225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7615317)
1. Three-dimensional finite element model of a human mandible incorporating six osseointegrated implants for stress analysis of mandibular cantilever prostheses.
van Zyl PP; Grundling NL; Jooste CH; Terblanche E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1995; 10(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 7615317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the effect of 1-piece superstructure on mandibular flexure.
Naini RB; Nokar S
Implant Dent; 2009 Oct; 18(5):428-37. PubMed ID: 22129961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of restoration type on stress distribution in bone around implants: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Stegaroiu R; Sato T; Kusakari H; Miyakawa O
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(1):82-90. PubMed ID: 9509784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of superstructure design on stress distribution in peri-implant bone during mandibular flexure.
Nokar S; Baghai Naini R
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 20209184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of implant design on the stress distribution in a three-unit implant-supported distal cantilever fixed partial denture: a three-dimensional finite-element analysis.
Koka P; Mohapatra A; Anandapandian PA; Murugesan K; Vasanthakumar M
Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 22945697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Stress patterns on implants in prostheses supported by four or six implants: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Silva GC; Mendonça JA; Lopes LR; Landre J
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(2):239-46. PubMed ID: 20369081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanical interactions in tooth-implant-supported fixed partial dentures with variations in the number of splinted teeth and connector type: a finite element analysis.
Lin CL; Wang JC; Chang WJ
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Jan; 19(1):107-17. PubMed ID: 17944965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Tilting of splinted implants for improved prosthodontic support: a two-dimensional finite element analysis.
Zampelis A; Rangert B; Heijl L
J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Jun; 97(6 Suppl):S35-43. PubMed ID: 17618932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Finite-element analysis of stress on dental implant prosthesis.
Rubo JH; Capello Souza EA
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2010 Jun; 12(2):105-13. PubMed ID: 19220846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Finite element analysis of fixed prostheses attached to osseointegrated implants.
Williams KR; Watson CJ; Murphy WM; Scott J; Gregory M; Sinobad D
Quintessence Int; 1990 Jul; 21(7):563-70. PubMed ID: 2094856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The mechanical behaviour of cantilever fixed partial dentures in shortened dental arch therapy: a 2-D finite element analysis.
Romeed SA; Fok SL; Wilson NH
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2004 Mar; 12(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 15058178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Finite element stress analysis of dental prostheses supported by straight and angled implants.
Cruz M; Wassall T; Toledo EM; da Silva Barra LP; Cruz S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):391-403. PubMed ID: 19587860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanics of cantilever fixed partial dentures in shortened dental arch therapy.
Romeed SA; Fok SL; Wilson NH
J Prosthodont; 2004 Jun; 13(2):90-100. PubMed ID: 15210004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Finite element analysis of effect of prosthesis height, angle of force application, and implant offset on supporting bone.
Sütpideler M; Eckert SE; Zobitz M; An KN
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(6):819-25. PubMed ID: 15623056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Finite element stress analysis of the influence of staggered versus straight placement of dental implants.
Akça K; Iplikçioğlu H
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(5):722-30. PubMed ID: 11669255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of marginal bone resorption on stress around an implant--a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Kitamura E; Stegaroiu R; Nomura S; Miyakawa O
J Oral Rehabil; 2005 Apr; 32(4):279-86. PubMed ID: 15790383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of different inter-implant distances on the stress distribution around endosseous implants in posterior mandible: a 3D finite element analysis.
Simşek B; Erkmen E; Yilmaz D; Eser A
Med Eng Phys; 2006 Apr; 28(3):199-213. PubMed ID: 15979921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Stress concentration in all-ceramic posterior fixed partial dentures.
Kamposiora P; Papavasiliou G; Bayne SC; Felton DA
Quintessence Int; 1996 Oct; 27(10):701-6. PubMed ID: 9180408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A three-dimensional finite element study on two versus four implants in an edentulous mandible.
Meijer HJ; Starmans FJ; Steen WH; Bosman F
Int J Prosthodont; 1994; 7(3):271-9. PubMed ID: 7916894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Stress distribution on the metal framework of the implant-supported fixed prosthesis using different veneering materials.
Ciftçi Y; Canay S
Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(5):406-11. PubMed ID: 12066633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
