These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7614289)

  • 1. Understanding and evaluating a meta-analysis.
    Olson CM
    Acad Emerg Med; 1994; 1(4):392-8. PubMed ID: 7614289
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Evaluating the methodologic quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. AMSTAR (A Measurement Tool for the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews].
    Coenen M; Schuetz GM; Dewey M
    Rofo; 2013 Oct; 185(10):937-40. PubMed ID: 24490255
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Publication bias in dermatology systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Atakpo P; Vassar M
    J Dermatol Sci; 2016 May; 82(2):69-74. PubMed ID: 26925817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Uses and abuses of meta-analysis.
    Egger M; Smith GD; Sterne JA
    Clin Med (Lond); 2001; 1(6):478-84. PubMed ID: 11792089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Publication bias in medical informatics evaluation research: is it an issue or not?
    Machan C; Ammenwerth E; Bodner T
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2006; 124():957-62. PubMed ID: 17108634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Statistical methods for dealing with publication bias in meta-analysis.
    Jin ZC; Zhou XH; He J
    Stat Med; 2015 Jan; 34(2):343-60. PubMed ID: 25363575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Publication bias in meta-analysis: its causes and consequences.
    Thornton A; Lee P
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2000 Feb; 53(2):207-16. PubMed ID: 10729693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of publication bias in meta-analyses of cardiovascular diseases.
    Palma S; Delgado-Rodriguez M
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2005 Oct; 59(10):864-9. PubMed ID: 16166360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. Increase in studies of publication bias coincided with increasing use of meta-analysis.
    Song F; Gilbody S
    BMJ; 1998 Feb; 316(7129):471. PubMed ID: 9492690
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A systematic review evaluating the potential for bias and the methodological quality of meta-analyses in vaccinology.
    De Vito C; Manzoli L; Marzuillo C; Anastasi D; Boccia A; Villari P
    Vaccine; 2007 Dec; 25(52):8794-806. PubMed ID: 18035456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Publication Bias and Nonreporting Found in Majority of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses in Anesthesiology Journals.
    Hedin RJ; Umberham BA; Detweiler BN; Kollmorgen L; Vassar M
    Anesth Analg; 2016 Oct; 123(4):1018-25. PubMed ID: 27537925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Is there a "best" way to detect and minimize publication bias? An empirical evaluation.
    Pham B; Platt R; McAuley L; Klassen TP; Moher D
    Eval Health Prof; 2001 Jun; 24(2):109-25. PubMed ID: 11523382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. What is publication bias in a meta-analysis?
    Sedgwick P
    BMJ; 2015 Aug; 351():h4419. PubMed ID: 26276792
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Performing and evaluating meta-analyses.
    Burcharth J; Pommergaard HC; Rosenberg J
    Surgery; 2015 Feb; 157(2):189-93. PubMed ID: 25304841
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Publication bias and meta-analysis.
    Gilbody S; House A
    Br J Psychiatry; 1995 Aug; 167(2):266. PubMed ID: 7582683
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Publication bias in psychological science: prevalence, methods for identifying and controlling, and implications for the use of meta-analyses.
    Ferguson CJ; Brannick MT
    Psychol Methods; 2012 Mar; 17(1):120-8. PubMed ID: 21787082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Meta-analysis using effect size distributions of only statistically significant studies.
    van Assen MA; van Aert RC; Wicherts JM
    Psychol Methods; 2015 Sep; 20(3):293-309. PubMed ID: 25401773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How to read and understand and use systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Leucht S; Kissling W; Davis JM
    Acta Psychiatr Scand; 2009 Jun; 119(6):443-50. PubMed ID: 19469725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The implications of publication bias for meta-analysis' other parameter.
    Jackson D
    Stat Med; 2006 Sep; 25(17):2911-21. PubMed ID: 16345059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Meta-analysis, overviews and publication bias.
    Solomon P; Hutton J
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2001 Aug; 10(4):245-50. PubMed ID: 11491411
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.