121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7614189)
1. Receiver operating characteristics of RadioVisioGraphy.
Dagenais ME; Clark BG
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1995 Feb; 79(2):238-45. PubMed ID: 7614189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Radiovisiographic diagnosis of dental caries: initial comparison of basic mode videoprints with bitewing radiography.
Russell M; Pitts NB
Caries Res; 1993; 27(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 8448777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In vitro comparison of D- and E-speed film radiography, RVG, and visualix digital radiography for the detection of enamel approximal and dentinal occlusal caries lesions.
Hintze H; Wenzel A; Jones C
Caries Res; 1994; 28(5):363-7. PubMed ID: 8001059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Detection of approximal caries with a storage phosphor system. A comparison of enhanced digital images with dental X-ray film.
Møystad A; Svanaes DB; Risnes S; Larheim TA; Gröndahl HG
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Sep; 25(4):202-6. PubMed ID: 9084274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Intraoral storage phosphor radiography for approximal caries detection and effect of image magnification: comparison with conventional radiography.
Svanaes DB; Møystad A; Risnes S; Larheim TA; Gröndahl HG
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1996 Jul; 82(1):94-100. PubMed ID: 8843461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of a film-based and a direct digital dental radiographic system using a proximal caries model.
Price C; Ergül N
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1997 Jan; 26(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 9446990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Approximal caries depth assessment with storage phosphor versus film radiography. Evaluation of the caries-specific Oslo enhancement procedure.
Svanaes DB; Moystad A; Larheim TA
Caries Res; 2000; 34(6):448-53. PubMed ID: 11093017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. RVG-S, VIXA, and Ektaspeed film in detection of proximal enamel defects under orthodontic bands.
Reichl P; Farman AG; Scarfe WC; Goldsmith LJ
Angle Orthod; 1996; 66(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 8678348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In vitro perception of low-contrast features in digital, film, and digitized dental radiographs: a receiver operating characteristic analysis.
Grassl U; Schulze RK
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 May; 103(5):694-701. PubMed ID: 17466887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Detection of proximal caries in vitro using standard and task-specific enhanced images from a storage phosphor plate system.
Li G; Sanderink GC; Berkhout WE; Syriopoulos K; van der Stelt PF
Caries Res; 2007; 41(3):231-4. PubMed ID: 17426405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of different background lighting conditions on diagnostic performance of digital and film images.
Cederberg RA; Frederiksen NL; Benson BW; Shulman JD
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Sep; 27(5):293-7. PubMed ID: 9879219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of conventional intra-oral radiography and computer imaging techniques for the detection of proximal surface dental caries.
Dove SB; McDavid WD
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1992 Aug; 21(3):127-34. PubMed ID: 1397467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The influence of image quality on radiographic diagnosis of approximal caries.
Svenson B
Swed Dent J Suppl; 1991; 74():1-62. PubMed ID: 2035145
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Direct digital radiography in the dental office.
Wenzel A; Gröndahl HG
Int Dent J; 1995 Feb; 45(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 7607741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of diagnostic performance on approximal caries detection among Swedish and Chinese senior dental students using analogue and digital radiographs.
Minston W; Li G; Wennberg R; Näsström K; Shi XQ
Swed Dent J; 2013; 37(2):79-85. PubMed ID: 23957142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Radiographic detection of occlusal caries in noncavitated teeth. A comparison of conventional film radiographs, digitized film radiographs, and RadioVisioGraphy.
Wenzel A; Hintze H; Mikkelsen L; Mouyen F
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1991 Nov; 72(5):621-6. PubMed ID: 1745523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of extraoral tuned aperture computed tomography (TACT) for proximal caries detection.
Harase Y; Araki K; Okano T
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Jun; 101(6):791-6. PubMed ID: 16731402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. In vitro comparison of conventional film and direct digital imaging in the detection of approximal caries.
Castro VM; Katz JO; Hardman PK; Glaros AG; Spencer P
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Mar; 36(3):138-42. PubMed ID: 17463097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of direct digital and conventional radiography for the detection of proximal surface caries in the mixed dentition.
Uprichard KK; Potter BJ; Russell CM; Schafer TE; Adair S; Weller RN
Pediatr Dent; 2000; 22(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 10730280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of lossy image compression on accuracy of caries detection in digital images taken with a storage phosphor system.
Wenzel A; Gotfredsen E; Borg E; Gröndahl HG
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1996 Mar; 81(3):351-5. PubMed ID: 8653470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
