These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7610026)

  • 21. Advanced multiple-beam equalization radiography in chest radiology: a simulated nodule detection study.
    Kool LJ; Busscher DL; Vlasbloem H; Hermans J; vd Merwe PC; Algra PR; Herstel W
    Radiology; 1988 Oct; 169(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 3420280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Unsharp masking of low-dosed digital luminescence radiographs: results of a receiver operating characteristics analysis.
    Müller RD; Voss M; Hirche H; Buddenbrock B; John V; Bosch E
    Eur Radiol; 1996; 6(4):526-31. PubMed ID: 8798037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Direct comparison of conventional and computed radiography with a dual-image recording technique.
    MacMahon H; Sanada S; Doi K; Giger M; Xu XW; Yin FF; Montner SM; Carlin M
    Radiographics; 1991 Mar; 11(2):259-68. PubMed ID: 2028063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Advanced multiple beam equalization radiography: receiver operating characteristic comparison with screen-film chest radiography.
    Swensen SJ; Aughenbaugh GL; Brown LR; Harms GF; Karsell PR; Gray JE; Ilstrup DM; Hodge DO
    Mayo Clin Proc; 1998 Jul; 73(7):636-41. PubMed ID: 9663191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Detection of simulated chest lesions with normal and reduced radiation dose: comparison of conventional screen-film radiography and a flat-panel x-ray detector based on amorphous silicon.
    Strotzer M; Gmeinwieser JK; Völk M; Fründ R; Seitz J; Feuerbach S
    Invest Radiol; 1998 Feb; 33(2):98-103. PubMed ID: 9493725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Detection of CT-proved pulmonary nodules: comparison of selenium-based digital and conventional screen-film chest radiographs.
    Woodard PK; Slone RM; Sagel SS; Fleishman MJ; Gutierrez FR; Reiker GG; Pilgram TK; Jost RG
    Radiology; 1998 Dec; 209(3):705-9. PubMed ID: 9844662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Conventional film-screen versus computed storage phosphor radiography. Simulated miliary lung disease in an anthropomorphic phantom.
    Mosser H; Pärtan G; Urban M; Krampla W; Ottes F; Hruby W
    Invest Radiol; 1995 Mar; 30(3):186-91. PubMed ID: 7797418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Optimal beam quality for chest computed radiography.
    Oda N; Nakata H; Murakami S; Terada K; Nakamura K; Yoshida A
    Invest Radiol; 1996 Mar; 31(3):126-31. PubMed ID: 8675419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Chest radiographs obtained with shaped filters: evaluation by observer performance tests.
    Kelsey CA; Lane RG; Moseley RD; Mettler FA; Rosenberg RD; Williams AG; Garcia JF; Feldman BS; Boardman RE
    Radiology; 1986 Jun; 159(3):653-5. PubMed ID: 3704147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Flat-panel x-ray detector based on amorphous silicon versus asymmetric screen-film system: phantom study of dose reduction and depiction of simulated findings.
    Rapp-Bernhardt U; Roehl FW; Gibbs RC; Schmidl H; Krause UW; Bernhardt TM
    Radiology; 2003 May; 227(2):484-92. PubMed ID: 12676965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Mottle on computed radiographs of the chest in pediatric patients.
    Huda W; Slone RM; Belden CJ; Williams JL; Cumming WA; Palmer CK
    Radiology; 1996 Apr; 199(1):249-52. PubMed ID: 8633153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Investigation of optimum X-ray beam tube voltage and filtration for chest radiography with a computed radiography system.
    Moore CS; Beavis AW; Saunderson JR
    Br J Radiol; 2008 Oct; 81(970):771-7. PubMed ID: 18662964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Selenium-based digital radiography of the chest: radiologists' preference compared with film-screen radiographs.
    Floyd CE; Baker JA; Chotas HG; Delong DM; Ravin CE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Dec; 165(6):1353-8. PubMed ID: 7484562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Clinical evaluation of twin screen-film chest radiography: cost effective lung and mediastinal imaging.
    McLean D; Gray JE; Swensen SJ; Vrieze TJ
    Eur J Radiol; 1998 Mar; 27(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 9587769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Optimization of chest films of equalization radiography (advanced multiple beam equalization radiography). Comparison by means of a receiver operating characteristic study of simulated nodular interstitial disease.
    Schultz Kool LJ; van Proosdij M; van Metter R; Vrooman HA; Aarts NJ; Shaw PM; Obermann WR; Heijboer RJ; Memel DS; Oestmann JW
    Invest Radiol; 1994 Dec; 29(12):1020-5. PubMed ID: 7721542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Chest radiography with a shaped filter at 140 kVp: its diagnostic accuracy compared with that of standard radiographs.
    Guilbeau JC; Mazoyer BM; Pruvost P; Verrey B; Grenier P
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 May; 150(5):1007-10. PubMed ID: 3258700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Report on the 90th Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting of the Radiological Society of North America-- Comparison of LCD and CRT monitors for detection of pulmonary nodules and interstitial lung diseases on digital chest radiographs by using receiver operating characteristic analysis].
    Ikeda R; Katsuragawa S; Shimonobou T; Hashida M; Yamashita Y; Doi K
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2005 Jul; 61(7):974-5. PubMed ID: 16049406
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Subtle pulmonary disease: detection with computed radiography versus conventional chest radiography.
    Ishigaki T; Endo T; Ikeda M; Kono M; Yoshida S; Ikezoe J; Murata K; Matsumoto M
    Radiology; 1996 Oct; 201(1):51-60. PubMed ID: 8816520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Digital chest radiography: comparison of unprocessed and processed images in the detection of solitary pulmonary nodules.
    Correa J; Souto M; Tahoces PG; Malagari KS; Tucker DM; Larkin JJ; Kuhlman J; Barnes GT; Zerhouni EA; Fraser RG
    Radiology; 1995 Apr; 195(1):253-8. PubMed ID: 7892481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Performance of various X-ray film/screen systems in demonstrating small simulated low-density lung nodules.
    Maruyama Y
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1998 Aug; 58(9):509-15. PubMed ID: 9778937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.