These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7622534)

  • 1. Creep characteristics of hand- and vacuum-mixed acrylic bone cement at elevated stress levels.
    Norman TL; Kish V; Blaha JD; Gruen TA; Hustosky K
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1995 Apr; 29(4):495-501. PubMed ID: 7622534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Long-term compressive creep deformation and damage in acrylic bone cements.
    Chwirut DJ
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1984 Jan; 18(1):25-37. PubMed ID: 6699030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Creep behavior of hand-mixed Simplex P bone cement under cyclic tensile loading.
    Verdonschot N; Huiskes R
    J Appl Biomater; 1994; 5(3):235-43. PubMed ID: 10147450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of temperature and vacuum mixing on bone cement properties.
    Smeds S; Goertzen D; Ivarsson I
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1997 Jan; (334):326-34. PubMed ID: 9005930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Damage accumulation, fatigue and creep behaviour of vacuum mixed bone cement.
    Jeffers JR; Browne M; Taylor M
    Biomaterials; 2005 Sep; 26(27):5532-41. PubMed ID: 15860209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of two variables on the fatigue performance of acrylic bone cement: mixing method and viscosity.
    Lewis G
    Biomed Mater Eng; 1999; 9(4):197-207. PubMed ID: 10674174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Mechanical properties of new low viscosity bone cements--can be improved by vacuum mixing].
    Kaltenkirchen N; Fritsch E; Rupp S; Kraus P
    Unfallchirurg; 1996 Jul; 99(7):492-7. PubMed ID: 8928019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dynamic creep behavior of acrylic bone cement.
    Verdonschot N; Huiskes R
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1995 May; 29(5):575-81. PubMed ID: 7622542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Vacuum mixing systems for bone cement completion - comparison of different systems].
    Horas U; Seidel P; Heiss C; Kilian O; Dingeldein E; Schnettler R
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2002; 140(6):603-10. PubMed ID: 12476381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of various vacuum mixing systems and bone cements as regards reliability, porosity and bending strength.
    Mau H; Schelling K; Heisel C; Wang JS; Breusch SJ
    Acta Orthop Scand; 2004 Apr; 75(2):160-72. PubMed ID: 15180231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Innovations in acrylic bone cement and application equipment.
    Kindt-Larsen T; Smith DB; Jensen JS
    J Appl Biomater; 1995; 6(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 7703541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of vacuum mixing on the mechanical properties of antibiotic-impregnated polymethylmethacrylate bone cement.
    Askew MJ; Kufel MF; Fleissner PR; Gradisar IA; Salstrom SJ; Tan JS
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1990 May; 24(5):573-80. PubMed ID: 2324127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of antibiotic impregnation on the fatigue life of Simplex P and Palacos R acrylic bone cements, with and without centrifugation.
    Davies JP; O'Connor DO; Burke DW; Harris WH
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1989 Apr; 23(4):379-97. PubMed ID: 2708414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [A quantitative analysis for determining porosity of pre-compressed and vacuum-mixed bone cement].
    Hahn M; Engelbrecht E; Delling G
    Chirurg; 1990 Jul; 61(7):512-7. PubMed ID: 2394193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of mixing on gentamicin release from polymethylmethacrylate bone cements.
    Neut D; van de Belt H; van Horn JR; van der Mei HC; Busscher HJ
    Acta Orthop Scand; 2003 Dec; 74(6):670-6. PubMed ID: 14763697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of mixing method on the porosity of encapsulated glass ionomer cement.
    Nomoto R; Komoriyama M; McCabe JF; Hirano S
    Dent Mater; 2004 Dec; 20(10):972-8. PubMed ID: 15501326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Vacuum mixing of acrylic bone cement.
    Wixson RL; Lautenschlager EP; Novak MA
    J Arthroplasty; 1987; 2(2):141-9. PubMed ID: 3612140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The clinical significance of vacuum mixing bone cement.
    Geiger MH; Keating EM; Ritter MA; Ginther JA; Faris PM; Meding JB
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2001 Jan; (382):258-66. PubMed ID: 11153996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mechanical properties of vacuum-mixed acrylic bone cement.
    Lewis G; Austin GE
    J Appl Biomater; 1994; 5(4):307-14. PubMed ID: 8580537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Relative influence of composition and viscosity of acrylic bone cement on its apparent fracture toughness.
    Lewis G
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2000; 10(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 10950202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.