121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7614189)
41. Proximal caries detection: Sirona Sidexis versus Kodak Ektaspeed Plus.
Khan EA; Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB; Caplan D
Gen Dent; 2005; 53(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 15779222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Direct digital radiography for the detection of periodontal bone lesions.
Furkart AJ; Dove SB; McDavid WD; Nummikoski P; Matteson S
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1992 Nov; 74(5):652-60. PubMed ID: 1437069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. In vivo study of approximal caries depth on storage phosphor plate images compared with dental x-ray film.
Versteeg KH; Sanderink GC; Velders XL; van Ginkel FC; van der Stelt PF
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1997 Aug; 84(2):210-3. PubMed ID: 9269024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. A comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of bitewing, periapical, unfiltered and filtered digital panoramic images for approximal caries detection in posterior teeth.
Akarslan ZZ; Akdevelioğlu M; Güngör K; Erten H
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Dec; 37(8):458-63. PubMed ID: 19033431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Influence of the validation method on diagnostic accuracy for caries. A comparison of six digital and two conventional radiographic systems.
Hintze H; Wenzel A
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Jan; 31(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 11803388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Digital radiology and image analysis for approximal caries diagnosis.
Forner L; Llena MC; Almerich JM; García-Godoy F
Oper Dent; 1999; 24(5):312-5. PubMed ID: 10823079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Radiovisiography--a preliminary subjective assessment in a hospital paediatric dentistry department.
Russell M; Pitts NB
Int J Paediatr Dent; 1993 Jun; 3(2):77-82. PubMed ID: 8218115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Effect of angular disparity of basis images and projection geometry on caries detection using tuned-aperture computed tomography.
Abreu M; Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Sep; 92(3):353-60. PubMed ID: 11552158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Observers' use of image enhancement in assessing caries in radiographs taken by four intra-oral digital systems.
Gotfredsen E; Wenzel A; Gröndahl HG
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Jan; 25(1):34-8. PubMed ID: 9084283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Subjective image quality of digitally filtered radiographs acquired by the Dürr Vistascan system compared with conventional radiographs.
Yalcinkaya S; Künzel A; Willers R; Thoms M; Becker J
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 May; 101(5):643-51. PubMed ID: 16632278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Detection of proximal caries with high-resolution and standard resolution digital radiographic systems.
Berkhout WE; Verheij JG; Syriopoulos K; Li G; Sanderink GC; van der Stelt PF
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 May; 36(4):204-10. PubMed ID: 17536087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Conventional, digital and contrast-enhanced bitewing radiographs in the decision to restore approximal carious lesions.
Haak R; Wicht MJ; Noack MJ
Caries Res; 2001; 35(3):193-9. PubMed ID: 11385199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Comparison of direct digital and conventional imaging with Ekta Speed Plus and INSIGHT films for the detection of approximal caries.
de Araujo EA; Castilho JC; Medici Filho E; de Moraes ME
Am J Dent; 2005 Aug; 18(4):241-4. PubMed ID: 16296430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Modulation transfer function of a digital dental x-ray system.
Chen SK; Hollender L
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Mar; 77(3):308-13. PubMed ID: 8170666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Detection of simulated chest lesions with normal and reduced radiation dose: comparison of conventional screen-film radiography and a flat-panel x-ray detector based on amorphous silicon.
Strotzer M; Gmeinwieser JK; Völk M; Fründ R; Seitz J; Feuerbach S
Invest Radiol; 1998 Feb; 33(2):98-103. PubMed ID: 9493725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Detection of cavitated or non-cavitated approximal enamel caries lesions using CMOS and CCD digital X-ray sensors and conventional D and F-speed films at different exposure conditions.
Bottenberg P; Jacquet W; Stachniss V; Wellnitz J; Schulte AG
Am J Dent; 2011 Apr; 24(2):74-8. PubMed ID: 21698985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Conventional film-screen versus computed storage phosphor radiography. Simulated miliary lung disease in an anthropomorphic phantom.
Mosser H; Pärtan G; Urban M; Krampla W; Ottes F; Hruby W
Invest Radiol; 1995 Mar; 30(3):186-91. PubMed ID: 7797418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. TACT imaging of primary caries.
Tyndall DA; Clifton TL; Webber RL; Ludlow JB; Horton RA
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1997 Aug; 84(2):214-25. PubMed ID: 9269025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Radiovisiography: an update.
Russell M; Pitts NB
Dent Update; 1993 May; 20(4):141-4. PubMed ID: 8405612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Detection of occlusal caries without cavitation by visual inspection, film radiographs, xeroradiographs, and digitized radiographs.
Wenzel A; Larsen MJ; Fejerskov O
Caries Res; 1991; 25(5):365-71. PubMed ID: 1747887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
