207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7612901)
1. New modalities in breast imaging: digital mammography and magnetic resonance imaging.
Braeuning MP; Pisano ED
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 1995 Jul; 35(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 7612901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Screening for dense breasts: digital breast tomosynthesis.
Destounis SV; Morgan R; Arieno A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Feb; 204(2):261-4. PubMed ID: 25615747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Emerging technologies in breast cancer detection.
Smith AP; Hall PA; Marcello DM
Radiol Manage; 2004; 26(4):16-24; quiz 25-7. PubMed ID: 15377106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessing tumor extent on contrast-enhanced spectral mammography versus full-field digital mammography and ultrasound.
Patel BK; Garza SA; Eversman S; Lopez-Alvarez Y; Kosiorek H; Pockaj BA
Clin Imaging; 2017; 46():78-84. PubMed ID: 28750354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [How to follow-up women with dense breasts by imaging?].
Tardivon A
J Radiol; 2008 Sep; 89(9 Pt 2):1204-8. PubMed ID: 18772805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Digital breast tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography: comparison of the accuracy of lesion measurement and characterization using specimens.
Seo N; Kim HH; Shin HJ; Cha JH; Kim H; Moon JH; Gong G; Ahn SH; Son BH
Acta Radiol; 2014 Jul; 55(6):661-7. PubMed ID: 24005560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Breast cancer: new technologies for risk assessment and diagnosis.
Wright T; McGechan A
Mol Diagn; 2003; 7(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 14529321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of synthetic mammography, reconstructed from digital breast tomosynthesis, and digital mammography: evaluation of lesion conspicuity and BI-RADS assessment categories.
Mariscotti G; Durando M; Houssami N; Fasciano M; Tagliafico A; Bosco D; Casella C; Bogetti C; Bergamasco L; Fonio P; Gandini G
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Dec; 166(3):765-773. PubMed ID: 28819781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. MR Imaging as an Additional Screening Modality for the Detection of Breast Cancer in Women Aged 50-75 Years with Extremely Dense Breasts: The DENSE Trial Study Design.
Emaus MJ; Bakker MF; Peeters PH; Loo CE; Mann RM; de Jong MD; Bisschops RH; Veltman J; Duvivier KM; Lobbes MB; Pijnappel RM; Karssemeijer N; de Koning HJ; van den Bosch MA; Monninkhof EM; Mali WP; Veldhuis WB; van Gils CH
Radiology; 2015 Nov; 277(2):527-37. PubMed ID: 26110667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Current imaging modalities for the diagnosis of breast cancer.
Edell SL; Eisen MD
Del Med J; 1999 Sep; 71(9):377-82. PubMed ID: 10584437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Imaging of the radiographically dense breast.
Jackson VP; Hendrick RE; Feig SA; Kopans DB
Radiology; 1993 Aug; 188(2):297-301. PubMed ID: 8327668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sensitivity of imaging for multifocal-multicentric breast carcinoma.
Bozzini A; Renne G; Meneghetti L; Bandi G; Santos G; Vento AR; Menna S; Andrighetto S; Viale G; Cassano E; Bellomi M
BMC Cancer; 2008 Sep; 8():275. PubMed ID: 18826585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Analysis of Cost-effectiveness of screening for breast cancer with conventional mammography, digital and magnetic resonance imaging].
Peregrino AA; Vianna CM; de Almeida CE; Gonzáles GB; Machado SC; Costa e Silva FV; Rodrigues MP
Cien Saude Colet; 2012 Jan; 17(1):215-22. PubMed ID: 22218554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Effect of California's Breast Density Notification Legislation on Breast Cancer Screening.
Chau SL; Alabaster A; Luikart K; Brenman LM; Habel LA
J Prim Care Community Health; 2017 Apr; 8(2):55-62. PubMed ID: 27799412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Impact of breast density on computer-aided detection (CAD) of breast cancer].
Yang KY; Liu XJ; Zhai RY
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2012 May; 34(5):360-3. PubMed ID: 22883457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [New trends and novel possibilities in the diagnostic imaging of breast cancer].
Bidlek M; Kovács E; Fehér K; Gõdény M
Magy Onkol; 2015 Mar; 59(1):44-55. PubMed ID: 25763913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative evaluation of breast cancer: a comparative study with mammography and ultrasonography.
Hata T; Takahashi H; Watanabe K; Takahashi M; Taguchi K; Itoh T; Todo S
J Am Coll Surg; 2004 Feb; 198(2):190-7. PubMed ID: 14759774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening.
Pisano ED; Gatsonis C; Hendrick E; Yaffe M; Baum JK; Acharyya S; Conant EF; Fajardo LL; Bassett L; D'Orsi C; Jong R; Rebner M;
N Engl J Med; 2005 Oct; 353(17):1773-83. PubMed ID: 16169887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Breast MRI as an adjunct in the diagnosis of a carcinoma partially obscured on mammography.
Stomper PC; Mazurchuk RV; Tsangaris TN
Clin Imaging; 1994; 18(3):195-8. PubMed ID: 7922840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
