These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

76 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7610806)

  • 21. Otoacoustic emission in myasthenia gravis patients and the role of efferent activation.
    Tóth L; Rácz T; Diószeghy P; Répássy G; Lampé I
    Hear Res; 1998 Dec; 126(1-2):123-5. PubMed ID: 9872140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Otoacoustic emissions in an adult with severe hearing loss.
    Prieve BA; Gorga MP; Neely ST
    J Speech Hear Res; 1991 Apr; 34(2):379-85. PubMed ID: 2046362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Influence of auditory stimulation and visual attention on otoacoustic emissions.
    Ferber-Viart C; Duclaux R; Collet L; Guyonnard F
    Physiol Behav; 1995 Jun; 57(6):1075-9. PubMed ID: 7652027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effect of prolonged contralateral acoustic stimulation on transient evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    van Zyl A; Swanepoel D; Hall JW
    Hear Res; 2009 Aug; 254(1-2):77-81. PubMed ID: 19401226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Inferior colliculus stimulation causes similar efferent effects on ipsilateral and contralateral cochlear potentials in the guinea pig.
    Zhang W; Dolan DF
    Brain Res; 2006 Apr; 1081(1):138-49. PubMed ID: 16500626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evaluation of the olivocochlear efferent reflex strength in the susceptibility to temporary hearing deterioration after music exposure in young adults.
    Hannah K; Ingeborg D; Leen M; Annelies B; Birgit P; Freya S; Bart V
    Noise Health; 2014; 16(69):108-15. PubMed ID: 24804715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Age impact on the efferent system activities in cochlear mechanical properties in normal hearing individuals.
    Oliveira JR; Fernandes JC; Costa Filho OA
    Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2009; 75(3):340-4. PubMed ID: 19649481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Structural alteration of hair cells in the contralateral ear resulting from extracochlear electrical stimulation.
    Dodson HC; Walliker JR; Frampton S; Douek EE; Fourcin AJ; Bannister LH
    Nature; 1986 Mar 6-12; 320(6057):65-7. PubMed ID: 3951550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Contralateral suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in guinea-pigs: effects of gentamicin.
    Aran JM; Erre JP; Avan P
    Br J Audiol; 1994; 28(4-5):267-71. PubMed ID: 7735155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Otoacoustic emission and auditory efferent function testing in patients with sensori-neural hearing loss.
    Liang F; Liu C; Liu B
    Chin Med J (Engl); 1997 Feb; 110(2):139-41. PubMed ID: 9594286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Spontaneous otoacoustic emission recordings during contralateral pure-tone activation of medial olivocochlear reflex.
    Bulut E; Öztürk L
    Physiol Int; 2017 Jun; 104(2):171-182. PubMed ID: 28648121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions after vestibular nerve section in chinchillas.
    Murao MS; Bento RF; Sanchez TG; Ribas GC
    Hear Res; 2006 Mar; 213(1-2):43-8. PubMed ID: 16497453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Efferent suppression test--sensitivity and specificity].
    Lisowska G; Namysłowski G; Misiołek M; Scierski W; Orecka B; Czecior E; Dziendziel A
    Otolaryngol Pol; 2008; 62(6):747-54. PubMed ID: 19205524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Contralateral and ipsilateral 'suppression' of evoked otoacoustic emissions at high stimulation rates.
    Thornton AR
    Br J Audiol; 1994; 28(4-5):227-34. PubMed ID: 7735151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Stronger bilateral efferent influences on cochlear biomechanical activity in musicians than in non-musicians.
    Perrot X; Micheyl C; Khalfa S; Collet L
    Neurosci Lett; 1999 Mar; 262(3):167-70. PubMed ID: 10218882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The effects of aging on evoked otoacoustic emissions and efferent suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    Keppler H; Dhooge I; Corthals P; Maes L; D'haenens W; Bockstael A; Philips B; Swinnen F; Vinck B
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2010 Mar; 121(3):359-65. PubMed ID: 20005159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Repeatability of click-evoked otoacoustic emission-based medial olivocochlear efferent assay.
    Mishra SK; Lutman ME
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(6):789-98. PubMed ID: 23739244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Measures of auditory brain-stem responses, distortion product otoacoustic emissions, hair cell loss, and forward masked tuning curves in the waltzing guinea pig.
    Canlon B; Marklund K; Borg E
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Dec; 94(6):3232-43. PubMed ID: 8300958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Acoustic modulation of electrically evoked distortion product otoacoustic emissions in gerbil cochlea.
    Ren T
    Neurosci Lett; 1996 Apr; 207(3):167-70. PubMed ID: 8728476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Otoacoustic emissions--a step closer to understanding cochlear function].
    Komazec Z; Milosević D; Filipović D; Dankuc D
    Med Pregl; 2001; 54(11-12):539-42. PubMed ID: 11921687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.