These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

75 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7619132)

  • 1. Meta-analyses of interventional trials done in populations with different risks.
    Gonser M; Vetter K; Noack F
    Lancet; 1995 May; 345(8960):1304. PubMed ID: 7619132
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Meta-analyses of interventional trials done in populations with different risks.
    Schulz KF
    Lancet; 1995 May; 345(8960):1304-5. PubMed ID: 7746072
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Predictive ability of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials.
    Villar J; Carroli G; Belizán JM
    Lancet; 1995 Mar; 345(8952):772-6. PubMed ID: 7891492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Systematic reviews in perinatal medicine.
    Halliday HL
    J Perinat Med; 1999; 27(1):41-4. PubMed ID: 10343933
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [The Cochrane library].
    Bréart G
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2000 Oct; 48(5):417-8. PubMed ID: 11084522
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Randomized trials in perinatology: major achievements and future potential.
    Grant A
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1993 Dec; 703():107-17; discussion 117-8. PubMed ID: 8192288
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Discrepancies between meta-analyses and subsequent large randomized, controlled trials.
    LeLorier J; Grégoire G; Benhaddad A; Lapierre J; Derderian F
    N Engl J Med; 1997 Aug; 337(8):536-42. PubMed ID: 9262498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evidence-based medicine and perinatal care: from dawn to dusk.
    Keirse MJ
    Birth; 2012 Dec; 39(4):296-300. PubMed ID: 23281948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Value and limits of conventional or cumulative meta analysis in obstetrics and gynecology].
    Subtil D; Truffert P; Vinatier D; Puech F; Querleu D; Crepin G
    Therapie; 1994; 49(3):175-9. PubMed ID: 7878580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Predicting who will benefit from treatment.
    Herbison P
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2009; 28(3):168-9. PubMed ID: 19229951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Burning issues in the meta-analysis of pharmaceutical trials for depression.
    Fountoulakis KN; Samara MT; Siamouli M
    J Psychopharmacol; 2014 Feb; 28(2):106-17. PubMed ID: 24043723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prevention of spontaneous preterm birth: the role of sonographic cervical length in identifying patients who may benefit from progesterone treatment.
    Romero R
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Oct; 30(5):675-86. PubMed ID: 17899585
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A meta-analysis of meta-analyses.
    Sigman M
    Fertil Steril; 2011 Jul; 96(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 21723440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Meta-analyses and large randomized, controlled trials.
    Song FJ; Sheldon TA
    N Engl J Med; 1998 Jan; 338(1):60. PubMed ID: 9424564
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The need for large-scale randomized evidence without undue emphasis on small trials, meta-analyses, or subgroup analyses.
    Hennekens CH; Demets D
    JAMA; 2009 Dec; 302(21):2361-2. PubMed ID: 19952322
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Should meta-analyses of interventions include observational studies in addition to randomized controlled trials? A critical examination of underlying principles.
    Shrier I; Boivin JF; Steele RJ; Platt RW; Furlan A; Kakuma R; Brophy J; Rossignol M
    Am J Epidemiol; 2007 Nov; 166(10):1203-9. PubMed ID: 17712019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evidence from randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, and subgroup analyses.
    Sacristán JA
    JAMA; 2010 Apr; 303(13):1253-4; author reply 1254-5. PubMed ID: 20371780
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evidence from randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, and subgroup analyses.
    Bolland MJ; Grey A; Reid IR
    JAMA; 2010 Apr; 303(13):1254; author reply 1254-5. PubMed ID: 20371782
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Meta-analyses and large randomized, controlled trials.
    Bent S; Kerlikowske K; Grady D
    N Engl J Med; 1998 Jan; 338(1):60; author reply 61-2. PubMed ID: 9424565
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Robustness assessments are needed to reduce bias in meta-analyses that include zero-event randomized trials.
    Keus F; Wetterslev J; Gluud C; Gooszen HG; van Laarhoven CJ
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2009 Mar; 104(3):546-51. PubMed ID: 19262513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.