These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7613423)
1. New German abortion law agreed. Karcher HL BMJ; 1995 Jul; 311(6998):149. PubMed ID: 7613423 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bavaria threatens to reduce abortion access. Goldbeck-Wood S BMJ; 1996 May; 312(7039):1118. PubMed ID: 8620125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Abortion: rights or technicalities? A comparison of Roe v. Wade with the abortion decision of the German Federal Constitutional Court. Brown HO Hum Life Rev; 1975; 1(3):60-74. PubMed ID: 11662181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Protection of unborn life by the state]. Schell W Kinderkrankenschwester; 1993 Aug; 12(8):287. PubMed ID: 8398792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Abortion checks at German-Dutch border. Von Baross J Plan Parent Eur; 1991 May; 20(1):26. PubMed ID: 12343177 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Abortion, 1973: some recent world events in relation to pregnancy termination. Trans Aust Med Congr; 1974 Jun; 1(5):27-30. PubMed ID: 12333737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Partial-birth abortion, Congress, and the Constitution. Annas GJ N Engl J Med; 1998 Jul; 339(4):279-83. PubMed ID: 9673308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Attorney General (Society for the Protection of Unborn Children Ltd.) v. Open Door Counselling Ltd., 16 March 1988. Ireland. Supreme Court Annu Rev Popul Law; 1988; 15():34-5. PubMed ID: 12289542 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Judgment of 10 June 1991]. Germany. Verwaltungsgerichtshof, Mannheim Neue Jurist Wochenschr; 1991; (37):2362-5. PubMed ID: 12346991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Coverage of abortion controversial in both public and private plans. Sollom T State Reprod Health Monit; 1996 Sep; 7(3):5-6. PubMed ID: 12347485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Abortion using health insurance]. Gritschneder O Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1984 Sep; 44(9):604-7. PubMed ID: 6567566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fetal viability as a threshold to personhood. A legal analysis. Peterfy A J Leg Med; 1995 Dec; 16(4):607-36. PubMed ID: 8568420 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The concept of wrongful life in the law. Kasper AS Women Health; 1983; 8(1):81-7. PubMed ID: 6868627 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Abortion bills introduced to Western Australian parliament. Loff B; Cordner S Lancet; 1998 Mar; 351(9106):892. PubMed ID: 9525385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reproductive Health Services v. Webster, 17 March 1987, amended on 30 April 1987. United States. District Court, Western District of Missouri Annu Rev Popul Law; 1987; 14():43-4. PubMed ID: 12346730 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Opinion of the Federal Constitutional Court on abortion]. Rieger HJ Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1993 Aug; 118(31):1127-30. PubMed ID: 8344169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Gynaecologists and abortion in Northern Ireland. Francome C J Biosoc Sci; 1994 Jul; 26(3):389-94. PubMed ID: 7929486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Abortion law in Italy]. Havránek F Cesk Gynekol; 1979 Apr; 44(3):223. PubMed ID: 445601 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Legal abortion in Europe. IPPF Eur Reg Inf; 1978 Jan; 7(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 12178336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Selected legal developments in reproductive health in 1991. Boland R Fam Plann Perspect; 1992; 24(4):178-85. PubMed ID: 1526275 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]