These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. [A new suture device for continuous sutures in the intestinal tract]. Bertram P; Kuth G; Treutner KH; Schumpelick V; Schlöndorff G Langenbecks Arch Chir; 1994; 379(5):294-8. PubMed ID: 7990625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and hand-sewn intestinal sutured anastomoses performed by residents. Marecik SJ; Chaudhry V; Jan A; Pearl RK; Park JJ; Prasad LM Am J Surg; 2007 Mar; 193(3):349-55; discussion 355. PubMed ID: 17320533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of a new vascular suture system for aortic laparoscopic surgery: an experimental study on pigs and cadavers. Millon A; Boufi M; Garitey V; Ramos-Clamote J; Hakam Z; Mouret F; Chevalier JM; Alimi YS Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2008 Jun; 35(6):730-6. PubMed ID: 18261940 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Laparoscopic manual intestinal anastomosis: experimental study in a pig model]. Fritsch S; Fourquier P; Gossot D; Colomer S; Celerier M; Revillon Y Ann Chir; 1998; 52(6):574-7. PubMed ID: 9752510 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Use of 5-mm Laparoscopic Stapler to Perform Open Small Bowel Anastomosis in a Neonatal Animal Model. Glenn IC; Bruns NE; Ponsky TA J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2016 Oct; 26(10):840-844. PubMed ID: 27462959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Resection anastomosis of the small intestine by celioscopy in swine. Comparative experimental study between manual and mechanical anastomosis]. Noël P; Fagot H; Fabre JM; Mann C; Quenet F; Guillon F; Baumel H; Domergue J Ann Chir; 1994; 48(10):921-9. PubMed ID: 7733592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [A new technic for esophago-enteral anastomosis with a mechanical stapler without purse-string sutures]. Liboni A; Mari C; Zamboni P; Uzzau A; Noce L; Bucoliero F; Mele M; Masala C Ann Ital Chir; 1989; 60(2):125-7; discussion 128. PubMed ID: 2683927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of midlevel and upper-level residents performing their first robotic-sutured intestinal anastomosis. Marecik SJ; Prasad LM; Park JJ; Jan A; Chaudhry V Am J Surg; 2008 Mar; 195(3):333-7; discussion 337-8. PubMed ID: 18206847 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Apparatus LPK-25 for esophago-intestinal anastomoses in gastrectomy and proximal resection of stomach]. Kanshin NN; Volenko AV; Kanshin AN; Titiova GP Khirurgiia (Mosk); 1998; (9):69-72. PubMed ID: 9791995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clip migration in clipped intestinal non-perforating anastomosis (CINPA). Holland-Cunz S; Chmelnik M; Romero P; Klein B; Rumstadt B Eur J Pediatr Surg; 2011 Mar; 21(2):103-5. PubMed ID: 21053161 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Use of resorbable suture material in intestinal sutures. Animal experiment studies on swine small intestine in a single and double suture technic]. Müller G; Kieninger G; Fischbach H; Grzeschiuchna CM; Dürr M Tierarztl Prax; 1980; 8(2):261-6. PubMed ID: 6758197 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Comparative study of cicatrization with suture technics in 1 or 2 layers in small intestine anastomosis in adverse conditions. Experimental work in dogs]. Mantovani M; Leonardi LS G E N; 1977; 31(4):391-7. PubMed ID: 97147 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]