These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7620269)

  • 1. Product evaluation: theoretical and practical considerations.
    Elliott D; Hollins B
    Aust Crit Care; 1995 Jun; 8(2):14-9. PubMed ID: 7620269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A primer in technology assessment.
    Ackerman MH
    AACN Adv Crit Care; 2006; 17(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 16767010
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Integrating health economics modeling in the product development cycle of medical devices: a Bayesian approach.
    Vallejo-Torres L; Steuten LM; Buxton MJ; Girling AJ; Lilford RJ; Young T
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2008; 24(4):459-64. PubMed ID: 18828941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment and non-clinical impact of medical devices.
    Dervaux B; Szwarcensztein K; Josseran A; ; Barna A; Carbonneil C; Chevrie K; Debroucker F; Grumblat A; Grumel O; Massol J; Maugendre P; Méchin H; Orlikowski D; Roussel C; Rumeau-Pichon C; Sales JP; Vicaut E
    Therapie; 2015; 70(1):57-68. PubMed ID: 25747839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Selecting medical devices and materials for development in Korea: the analytic hierarchy process approach.
    Cho KT; Kim SM
    Int J Health Plann Manage; 2003; 18(2):161-74. PubMed ID: 12841155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cost effectiveness: designing research for product evaluation.
    Gift AG
    Clin Nurse Spec; 1995 Jul; 9(4):204-6. PubMed ID: 7634229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Health technology assessment in the United Kingdom.
    Akehurst R
    Value Health; 2010 Jun; 13 Suppl 1():S4-5. PubMed ID: 20618794
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The elements of a complete product evaluation.
    Stiefel R; Rizkalla E
    Biomed Instrum Technol; 1995; 29(6):482-8. PubMed ID: 8574262
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Professional product evaluation.
    Di Girolamo D
    J Intraven Nurs; 1995; 18(2):79-83. PubMed ID: 7707173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The economic evaluation of medical devices: challenges.
    Kingkaew P; Teerawattananon Y
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2014 May; 97 Suppl 5():S102-7. PubMed ID: 24964706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A thematic analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of manufacturers' submissions to the NICE Single Technology Assessment (STA) process.
    Carroll C; Kaltenthaler E; FitzGerald P; Boland A; Dickson R
    Health Policy; 2011 Oct; 102(2-3):136-44. PubMed ID: 21763025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of medical devices: how to conduct comparative technology evaluations of product performance.
    Burns LR; Bradlow ET; Lee JA; Antonacci AC
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2007; 23(4):455-63. PubMed ID: 17937834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Screening for hypercholesterolaemia versus case finding for familial hypercholesterolaemia: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Marks D; Wonderling D; Thorogood M; Lambert H; Humphries SE; Neil HA
    Health Technol Assess; 2000; 4(29):1-123. PubMed ID: 11109029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Economic evaluation approaches for new technology.
    Papatheofanis FJ
    IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag; 2003; 22(3):16-7. PubMed ID: 12845811
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Product evaluation and process improvement.
    Murray M; Stockard RR; Blaylock B; Stanfa DK; McKee M
    J Nurs Care Qual; 1994 Oct; 9(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 7994068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. ASSESSING THE VALUE OF INNOVATIVE MEDICAL DEVICES AND DIAGNOSTICS: THE IMPORTANCE OF CLEAR AND RELEVANT CLAIMS OF BENEFIT.
    Campbell B; Campbell M; Dobson L; Higgins J; Dillon B; Marlow M; Pomfrett CJD
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2018 Jan; 34(4):419-424. PubMed ID: 30025548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Review of Economic Submissions to NICE Medical Technologies Evaluation Programme.
    Alshreef A; Jenks M; Green W; Dixon S
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2016 Dec; 14(6):623-634. PubMed ID: 27480537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A primer on the assessment of medical technologies.
    Matuszewski KA
    Pharm Pract Manag Q; 1997 Jan; 16(4):53-65. PubMed ID: 10164160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In perspective: new medical devices and improved patient outcome.
    Caldwell MA
    Prog Cardiovasc Nurs; 1995; 10(2):23-7. PubMed ID: 7651946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Organisational impact: Definition and assessment methods for medical devices.
    Roussel C; Carbonneil C; Audry A;
    Therapie; 2016 Feb; 71(1):69-96. PubMed ID: 27080633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.