These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

44 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7614874)

  • 1. Our experience in hip arthroplasty reimplantation.
    Monteleone V; Caprile A; Fonzone L; Gallotta T; Galluzzi V
    Chir Organi Mov; 1994; 79(4):349-51. PubMed ID: 7614874
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The treatment of severe acetabular osteolysis by bone grafts and cementless techniques.
    Jacchia GE; Capone A; Civinini R
    Chir Organi Mov; 1994; 79(4):433-6. PubMed ID: 7614887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Proximal femoral bone loss after total hip arthroplasty.
    Roberson JR
    Orthop Clin North Am; 1992 Apr; 23(2):291-302. PubMed ID: 1570141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Which surgical technique for severe acetabular bone stock deficiency? Panel: hip revision surgery.
    Weber U
    Chir Organi Mov; 1994; 79(4):437-40. PubMed ID: 7614888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The use of a cementless femoral component for the management of bone loss in revision hip arthroplasty.
    Michelinakis E; Papapolychronlou T; Vafiadis J
    Bull Hosp Jt Dis; 1996; 55(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 8771351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Proximal femoral allografts for reconstruction of bone stock in revision arthroplasty of the hip.
    Gross AE; Allan DG; Leitch KK; Hutchison CR
    Instr Course Lect; 1996; 45():143-7. PubMed ID: 8727733
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Restoration of femoral bone stock in revision total hip arthroplasty.
    Head WC; Wagner RA; Emerson RH; Malinin TI
    Orthop Clin North Am; 1993 Oct; 24(4):697-703. PubMed ID: 8414435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Changes in bone mineral density in the proximal femur 18 months after total hip arthroplasty with Exeter stem].
    Damborg F; Nissen N; Jørgensen HR; Abrahamsen B; Brixen KT
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2005 Feb; 167(9):1038-41. PubMed ID: 15804001
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The technique of reimplantation as it relates to bone defect.
    Pipino F; Molfetta L; Capozzi M
    Chir Organi Mov; 1994; 79(4):295-303. PubMed ID: 7614868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Periprosthetic bone loss of the acetabulum. Classification and management.
    D'Antonio JA
    Orthop Clin North Am; 1992 Apr; 23(2):279-90. PubMed ID: 1570140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Noncemented acetabular revision arthroplasty using allograft bone.
    Emerson RH; Head WC; Berklacich FM; Malinin TI
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1989 Dec; (249):30-43. PubMed ID: 2582676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Two-year to five-year follow-up of femoral defects in femoral revision treated with the link MP modular stem.
    Rodriguez JA; Fada R; Murphy SB; Rasquinha VJ; Ranawat CS
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Aug; 24(5):751-8. PubMed ID: 18977637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Femoral reconstruction with endosteal bone allografts protected by a metallic mesh in reoperation of total hip prosthesis. 19 cases with an average follow-up of 83 months].
    Migaud H; Jardin C; Fontaine C; Pierchon F; d'Herbomez O; Duquennoy A
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 1997; 83(4):360-7. PubMed ID: 9452810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [A revision prosthesis for the hip joint].
    Wagner H
    Orthopade; 1989 Sep; 18(5):438-53. PubMed ID: 2812776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Femoral revision in iterative aseptic hip arthroplasties. Introduction].
    Courpied JP
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2000 Sep; 86 Suppl 1():37. PubMed ID: 11084483
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Acetabular reconstructions using spongious grafts in reoperation of total hip arthroplasties].
    Olivier H; Sanouiller JL
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 1991; 77(4):232-40. PubMed ID: 1833789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Results of mild bone loss (grades 2 and 3)].
    Vidalain JP
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2000 Sep; 86 Suppl 1():60-3. PubMed ID: 11084492
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Advantages and limitations of impacted morselized grafts].
    Vielpeau C; Hulet C; Elmoataz H; Texier A; Geffard B
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2000 Sep; 86 Suppl 1():77-80. PubMed ID: 11084498
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mechanisms of bone loss associated with total hip replacement.
    Jacobs JJ; Sumner DR; Galante JO
    Orthop Clin North Am; 1993 Oct; 24(4):583-90. PubMed ID: 8414423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Morselized homologous grafts in revision arthroplasty of the acetabulum.
    Herzog R; Morscher E
    Chir Organi Mov; 1994; 79(4):371-8. PubMed ID: 7614878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.