foci].
    Müller RD; Wähling S; Hirche H; Voss M; Gocke P; Gocke C; Blendl C; Turowski B; Buddenbrock B; John V
    Rofo; 1995 Oct; 163(4):290-6. PubMed ID: 7579214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Pulmonary nodule detection of chest phantom with CRT images--comparison with conventional radiography (film-screen system) and FCR (Fuji Computed Radiography) hardcopy].
    Magota S
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Aug; 49(8):1038-46. PubMed ID: 2594483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improved parameters for unsharp mask filtering of digital chest radiographs.
    Prokop M; Schaefer CM; Oestmann JW; Galanski M
    Radiology; 1993 May; 187(2):521-6. PubMed ID: 8475301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improved pulmonary nodule detection with scanning equalization radiography.
    Wandtke JC; Plewes DB; McFaul JA
    Radiology; 1988 Oct; 169(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 3420264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Detectability of simulated pulmonary nodules on chest radiographs: comparison between irradiation side sampling indirect flat-panel detector and computed radiography.
    Yano Y; Yabuuchi H; Tanaka N; Morishita J; Akasaka T; Matsuo Y; Sunami S; Kamitani T; Jinnouchi M; Yamasaki Y; Nagao M; Sasaki M
    Eur J Radiol; 2013 Nov; 82(11):2050-4. PubMed ID: 23827799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Efficacy of digital radiography for the detection of pneumothorax: comparison with conventional chest radiography.
    Elam EA; Rehm K; Hillman BJ; Maloney K; Fajardo LL; McNeill K
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Mar; 158(3):509-14. PubMed ID: 1738985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Chest radiography with a digital flat-panel detector: experimental receiver operating characteristic analysis.
    Metz S; Damoser P; Hollweck R; Roggel R; Engelke C; Woertler K; Renger B; Rummeny EJ; Link TM
    Radiology; 2005 Mar; 234(3):776-84. PubMed ID: 15734933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Detectability of simulated nodules on chest phantom by Fuji computed radiography: comparison of different nodule sizes, configurations and tube voltages].
    Li F; Sone S; Kiyono K; Sakai F; Oguchi K; Karakida O; Ito A; Maruyama Y; Hirano H; Miyasaka T; Maruyama F; Iimori S
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1996 Mar; 56(4):160-6. PubMed ID: 8992450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Performance study of teleradiology network systems with CRT monitors: ROC analysis of an observation study of simulated lung nodules].
    Takizawa M; Sone S; Oguchi K; Maruyama Y; Watanabe T; Gomi K; Wako T; Okazaki Y; Momose M; Imai S; Maruyama A; Sakai F
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1996 Dec; 56(14):1061-5. PubMed ID: 9014469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Diagnostic performance of a flat-panel detector at low tube voltage in chest radiography: a phantom study.
    Bernhardt TM; Rapp-Bernhardt U; Lenzen H; Röhl FW; Diederich S; Papke K; Ludwig K; Heindel W
    Invest Radiol; 2004 Feb; 39(2):97-103. PubMed ID: 14734924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison between a screen-film system and a selenium radiography system. An ROC study using simulated thoracic lesions.
    Kotter E; Einert A; Merz C; Allmann KH; Altehoefer C; Ghanem N; Langer M
    Invest Radiol; 1999 Apr; 34(4):296-302. PubMed ID: 10196722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Conventional chest radiography vs dual-energy computed radiography in the detection and characterization of pulmonary nodules.
    Kelcz F; Zink FE; Peppler WW; Kruger DG; Ergun DL; Mistretta CA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Feb; 162(2):271-8. PubMed ID: 8310908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Thoracic radiographs with the AMBER system. A comparison of the diagnostic image quality of film-screen and storage-phosphor radiographs on the grid-partition stand and the AMBER system].
    Busch HP; Hartmann J; Freund MC; Lehmann KJ; Georgi M; Richter K
    Rofo; 1992 Mar; 156(3):241-6. PubMed ID: 1550921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optimal beam quality for chest flat panel detector system: realistic phantom study.
    Kuwahara C; Aoki T; Oda N; Kawabata J; Sugimoto K; Kobayashi M; Fujii M; Korogi Y
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Sep; 29(9):4538-4543. PubMed ID: 30737566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.