226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7618496)
1. Abnormal Papanicolaou smears and colposcopic follow-up among American Indian and Alaska Native women in the Pacific northwest.
Gilbert TJ; Sugarman JR; Cobb N
J Am Board Fam Pract; 1995; 8(3):183-8. PubMed ID: 7618496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Race-specific results of Papanicolaou testing and the rate of cervical neoplasia in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program, 1991-1998 (United States).
Benard VB; Lee NC; Piper M; Richardson L
Cancer Causes Control; 2001 Jan; 12(1):61-8. PubMed ID: 11227926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Is human papillomavirus testing an effective triage method for detection of high-grade (grade 2 or 3) cervical intraepithelial neoplasia?
Adam E; Kaufman RH; Berkova Z; Icenogle J; Reeves WC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Jun; 178(6):1235-44. PubMed ID: 9662307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Colposcopy Requirement of Papanicolaou Smear after Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance (ASC-US) by Follow-up Protocol in an Urban Gynaecology Clinic, a Retrospective Study in Thailand.
Perksanusak T; Sananpanichkul P; Chirdchim W; Bhamarapravatana K; Suwannarurk K
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(12):4977-80. PubMed ID: 26163625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Human papillomavirus testing as triage for atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions: sensitivity, specificity, and cost-effectiveness.
Kaufman RH; Adam E; Icenogle J; Reeves WC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Oct; 177(4):930-6. PubMed ID: 9369847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of the reliability of repeat cervical smears and colposcopy in patients with abnormal cervical cytology.
Mayeaux EJ; Harper MB; Abreo F; Pope JB; Phillips GS
J Fam Pract; 1995 Jan; 40(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 7807039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. HPV DNA testing of self-collected vaginal samples compared with cytologic screening to detect cervical cancer.
Wright TC; Denny L; Kuhn L; Pollack A; Lorincz A
JAMA; 2000 Jan; 283(1):81-6. PubMed ID: 10632284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Do women comply with recommendations for Papanicolaou smears following colposcopy? A retrospective study.
Martin JT
J Midwifery Womens Health; 2008; 53(2):138-42. PubMed ID: 18308263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Incidence of invasive cervical cancer preceded by negative screening in high-risk Alaska Native women.
Davidson M; Bulkow LR; Lanier AP; Smith RA; Hawkins I; Jensen H; Kiviat NB
Int J Epidemiol; 1994 Apr; 23(2):238-45. PubMed ID: 8082948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The clinical significance of the poor correlation of cervical dysplasia and cervical malignancy with referral cytologic results.
Lonky NM; Sadeghi M; Tsadik GW; Petitti D
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Sep; 181(3):560-6. PubMed ID: 10486464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Colposcopy in women with a normal Papanicolaou smear.
Peedicayil A; Regi A; Mathai M; Jasper P
Natl Med J India; 1994; 7(5):208-9. PubMed ID: 7827598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Appraisal of the modalities used to evaluate an initial abnormal Papanicolaou smear.
Higgins RV; Hall JB; McGee JA; Laurent S; Alvarez RD; Partridge EE
Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Aug; 84(2):174-8. PubMed ID: 8041525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Low national breast and cervical cancer-screening rates in American Indian and Alaska Native women with diabetes.
Giroux J; Welty TK; Oliver FK; Kaur JS; Leonardson G; Cobb N
J Am Board Fam Pract; 2000; 13(4):239-45. PubMed ID: 10933287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Significance of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance on ThinPrep papanicolaou smears.
Eltabbakh GH; Lipman JN; Mount SL; Morgan A
Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Oct; 79(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 11006029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Managing atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance in Papanicolaou smears.
Morin C; Bairati I; Bouchard C; Fortier M; Roy M; Moore L; Meisels A
J Reprod Med; 2001 Sep; 46(9):799-805. PubMed ID: 11584480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A randomized trial of basing treatment on human papillomavirus and/or cytology results in low-grade cervical lesion triage.
Bjerre P; Silfverdal L; Dillner L; Hagmar B; Edvardsson H; Dillner J; Andersson-Ellström A
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jul; 199(1):24.e1-7. PubMed ID: 18295172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. "See and treat" approach is appropriate in women with high-grade lesions on either cervical cytology or colposcopy.
Aue-Aungkul A; Punyawatanasin S; Natprathan A; Srisomboon J; Kietpeerakool C
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2011; 12(7):1723-6. PubMed ID: 22126552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Underlying pathology of women with "atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion" smears, in a region with a high incidence of cervical cancer.
Kietpeerakool C; Srisomboon J; Tantipalakorn C; Suprasert P; Khunamornpong S; Nimmanhaeminda K; Siriaunkgul S
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2008 Apr; 34(2):204-9. PubMed ID: 18412783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Human papillomavirus and Papanicolaou tests to screen for cervical cancer.
Naucler P; Ryd W; Törnberg S; Strand A; Wadell G; Elfgren K; Rådberg T; Strander B; Johansson B; Forslund O; Hansson BG; Rylander E; Dillner J
N Engl J Med; 2007 Oct; 357(16):1589-97. PubMed ID: 17942872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Women's triage and management preferences for cervical cytologic reports demonstrating atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.
Ferris DG; Kriegel D; Cote L; Litaker M; Woodward L
Arch Fam Med; 1997; 6(4):348-53. PubMed ID: 9225706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
