These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

76 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7610806)

  • 41. Contralateral suppression of distortion product otoacoustic emissions: effect of the primary frequency in Dpgrams.
    Zhang F; Boettcher FA; Sun XM
    Int J Audiol; 2007 Apr; 46(4):187-95. PubMed ID: 17454232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Isoflurane increases amplitude and incidence of evoked and spontaneous otoacoustic emissions.
    Drexl M; Henke J; Kössl M
    Hear Res; 2004 Aug; 194(1-2):135-42. PubMed ID: 15276684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Efferent modulation of hair cell function.
    Rabbitt RD; Brownell WE
    Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2011 Oct; 19(5):376-81. PubMed ID: 22552698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Assessment of medial olivocochlear system function in pre-term and full-term newborns using a rapid test of transient otoacoustic emissions.
    Morlet T; Hamburger A; Kuint J; Ari-Even Roth D; Gartner M; Muchnik C; Collet L; Hildesheimer M
    Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci; 2004 Apr; 29(2):183-90. PubMed ID: 15113308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Corticofugal Modulation of DPOAEs in Gerbils.
    Jäger K; Kössl M
    Hear Res; 2016 Feb; 332():61-72. PubMed ID: 26619750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. [The application of otoacoustic emissions measurement in the assessment of the function of cochlear efferent fibers: the study of normal hearing subjects].
    Kotyło P; Sliwińska-Kowalska M
    Otolaryngol Pol; 1999; 53(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 10337165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. [The study of maturation of the auditory analyzer rabbit according distortion-product otoacoustic emissions].
    D'iakonova IN; Ishanova IuS; Rakhmanova IV
    Vestn Ross Akad Med Nauk; 2013; (11):94-7. PubMed ID: 24640737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Amplitude modulation of DPOAEs by acoustic stimulation of the contralateral ear.
    Harrison RV; Sharma A; Brown T; Jiwani S; James AL
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2008 Apr; 128(4):404-7. PubMed ID: 18368574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Specific findings in distortion product otoacoustic emissions and growth functions with chronic tinnitus.
    Hesse G; Schaaf H; Laubert A
    Int Tinnitus J; 2005; 11(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 16419682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. [A case of preserved otoacoustic emissions in a child with unilateral idiopathic severe sensorineural hearing loss].
    Namysłowski G; Morawski K; Trybalska G
    Otolaryngol Pol; 1999; 53(1):101-5. PubMed ID: 10337167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. [Contralateral suppression of latency during distortion product otoacoustic emissions detection in guinea pigs].
    Kong W; Yang Y; Zhang W
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2001 Aug; 36(4):271-4. PubMed ID: 12761994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The influence of contralateral acoustic stimulation on click-evoked otoacoustic emissions in humans.
    Ryan S; Kemp DT; Hinchcliffe R
    Br J Audiol; 1991 Dec; 25(6):391-7. PubMed ID: 1773199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. [Otoacoustic emission and auditory efferent function testing in normal subjects and patients with sensori-neural hearing loss].
    Liang F; Liu C; Liu B
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1996 Oct; 76(10):763-6. PubMed ID: 9275520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Contralateral acoustic stimulation modulates low-frequency biasing of DPOAE: efferent influence on cochlear amplifier operating state?
    Abel C; Wittekindt A; Kössl M
    J Neurophysiol; 2009 May; 101(5):2362-71. PubMed ID: 19279155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Modulation of auditory percepts by transcutaneous electrical stimulation.
    Ueberfuhr MA; Braun A; Wiegrebe L; Grothe B; Drexl M
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():235-243. PubMed ID: 28323018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. [Specificity and sensitivity of transient click-evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE)].
    Pröschel U; Eysholdt U
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1995 Aug; 74(8):481-8. PubMed ID: 7575899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. [Evaluation of the cochlear efferent system in patients with cerebello-pontine angle tumor].
    Anioł-Borkowska M; Namysłowski G; Lisowska G; Kwiek S; Hajduk A
    Pol Merkur Lekarski; 2005 Sep; 19(111):283-5. PubMed ID: 16358843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Effect of contralateral acoustic stimulation on cochlear tuning measured using stimulus frequency and distortion product OAEs.
    Boothalingam S; Lineton B
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Dec; 51(12):892-9. PubMed ID: 22934932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in neonates and effect of contralateral white noise stimulation.
    Franz B; Altidis P; Altidis B
    Int Tinnitus J; 2000; 6(2):168-71. PubMed ID: 14689637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The role of cholinergic transmission in outer hair cell functioning evaluated by distortion product otoacoustic emissions in myasthenic patients.
    Paludetti G; Di Nardo W; D'Ecclesia A; Evoli A; Scarano E; Di Girolamo S
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2001 Jan; 121(2):119-21. PubMed ID: 11349760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.