These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7614190)
41. An evaluation of Ektaspeed Plus film versus Ultraspeed film for endodontic working length determination. Brown R; Hadley JN; Chambers DW J Endod; 1998 Jan; 24(1):54-6. PubMed ID: 9487870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. A clinical comparison of speed group D and E dental x-ray films. Horton PS; Sippy FH; Kohout FJ; Nelson JF; Kienzle GC Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1984 Jul; 58(1):104-8. PubMed ID: 6589567 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Comparison of sensitometric and diagnostic performance of two films. White SC; Yoon DC Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2000 Jun; 21(6):530-2, 534, 536 passim. PubMed ID: 11199671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Optimal processing of Ektaspeed dental film. Fjellström CA; Fredholm U; Julin P; Rehnmark S Swed Dent J; 1986; 10(4):137-43. PubMed ID: 3466376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Sensitometric and image quality performance of "rapid" intraoral film processing techniques. Czajka J; Rushton VE; Shearer AC; Horner K Br J Radiol; 1996 Jan; 69(817):49-58. PubMed ID: 8785621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. A clinical evaluation of KODAK EKTASPEED dental X-ray film. Reynolds RL J Okla Dent Assoc; 1982; 73(1):13-4. PubMed ID: 6957555 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. [The choice of x-ray films for intraoral exposures: Ultraspeed or Ektaspeed?]. Sewerin I Tandlaegebladet; 1987 Feb; 91(3):95-9. PubMed ID: 3473718 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Sensitometric comparison of dental films of groups D and E. Thunthy KH; Weinberg R Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1982 Aug; 54(2):250-2. PubMed ID: 6956842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Comparison of films processed in automatic and manual processors. Thunthy KH; Weinberg R Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1980 Nov; 50(5):479-83. PubMed ID: 6935603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Sensitometric comparison of direct- and indirect-exposure films used in intraoral radiography. Hashimoto K; Thunthy KH; Iwai K; Ejima K; Weinberg R J Nihon Univ Sch Dent; 1992 Jun; 34(2):106-10. PubMed ID: 1500950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. The effects of developer age on diagnostic accuracy: a study using assessment of endodontic file length. Syriopoulos K; Sanderink GC; Velders XL; van Ginkel FC; van der Stelt PF Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Sep; 28(5):311-5. PubMed ID: 10490751 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Densitometric evaluation of four radiographic processing solutions. Akdeniz BG; Lomçali G Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Mar; 27(2):102-6. PubMed ID: 9656875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. [Kodak Ektaspeed - a new dental X-ray film]. Frykholm A Tandlakartidningen; 1982 Sep; 74(17):900-3. PubMed ID: 6964627 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. [Analysis of variations of exposure and development times of Kodak (Ektaspeed) and Agfa-Gevaert (Dentus M-2) periapical films]. de Pinho MB; Tavano O; Lopes ES Rev Odontol Univ Sao Paulo; 1987; 1(1):21-30. PubMed ID: 3507982 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Assessment of image quality in dental radiography, part 1: phantom validity. Yoshiura K; Kawazu T; Chikui T; Tatsumi M; Tokumori K; Tanaka T; Kanda S Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1999 Jan; 87(1):115-22. PubMed ID: 9927090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Optimal parameters for lateral oblique radiographs of rat mandibles. Mahl CR; Fontanella V Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 May; 37(4):224-7. PubMed ID: 18460576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. [Comparative study of Agfa-Gavaert, Kodak Ultra-Speed and Kodak Ektaspeed dental radiographic films, processed in Sillib solution]. Capelozza AL; Alvares LC Rev Odontol Univ Sao Paulo; 1990; 4(2):92-6. PubMed ID: 2135356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. An in-vitro evaluation of Kodak Insight and Ektaspeed Plus film with a CMOS detector for natural proximal caries: ROC analysis. Nair MK; Nair UP Caries Res; 2001; 35(5):354-9. PubMed ID: 11641571 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]