These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7610116)

  • 61. A cross-sectional study of the radiation dose and image quality of X-ray equipment used in IVR.
    Inaba Y; Chida K; Kobayashi R; Zuguchi M
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 17(4):391-401. PubMed ID: 27455503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Effect of x-ray energy dispersion in digital subtraction imaging at the iodine K-edge--a Monte Carlo study.
    Prino F; Ceballos C; Cabal A; Sarnelli A; Gambaccini M; Ramello L
    Med Phys; 2008 Jan; 35(1):13-24. PubMed ID: 18293556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Monte Carlo analysis of beam blocking grid design parameters: Scatter estimation and the importance of electron backscatter.
    Bootsma GJ; Ren L; Zhang H; Jin JY; Jaffray DA
    Med Phys; 2018 Mar; 45(3):1059-1070. PubMed ID: 29360154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Optimization of contrast-enhanced breast imaging: Analysis using a cascaded linear system model.
    Hu YH; Scaduto DA; Zhao W
    Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 44(1):43-56. PubMed ID: 28044312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Technical Note: Characterization of x-ray beam profiles for a fluoroscopic system incorporating copper filtration.
    Wunderle KA; Godley AR; Shen ZL; Dong FF
    Med Phys; 2019 Nov; 46(11):4918-4922. PubMed ID: 31437308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Mathematical modelling of scanner-specific bowtie filters for Monte Carlo CT dosimetry.
    Kramer R; Cassola VF; Andrade ME; de Araújo MW; Brenner DJ; Khoury HJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Feb; 62(3):781-809. PubMed ID: 28072578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Simultaneous fluoroscopic and nuclear imaging: impact of collimator choice on nuclear image quality.
    van der Velden S; Beijst C; Viergever MA; de Jong HW
    Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 44(1):249-261. PubMed ID: 28044322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Study of a prototype high quantum efficiency thick scintillation crystal video-electronic portal imaging device.
    Samant SS; Gopal A
    Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):2783-91. PubMed ID: 16964854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Towards standardization of x-ray beam filters in digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis: Monte Carlo simulations and analytical modelling.
    Shrestha S; Vedantham S; Karellas A
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Mar; 62(5):1969-1993. PubMed ID: 28075335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. X-ray scatter in megavoltage transmission radiography: physical characteristics and influence on image quality.
    Jaffray DA; Battista JJ; Fenster A; Munro P
    Med Phys; 1994 Jan; 21(1):45-60. PubMed ID: 8164588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Noise reduction in low-dose x-ray fluoroscopy for image-guided radiation therapy.
    Wang J; Zhu L; Xing L
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 Jun; 74(2):637-43. PubMed ID: 19427563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. An assessment of the efficiency of methods for measurement of the computed tomography dose index (CTDI) for cone beam (CBCT) dosimetry by Monte Carlo simulation.
    Abuhaimed A; J Martin C; Sankaralingam M; J Gentle D; McJury M
    Phys Med Biol; 2014 Nov; 59(21):6307-26. PubMed ID: 25295615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Monte Carlo dosimetry modeling of focused kV x-ray radiotherapy of eye diseases with potential nanoparticle dose enhancement.
    Yan H; Ma X; Sun W; Mendez S; Stryker S; Starr-Baier S; Delliturri G; Zhu D; Nath R; Chen Z; Roberts K; MacDonald CA; Liu W
    Med Phys; 2018 Oct; 45(10):4720-4733. PubMed ID: 30133705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Radiation dose reduction in paediatric fluoroscopy using added filtration.
    Nicholson RA; Thornton A; Akpan M
    Br J Radiol; 1995 Mar; 68(807):296-300. PubMed ID: 7735770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. [Conversion coefficients for estimation of effective dose to patients from dose area product during fluoroscopy x-ray examinations].
    Gosch D; Gosch K; Kahn T
    Rofo; 2007 Oct; 179(10):1035-42. PubMed ID: 17879174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Studies of performance of antiscatter grids in digital radiography: effect on signal-to-noise ratio.
    Chan HP; Lam KL; Wu YZ
    Med Phys; 1990; 17(4):655-64. PubMed ID: 2215411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. An investigation of dose changes for therapeutic kilovoltage X-ray beams with underlying lead shielding.
    Hill R; Healy B; Holloway L; Baldock C
    Med Phys; 2007 Jul; 34(7):3045-53. PubMed ID: 17822012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Cone-beam breast computed tomography with a displaced flat panel detector array.
    Mettivier G; Russo P; Lanconelli N; Meo SL
    Med Phys; 2012 May; 39(5):2805-19. PubMed ID: 22559652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Validation of an image simulation technique for two computed radiography systems: an application to neonatal imaging.
    Smans K; Vandenbroucke D; Pauwels H; Struelens L; Vanhavere F; Bosmans H
    Med Phys; 2010 May; 37(5):2092-100. PubMed ID: 20527542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. A comparison between objective and subjective image quality measurements for a full field digital mammography system.
    Marshall NW
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(10):2441-63. PubMed ID: 16675862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.