208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7614001)
21. Motor unit recruitment and rate coding in response to fatiguing shoulder abductions and subsequent recovery.
Jensen BR; Pilegaard M; Sjøgaard G
Eur J Appl Physiol; 2000 Oct; 83(2-3):190-9. PubMed ID: 11104060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The excitability of human cortical inhibitory circuits responsible for the muscle silent period after transcranial brain stimulation.
Bertasi V; Bertolasi L; Frasson E; Priori A
Exp Brain Res; 2000 Jun; 132(3):384-9. PubMed ID: 10883387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Rise time or rise rate: which should be a criterion for analysing motor unit action potentials?
Masakado Y; Akaboshi K; Kimura A; Chino N
Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2000 Sep; 40(6):381-3. PubMed ID: 11039123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Covariation between human intrinsic hand muscles of the silent periods and compound muscle action potentials evoked by magnetic brain stimulation: evidence for common inhibitory connections.
Ho KH; Nithi K; Mills KR
Exp Brain Res; 1998 Oct; 122(4):433-40. PubMed ID: 9827862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Motor unit recruitment and derecruitment induced by brief increase in contraction amplitude of the human trapezius muscle.
Westad C; Westgaard RH; De Luca CJ
J Physiol; 2003 Oct; 552(Pt 2):645-56. PubMed ID: 14561844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Paired-pulse magnetic stimulation of the human motor cortex: differences among I waves.
Hanajima R; Ugawa Y; Terao Y; Sakai K; Furubayashi T; Machii K; Kanazawa I
J Physiol; 1998 Jun; 509 ( Pt 2)(Pt 2):607-18. PubMed ID: 9575308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Changes in motor unit firing rate in synergist muscles cannot explain the maintenance of force during constant force painful contractions.
Hodges PW; Ervilha UF; Graven-Nielsen T
J Pain; 2008 Dec; 9(12):1169-74. PubMed ID: 18755636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Relaxation from a voluntary contraction is preceded by increased excitability of motor cortical inhibitory circuits.
Buccolieri A; Abbruzzese G; Rothwell JC
J Physiol; 2004 Jul; 558(Pt 2):685-95. PubMed ID: 15181164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. "Facial" and standard concentric needle electrodes are not interchangeable.
Barkhaus PE; Roberts MM; Nandedkar SD
Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Sep; 46(5):259-61. PubMed ID: 17059096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Simulation and analysis of the electromyographic interference pattern in normal muscle. Part II: Activity, upper centile amplitude, and number of small segments.
Nandedkar SD; Sanders DB; Stålberg EV
Muscle Nerve; 1986; 9(6):486-90. PubMed ID: 3736582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Motor responses of muscles supplied by cranial nerves to subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimuli.
Costa J; Valls-Solé J; Valldeoriola F; Rumià J; Tolosa E
Brain; 2007 Jan; 130(Pt 1):245-55. PubMed ID: 17151002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Excitability of human upper limb motoneurones during rhythmic discharge tested with transcranial magnetic stimulation.
Olivier E; Bawa P; Lemon RN
J Physiol; 1995 May; 485 ( Pt 1)(Pt 1):257-69. PubMed ID: 7658379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Influence of sensory deprivation and perturbation of trigeminal afferent fibers on corticomotor control of human tongue musculature.
Halkjaer L; Melsen B; McMillan AS; Svensson P
Exp Brain Res; 2006 Apr; 170(2):199-205. PubMed ID: 16328282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Recruitment of triceps surae motor units in the decerebrate cat. II. Heterogeneity among soleus motor units.
Sokoloff AJ; Cope TC
J Neurophysiol; 1996 May; 75(5):2005-16. PubMed ID: 8734599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Motor unit potential change with contraction level: a concentric macro electromyography study.
Jabre JF; Guan Y; Chui KK
Muscle Nerve; 2013 Oct; 48(4):551-6. PubMed ID: 23861219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A simulation study on the relation between the motor unit depth and action potential from multi-channel surface electromyography recordings.
He J; Luo Z
J Clin Neurosci; 2018 Aug; 54():146-151. PubMed ID: 29805080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Relation between the size of motor units and the spectral characteristics of their action potentials. kazuseki@iname.com.
Seki K; Narusawa M
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1998 Oct; 109(5):436-43. PubMed ID: 9851301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Quantification of motor unit action potential energy.
Sheean GL
Clin Neurophysiol; 2012 Mar; 123(3):621-5. PubMed ID: 21903464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Electrophysiological evidence of doubly innervated branched muscle fibers in the human brachioradialis muscle.
Lateva ZC; McGill KC
Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Dec; 118(12):2612-9. PubMed ID: 17977064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Motor unit tracking with high-density surface EMG.
Maathuis EM; Drenthen J; van Dijk JP; Visser GH; Blok JH
J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2008 Dec; 18(6):920-30. PubMed ID: 18996724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]