127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7616813)
1. Cervical screening: what is the point?
Koss LG
Lancet; 1995 Jul; 346(8969):245-6; author reply 246-7. PubMed ID: 7616813
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Cervical screening: what is the point?
Denton KJ
Lancet; 1995 Jul; 346(8969):244; author reply 246-7. PubMed ID: 7616809
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Cervical screening: what is the point?
Soutter WP
Lancet; 1995 Jul; 346(8969):244-5; author reply 246-7. PubMed ID: 7616811
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Cervical screening: what is the point?
Robertson J; Woodend B
Lancet; 1995 Jul; 346(8969):245; author reply 246-7. PubMed ID: 7616812
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Cervical screening: what is the point?
McCartney P
Lancet; 1995 Jul; 346(8969):246-7. PubMed ID: 7616815
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Cervical screening: what is the point?
Campbell D
Lancet; 1995 Jul; 346(8969):245; author reply 246-7. PubMed ID: 7677888
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. New tests in cervical screening.
Raffle AE
Lancet; 1998 Jan; 351(9098):297. PubMed ID: 9457130
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Cervical cytology: perspectives from both sides of the Atlantic.
Bonfiglio TA
Hum Pathol; 1997 Feb; 28(2):117-9. PubMed ID: 9023389
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Is improved detection of adenocarcinoma in situ by screening a key to reducing the incidence of cervical adenocarcinoma?
Syrjänen K
Acta Cytol; 2004; 48(5):591-4. PubMed ID: 15471248
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Does cervical cancer screening do more harm than good?
Payne L; Lavis P
Nurs Times; 2001 Jul 19-25; 97(29):20. PubMed ID: 11957496
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Cervical screening: what is the point?
Sasieni P
Lancet; 1995 Jul; 346(8969):244; author reply 246-7. PubMed ID: 7616810
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Is proficiency testing in cervical cytology proficient?
Herbert A
J Clin Pathol; 1997 Jul; 50(7):536-7. PubMed ID: 9306928
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Screening the screeners.
Ogden J
Nurs Stand; 1998 Feb 11-17; 12(21):12. PubMed ID: 9538758
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. National cervical screening programme.
Slater D
BMJ; 1990 Oct; 301(6757):887-8. PubMed ID: 2261531
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Reasons that some screening programmes fail to control cervical cancer.
Chamberlain J
IARC Sci Publ; 1986; (76):161-8. PubMed ID: 3570402
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Cervical cancer screening--an alternative viewpoint.
Rogers A
West Engl Med J; 1990 Sep; 105(3):77-9, 71. PubMed ID: 2093353
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Towards effective cervical screening.
Havelock C; Havelock P
Practitioner; 1994 Apr; 238(1537):296-301. PubMed ID: 8183816
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Cervical cancer screening: the time for reappraisal.
Skrabanek P
Can J Public Health; 1988; 79(2):86-9. PubMed ID: 3383065
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Reducing mortality due to cervical cancer. PAPNET fails the test.
Melnikow J; Nuovo J
Arch Fam Med; 1999; 8(1):56-7. PubMed ID: 9932073
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Cervical screening: what is the point?
Anthony PP; Clarke TJ
Lancet; 1995 Jul; 346(8969):246; author reply 246-7. PubMed ID: 7616814
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
