BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7617496)

  • 1. In vitro evaluation of an adhesive monomer as a bonding agent for orthodontic brackets to primary teeth and nickel-chromium ion crowns.
    Ergas RP; Hondrum SO; Mathieu GP; Koonce JD
    Pediatr Dent; 1995; 17(3):204-6. PubMed ID: 7617496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of shear bond strengths of orthodontic brackets bonded to deciduous and permanent teeth.
    Endo T; Ozoe R; Shinkai K; Shimomura J; Katoh Y; Shimooka S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Aug; 134(2):198-202. PubMed ID: 18675200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An in vitro study of the effect of Pro Seal varnish on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets.
    El Bokle D; Munir H
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(2):141-6. PubMed ID: 18575308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of self-etchant pH on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets.
    Ostby AW; Bishara SE; Denehy GE; Laffoon JF; Warren JJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Aug; 134(2):203-8. PubMed ID: 18675201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of in-vitro bond strengths between resin-modified glass ionomer, polyacid-modified composite resin, and giomer adhesive systems.
    Chitnis D; Dunn WJ; Gonzales DA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Mar; 129(3):330.e11-6. PubMed ID: 16527626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A new multipurpose dental adhesive for orthodontic use: an in vitro bond-strength study.
    Harari D; Aunni E; Gillis I; Redlich M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Sep; 118(3):307-10. PubMed ID: 10982932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bonding orthodontic brackets to porcelain using different adhesives/enamel conditioners: a comparative study.
    Bishara SE; Ajlouni R; Oonsombat C; Laffoon J
    World J Orthod; 2005; 6(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 15794038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of adhesion promoters on the shear bond strengths of orthodontic brackets to fluorosed enamel.
    Adanir N; Türkkahraman H; Yalçin Güngör A
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Jun; 31(3):276-80. PubMed ID: 19073952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bond strength analysis of custom base variables in indirect bonding techniques.
    Thompson MA; Drummond JL; BeGole EA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jan; 133(1):9.e15-20. PubMed ID: 18174062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of fluoride-releasing light-cured resin on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets.
    Tuncer C; Tuncer BB; Ulusoy C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jan; 135(1):14.e1-6; discussion 14-5. PubMed ID: 19121495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of the shear bond strength of 3 curing bracket bonding systems combined with an antibacterial adhesive.
    Bulut H; Türkün M; Türkün LS; Işiksal E
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jul; 132(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 17628254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bond strengths of an antibacterial monomer-containing adhesive system applied with and without acid etching for lingual retainer bonding.
    Ulker M; Uysal T; Ramoglu SI; Ucar FI
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Dec; 31(6):658-63. PubMed ID: 19487436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of light-cured filled sealant on shear bond strength of metal and ceramic brackets bonded with a resin-modified glass ionomer cement.
    Varlik SK; Ulusoy C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Feb; 135(2):194-8. PubMed ID: 19201326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of an antibacterial adhesive on the bond strength of three different luting resin composites.
    Cal E; Türkün LS; Türkün M; Toman M; Toksavul S
    J Dent; 2006 Jul; 34(6):372-80. PubMed ID: 16288949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bond strength for orthodontic brackets contaminated by blood: composite versus resin-modified glass ionomer cements.
    Reddy L; Marker VA; Ellis E
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Feb; 61(2):206-13. PubMed ID: 12618999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of shear and flexural bond strength tests versus failure modes of dentin bonding systems.
    Dunn WJ; Söderholm KJ
    Am J Dent; 2001 Oct; 14(5):297-303. PubMed ID: 11803994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Amalgam shear bond strength to dentin using single-bottle primer/adhesive systems.
    Cobb DS; Denehy GE; Vargas MA
    Am J Dent; 1999 Oct; 12(5):222-6. PubMed ID: 10649912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with different self-etching adhesives.
    Scougall Vilchis RJ; Yamamoto S; Kitai N; Yamamoto K
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Sep; 136(3):425-30. PubMed ID: 19732677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Should silane coupling agents be used when bonding brackets to composite restorations? An in vitro study.
    Eslamian L; Ghassemi A; Amini F; Jafari A; Afrand M
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Jun; 31(3):266-70. PubMed ID: 19193708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An in vitro comparison of the shear bond strength of a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement and a composite adhesive for bonding orthodontic brackets.
    Movahhed HZ; Ogaard B; Syverud M
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Oct; 27(5):477-83. PubMed ID: 16043469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.