These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7612901)

  • 21. Evidence of the effect of adjunct ultrasound screening in women with mammography-negative dense breasts: interval breast cancers at 1 year follow-up.
    Corsetti V; Houssami N; Ghirardi M; Ferrari A; Speziani M; Bellarosa S; Remida G; Gasparotti C; Galligioni E; Ciatto S
    Eur J Cancer; 2011 May; 47(7):1021-6. PubMed ID: 21211962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Detection of early breast cancer: an overview and future prospects.
    Zhou XH; Gordon R
    Crit Rev Biomed Eng; 1989; 17(3):203-55. PubMed ID: 2673660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Incorporating Imaging Into the Locoregional Management of Breast Cancer.
    Lourenco AP; Mainiero MB
    Semin Radiat Oncol; 2016 Jan; 26(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 26617206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Nonmammographic breast imaging techniques. Current status and future developments.
    Kopans DB
    Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 1987 Sep; 14(3):651-65. PubMed ID: 3323969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Dense breasts: a review of reporting legislation and available supplemental screening options.
    Ho JM; Jafferjee N; Covarrubias GM; Ghesani M; Handler B
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Aug; 203(2):449-56. PubMed ID: 25055284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Clinical evaluation of contrast-enhanced digital mammography and contrast enhanced tomosynthesis--Comparison to contrast-enhanced breast MRI.
    Chou CP; Lewin JM; Chiang CL; Hung BH; Yang TL; Huang JS; Liao JB; Pan HB
    Eur J Radiol; 2015 Dec; 84(12):2501-8. PubMed ID: 26456307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Value of one-view breast tomosynthesis versus two-view mammography in diagnostic workup of women with clinical signs and symptoms and in women recalled from screening.
    Waldherr C; Cerny P; Altermatt HJ; Berclaz G; Ciriolo M; Buser K; Sonnenschein MJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Jan; 200(1):226-31. PubMed ID: 23255766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Mammography screening: A major issue in medicine.
    Autier P; Boniol M
    Eur J Cancer; 2018 Feb; 90():34-62. PubMed ID: 29272783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Tests for breast cancer. Mammography is going digital. But is it better than film?
    Harv Health Lett; 2007 May; 32(7):4-5. PubMed ID: 17575613
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Breast cancer screening and problem solving using mammography, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging.
    Hooley RJ; Andrejeva L; Scoutt LM
    Ultrasound Q; 2011 Mar; 27(1):23-47. PubMed ID: 21343800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Supplemental Screening for Breast Cancer in Women With Dense Breasts: A Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.
    Melnikow J; Fenton JJ; Whitlock EP; Miglioretti DL; Weyrich MS; Thompson JH; Shah K
    Ann Intern Med; 2016 Feb; 164(4):268-78. PubMed ID: 26757021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Emerging techniques and molecular imaging in breast cancer.
    Yang WT
    Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 2011 Aug; 32(4):288-99. PubMed ID: 21782119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Digital breast tomosynthesis and breast ultrasound: Additional roles in dense breasts with category 0 at conventional digital mammography.
    Lee WK; Chung J; Cha ES; Lee JE; Kim JH
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Jan; 85(1):291-296. PubMed ID: 26499000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Impact of full field digital mammography on the classification and mammographic characteristics of interval breast cancers.
    Knox M; O'Brien A; Szabó E; Smith CS; Fenlon HM; McNicholas MM; Flanagan FL
    Eur J Radiol; 2015 Jun; 84(6):1056-61. PubMed ID: 25816990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Breast density and digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Reynolds A
    Radiol Technol; 2013; 85(1):63M-82M; quiz 83M-85M. PubMed ID: 24029897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Mammography and subsequent whole-breast sonography of nonpalpable breast cancers: the importance of radiologic breast density.
    Leconte I; Feger C; Galant C; Berlière M; Berg BV; D'Hoore W; Maldague B
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Jun; 180(6):1675-9. PubMed ID: 12760942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Recent advances in breast cancer imaging.
    Newman J
    Radiol Technol; 1999; 71(1):35-54; quiz 55-7. PubMed ID: 10546286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Contrast-enhanced digital mammography: initial clinical experience.
    Jong RA; Yaffe MJ; Skarpathiotakis M; Shumak RS; Danjoux NM; Gunesekara A; Plewes DB
    Radiology; 2003 Sep; 228(3):842-50. PubMed ID: 12881585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Magnetic resonance imaging and breast ultrasonography as an adjunct to mammographic screening in high-risk patients.
    Le-Petross HT; Shetty MK
    Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 2011 Aug; 32(4):266-72. PubMed ID: 21782116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Screening mammography-detected cancers: sensitivity of a computer-aided detection system applied to full-field digital mammograms.
    Yang SK; Moon WK; Cho N; Park JS; Cha JH; Kim SM; Kim SJ; Im JG
    Radiology; 2007 Jul; 244(1):104-11. PubMed ID: 17507722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.