121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7614189)
21. Image quality of direct digital intraoral x-ray sensors in assessing root canal length. The RadioVisioGraphy, Visualix/VIXA, Sens-A-Ray, and Flash Dent systems compared with Ektaspeed films.
Sanderink GC; Huiskens R; van der Stelt PF; Welander US; Stheeman SE
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Jul; 78(1):125-32. PubMed ID: 8078654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Presentation and physical evaluation of RadioVisioGraphy.
Mouyen F; Benz C; Sonnabend E; Lodter JP
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1989 Aug; 68(2):238-42. PubMed ID: 2780024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of standard and task-specific enhancement of Digora storage phosphor images for approximal caries diagnosis.
Møystad A; Svanaes DB; van der Stelt PF; Gröndahl HG; Wenzel A; van Ginkel FC; Kullendorff B; Hintze H; Larheim TA
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Nov; 32(6):390-6. PubMed ID: 15070842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Quantitative assessment of a new dental imaging system.
Walker A; Horner K; Czajka J; Shearer AC; Wilson NH
Br J Radiol; 1991 Jun; 64(762):529-36. PubMed ID: 2070184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Effects of filtration, collimation, and target-receptor distance on artificial approximal enamel lesion detection with the use of RadioVisioGraphy.
Parks ET; Miles DA; Van Dis ML; Williamson GF; Razmus TF; Bricker SL
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Apr; 77(4):419-26. PubMed ID: 8015809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Simulated bone erosions in a hand phantom: detection with conventional screen-film technology versus cesium iodide-amorphous silicon flat-panel detector.
Strotzer M; Völk M; Wild T; von Landenberg P; Feuerbach S
Radiology; 2000 May; 215(2):512-5. PubMed ID: 10796933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Accuracy of caries diagnosis in digital images from charge-coupled device and storage phosphor systems: an in vitro study.
Wenzel A; Borg E; Hintze H; Gröndahl HG
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Nov; 24(4):250-4. PubMed ID: 9161170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Two- and three-dimensional imaging modalities for the detection of caries. A comparison between film, digital radiography and tuned aperture computed tomography (TACT).
Abreu Júnior M; Tyndall DA; Platin E; Ludlow JB; Phillips C
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 May; 28(3):152-7. PubMed ID: 10740469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Computed radiography with photostimulable phosphor in oral and maxillofacial radiology.
Kashima I
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1995 Nov; 80(5):577-98. PubMed ID: 8556466
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Radiovisiography for length estimation in root canal treatment: an in-vitro comparison with conventional radiography.
Shearer AC; Horner K; Wilson NH
Int Endod J; 1991 Sep; 24(5):233-9. PubMed ID: 1813427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of full-field digital mammography to screen-film mammography with respect to contrast and spatial resolution in tissue equivalent breast phantoms.
Kuzmiak CM; Pisano ED; Cole EB; Zeng D; Burns CB; Roberto C; Pavic D; Lee Y; Seo BK; Koomen M; Washburn D
Med Phys; 2005 Oct; 32(10):3144-50. PubMed ID: 16279068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Proximal surface caries detection with direct-exposure and rare earth screen/film imaging.
Lundeen RC; McDavid WD; Barnwell GM
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1988 Dec; 66(6):734-45. PubMed ID: 3205558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Effects of reduced exposure on computed radiography: comparison of nodule detection accuracy with conventional and asymmetric screen-film radiographs of a chest phantom.
Kimme-Smith C; Aberle DR; Sayre JW; Hart EM; Greaves SM; Brown K; Young DA; Deseran MD; Johnson T; Johnson SL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Aug; 165(2):269-73. PubMed ID: 7618538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Diagnostic accuracy of two software modalities for detection of caries lesions in digital radiographs from four dental systems.
Hintze H
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Mar; 35(2):78-82. PubMed ID: 16549433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Accuracy of diagnosing occlusal caries using enhanced digital images.
Kositbowornchai S; Basiw M; Promwang Y; Moragorn H; Sooksuntisakoonchai N
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Jul; 33(4):236-40. PubMed ID: 15533977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Ex vivo evaluation of new 2D and 3D dental radiographic technology for detecting caries.
Gaalaas L; Tyndall D; Mol A; Everett ET; Bangdiwala A
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(3):20150281. PubMed ID: 26670605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Performance of RVGui sensor and Kodak Ektaspeed Plus film for proximal caries detection.
Abreu M; Mol A; Ludlow JB
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Mar; 91(3):381-5. PubMed ID: 11250640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The use of a computer-based image analysis program for the diagnosis of approximal caries from bitewing radiographs.
Heaven TJ; Weems RA; Firestone AR
Caries Res; 1994; 28(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 8124698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Some characteristics of solid-state and photo-stimulable phosphor detectors for intra-oral radiography.
Borg E
Swed Dent J Suppl; 1999; 139():i-viii, 1-67. PubMed ID: 10635104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Factors determining the diagnostic accuracy of digitized conventional intraoral radiographs.
Ohki M; Okano T; Nakamura T
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1994 May; 23(2):77-82. PubMed ID: 7835507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
