173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7615321)
1. The effects of prefabricated bar design on the success of overdentures stabilized by implants.
Wright PS; Watson RM; Heath MR
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1995; 10(1):79-87. PubMed ID: 7615321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of prefabricated and custom-made bars used for implant-retained mandibular complete overdentures.
Abd El-Dayem MA; Assad AS; Eldin Sanad ME; Mahmoud Mogahed SA
Implant Dent; 2009 Dec; 18(6):501-11. PubMed ID: 20009604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The influence of bar design (round versus milled bar) on prosthodontic maintenance of mandibular overdentures supported by 4 implants: a 5-year prospective study.
Krennmair G; Krainhöfner M; Piehslinger E
Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(6):514-20. PubMed ID: 19149069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Within-subject comparison of two rigid bar designs connecting two interforaminal implants: patients' satisfaction and prosthetic results.
Mericske-Stern R; Probst D; Fahrländer F; Schellenberg M
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Sep; 11(3):228-37. PubMed ID: 18783424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Implant-supported maxillary overdentures retained with milled bars: maxillary anterior versus maxillary posterior concept--a retrospective study.
Krennmair G; Krainhöfner M; Piehslinger E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(2):343-52. PubMed ID: 18548933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Five-year clinical results of immediately loaded dental implants using mandibular overdentures.
Alfadda SA; Attard NJ; David LA
Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(4):368-73. PubMed ID: 19639074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Maxillary overdentures retained by splinted and unsplinted implants: a retrospective study.
Närhi TO; Hevinga M; Voorsmit RA; Kalk W
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(2):259-66. PubMed ID: 11324214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with a milled bar: a retrospective study.
Krennmair G; Krainhöfner M; Piehslinger E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):987-94. PubMed ID: 18271381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Changes in the edentulous maxilla in persons wearing implant-retained mandibular overdentures.
Närhi TO; Geertman ME; Hevinga M; Abdo H; Kalk W
J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Jul; 84(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 10898841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mandibular implant-retained overdenture: a clinical trial of two anchorage systems.
Menicucci G; Lorenzetti M; Pera P; Preti G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(6):851-6. PubMed ID: 9857597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A 10-year randomized clinical trial on the influence of splinted and unsplinted oral implants retaining mandibular overdentures: peri-implant outcome.
Naert I; Alsaadi G; van Steenberghe D; Quirynen M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(5):695-702. PubMed ID: 15508985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mandibular implant-supported overdentures: a prospective evaluation of the burden of prosthodontic maintenance with 3 different attachment systems.
Payne AG; Solomons YF
Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(3):246-53. PubMed ID: 11203640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with ball or telescopic crown attachments: a 3-year prospective study.
Krennmair G; Weinländer M; Krainhöfner M; Piehslinger E
Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(2):164-70. PubMed ID: 16602365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A longitudinal study on mandibular implants supporting an overdenture: the influence of retention mechanism and anatomic-prosthetic variables on periimplant parameters.
Oetterli M; Kiener P; Mericske-Stern R
Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(6):536-42. PubMed ID: 12066700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The symphyseal single-tooth implant for anchorage of a mandibular complete denture in geriatric patients: a clinical report.
Krennmair G; Ulm C
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(1):98-104. PubMed ID: 11280368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mandibular overdentures supported by two or four endosseous implants: a 10-year clinical trial.
Meijer HJ; Raghoebar GM; Batenburg RH; Visser A; Vissink A
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jul; 20(7):722-8. PubMed ID: 19489933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of superstructure type and design on force transmission via implant-stabilised mandibular prostheses.
el-Sheikh AM; Hobkirk JA; Kelleway JP
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1999; 7(2):45-50. PubMed ID: 10865379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of location and number of endosseous implants on retention and stability of magnetically retained mandibular overdentures: an in vitro study.
Wahab LA; Sadig W
Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(6):511-3. PubMed ID: 19149068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Masticatory function and patient satisfaction with implant-supported mandibular overdentures: a prospective 5-year study.
Bakke M; Holm B; Gotfredsen K
Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(6):575-81. PubMed ID: 12475165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Five-year results of fixed implant-supported rehabilitations with distal cantilevers for the edentulous mandible.
Gallucci GO; Doughtie CB; Hwang JW; Fiorellini JP; Weber HP
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jun; 20(6):601-7. PubMed ID: 19302389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
