BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7612806)

  • 1. Electromagnetic fields and childhood cancer: meta-analysis.
    Feychting M; Ahlbom A
    Cancer Causes Control; 1995 May; 6(3):275-7; discussion 277-9. PubMed ID: 7612806
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Residential proximity to electricity transmission and distribution equipment and risk of childhood leukemia, childhood lymphoma, and childhood nervous system tumors: systematic review, evaluation, and meta-analysis.
    Washburn EP; Orza MJ; Berlin JA; Nicholson WJ; Todd AC; Frumkin H; Chalmers TC
    Cancer Causes Control; 1994 Jul; 5(4):299-309. PubMed ID: 8080941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Scientists continue quest for the link between electromagnetic fields, cancer.
    Polakoff PL
    Occup Health Saf; 1993 Nov; 62(11):32-4. PubMed ID: 8309666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Magnetic fields and childhood cancer--a pooled analysis of two Scandinavian studies.
    Feychting M; Schulgen G; Olsen JH; Ahlbom A
    Eur J Cancer; 1995 Nov; 31A(12):2035-9. PubMed ID: 8562161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Extremely low frequency magnetic fields and cancer.
    Grandolfo M
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 1996 Oct; 5(5):379-81. PubMed ID: 8972264
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Re: "Nighttime exposure to electromagnetic fields and childhood leukemia: an extended pooled analysis".
    O'Carroll MJ; Henshaw D; Ward J; Cohen A
    Am J Epidemiol; 2007 Oct; 166(7):859; author reply 859-60. PubMed ID: 17702971
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comment concerning "Childhood leukemia and residential magnetic fields: are pooled analyses more valid than the original studies?" (Bioelectromagnetics 27:1-7 [2006]).
    Kheifets L; Mezei G; Greenland S
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2006 Dec; 27(8):674-5; discussion 675-6. PubMed ID: 16917870
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Link between electromagnetic fields and childhood cancer unresolved.
    Repacholi MH; Ahlbom A
    Lancet; 1999 Dec; 354(9194):1918-9. PubMed ID: 10622288
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Risk of neoplastic diseases in conditions of exposure to radio- and microwave fields--epidemiologic investigations].
    Szmigielski S; Sobiczewska E
    Med Pr; 2009; 60(5):389-98. PubMed ID: 19999043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Wire codes, magnetic fields, and childhood cancer.
    Kheifets LI; Kavet R; Sussman SS
    Bioelectromagnetics; 1997; 18(2):99-110. PubMed ID: 9084860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. When "wire codes" predict cancer better than spot measurements of magnetic fields.
    Neutra RR; del Pizzo V
    Epidemiology; 1996 May; 7(3):217-8. PubMed ID: 8728430
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Carcinogenic risk of extremely-low-frequency electromagnetic fields: state of the art].
    Pira E; Zanetti C; Saia B
    Med Lav; 1994; 85(6):447-62. PubMed ID: 7731404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [How risky is the relative risk in epidemiologic studies?].
    Irnich W
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 1997; 42 Suppl():107-8. PubMed ID: 9517069
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Epidemiological study of power lines and childhood cancer in the UK: further analyses.
    Bunch KJ; Swanson J; Vincent TJ; Murphy MF
    J Radiol Prot; 2016 Sep; 36(3):437-455. PubMed ID: 27356108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Estimating exposure in studies of residential magnetic fields and cancer: importance of short-term variability, time interval between diagnosis and measurement, and distance to power line.
    Feychting M; Kaune WT; Savitz DA; Ahlbom A
    Epidemiology; 1996 May; 7(3):220-4. PubMed ID: 8728432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Meta-analysis and its application in epidemiology].
    Lu J; Shi L
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 1994 Dec; 15(6):363-7. PubMed ID: 7874708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Simpson's paradox in meta-analysis.
    Hanley JA; Thériault G
    Epidemiology; 2000 Sep; 11(5):613-4. PubMed ID: 10955419
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Transmission lines, EMF and population mixing.
    Jeffers D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 123(3):398-401. PubMed ID: 17110386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The question of health effects from exposure to electromagnetic fields.
    Hendee WR; Boteler JC
    Health Phys; 1994 Feb; 66(2):127-36. PubMed ID: 8282552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Re: "Cancer incidence near radio and television transmitters in Great Britain. I. Sutton Coldfield transmitter; II. All high power transmitters".
    Cooper D; Hemming K; Saunders P
    Am J Epidemiol; 2001 Jan; 153(2):202-4. PubMed ID: 11159167
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.