BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7617909)

  • 21. [Radiation exposure in full-field digital mammography with a selenium flat-panel detector].
    Gosch D; Jendrass S; Scholz M; Kahn T
    Rofo; 2006 Jul; 178(7):693-7. PubMed ID: 16761214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A comparison between objective and subjective image quality measurements for a full field digital mammography system.
    Marshall NW
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(10):2441-63. PubMed ID: 16675862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Dental radiology dosimetric data as routinely collected in an Italian hospital.
    Fogli J; Carpentieri C; Del Guerra A; Fantacci ME; Marchi A; Marzulli V; Tofani A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):227-30. PubMed ID: 18375463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Experiences in the testing of standard data on roentgen diagnostic equipment].
    Klimpel H
    Rontgenblatter; 1985 Apr; 38(4):105-8. PubMed ID: 4001772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Computer-aided anesthesia monitoring. Experiences with the use of three systems in heart surgery].
    Petry A; Gockel H; Wulf H
    Anaesthesist; 1993 Aug; 42(8):528-35. PubMed ID: 8368474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Evaluation of patient exposure to X-ray in view of monitoring carried out in diagnostic laboratories of Lódź region].
    Jankowski J; Staniszewska MA; Wrońska S; Wróblewska D; Lesner M
    Med Pr; 2000; 51(2):107-14. PubMed ID: 10971924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Analysis of image quality in digital chest imaging.
    De Hauwere A; Bacher K; Smeets P; Verstraete K; Thierens H
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):174-7. PubMed ID: 16461499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Importance of quality assurance program implementation in conventional diagnostic radiology.
    Surić Mihić M; Mestrović T; Prlić I; Surić D
    Coll Antropol; 2008 Oct; 32 Suppl 2():181-4. PubMed ID: 19138023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Photostimulation plates or conventional films for bedside chest x-ray in pediatric radiology? A comparative study of quality of image and the dose delivered to patients].
    Maccia C; Docou le Pointe H; Fery-Lemonnier E; Nadeau X; Montagne JP; Charpentier E; Ariche-Cohen M; Viens-Bitker C
    J Radiol; 1996 Nov; 77(11):1129-34. PubMed ID: 9033870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Design of a database with graphical analysis for X-ray quality assurance and dose information to assist in a programme for patient dose reduction.
    Lam C; Martin CJ
    Br J Radiol; 1991 Sep; 64(765):831-5. PubMed ID: 1913047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. An audit of rejected repeated x-ray films as a quality assurance element in a radiology department.
    Eze KC; Omodia N; Okegbunam B; Adewonyi T; Nzotta CC
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2008 Dec; 11(4):355-8. PubMed ID: 19320410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Implementation of quality assurance in diagnostic radiology in Bosnia and Herzegovina (Republic of Srpska).
    Bosnjak J; Ciraj-Bjelac O; Strbac B
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):249-52. PubMed ID: 18283063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Quality assurance of computed and digital radiography systems.
    Walsh C; Gorman D; Byrne P; Larkin A; Dowling A; Malone JF
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):271-5. PubMed ID: 18319281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Variations of patient doses in interventional examinations at different angiographic units.
    Bor D; Toklu T; Olğar T; Sancak T; Cekirge S; Onal B; Bilgiç S
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2006; 29(5):797-806. PubMed ID: 16718424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Six Sigma: not for the faint of heart.
    Benedetto AR
    Radiol Manage; 2003; 25(2):40-53. PubMed ID: 12800564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. X-ray machine calibration: a study of failure rates.
    Pirtle OL
    Radiol Technol; 1994; 65(5):291-5; quiz 296-8. PubMed ID: 8058911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. First results on patient dose measurements from conventional diagnostic radiology procedures in Serbia and Montenegro.
    Ciraj O; Marković S; Kosutić D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 113(3):330-5. PubMed ID: 15755772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Control of the radiation quality in diagnostic x-ray equipment].
    Blinov NN; Gromov GD; Kuskova NM; Popova TA; Popov VV
    Med Tekh; 1983; (5):35-8. PubMed ID: 6645850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Technical advances of interventional fluoroscopy and flat panel image receptor.
    Lin PJ
    Health Phys; 2008 Nov; 95(5):650-7. PubMed ID: 18849699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A fit method for the determination of inherent filtration with diagnostic x-ray units.
    Meghzifene K; Aiginger H; Nowotny R
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(10):2585-97. PubMed ID: 16675871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.