These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

310 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7622542)

  • 1. Dynamic creep behavior of acrylic bone cement.
    Verdonschot N; Huiskes R
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1995 May; 29(5):575-81. PubMed ID: 7622542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Creep behavior of hand-mixed Simplex P bone cement under cyclic tensile loading.
    Verdonschot N; Huiskes R
    J Appl Biomater; 1994; 5(3):235-43. PubMed ID: 10147450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Long-term compressive creep deformation and damage in acrylic bone cements.
    Chwirut DJ
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1984 Jan; 18(1):25-37. PubMed ID: 6699030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Subsidence of THA stems due to acrylic cement creep is extremely sensitive to interface friction.
    Verdonschot N; Huiskes R
    J Biomech; 1996 Dec; 29(12):1569-75. PubMed ID: 8945655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Damage accumulation, fatigue and creep behaviour of vacuum mixed bone cement.
    Jeffers JR; Browne M; Taylor M
    Biomaterials; 2005 Sep; 26(27):5532-41. PubMed ID: 15860209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A fatigue damage model for the cement-bone interface.
    Kim DG; Miller MA; Mann KA
    J Biomech; 2004 Oct; 37(10):1505-12. PubMed ID: 15336925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fatigue properties and stem subsidence in wire coil reinforced PMMA bone cement: a preliminary in vitro study.
    Kim JK; Park JB
    Biomed Mater Eng; 1996; 6(6):453-62. PubMed ID: 9138655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Creep characteristics of hand- and vacuum-mixed acrylic bone cement at elevated stress levels.
    Norman TL; Kish V; Blaha JD; Gruen TA; Hustosky K
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1995 Apr; 29(4):495-501. PubMed ID: 7622534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Acrylic cement creeps but does not allow much subsidence of femoral stems.
    Verdonschot N; Huiskes R
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1997 Jul; 79(4):665-9. PubMed ID: 9250762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Creep dominates tensile fatigue damage of the cement-bone interface.
    Kim DG; Miller MA; Mann KA
    J Orthop Res; 2004 May; 22(3):633-40. PubMed ID: 15099645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bone creep and short and long term subsidence after cemented stem total hip arthroplasty (THA).
    Norman TL; Shultz T; Noble G; Gruen TA; Blaha JD
    J Biomech; 2013 Mar; 46(5):949-55. PubMed ID: 23357700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Performance of vertebral cancellous bone augmented with compliant PMMA under dynamic loads.
    Boger A; Bohner M; Heini P; Schwieger K; Schneider E
    Acta Biomater; 2008 Nov; 4(6):1688-93. PubMed ID: 18678533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mechanical properties of vacuum-mixed acrylic bone cement.
    Lewis G; Austin GE
    J Appl Biomater; 1994; 5(4):307-14. PubMed ID: 8580537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Mathematical simulation of stem/cement/bone mechanical interactions for Poldi-Cech, CF-30, MS-30 and PFC femoral components].
    Kovanda M; Havlícek V; Hudec J
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Apr; 76(2):110-5. PubMed ID: 19439130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fatigue is more damaging than creep in ligament revealed by modulus reduction and residual strength.
    Thornton GM; Schwab TD; Oxland TR
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2007 Oct; 35(10):1713-21. PubMed ID: 17629791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stiffness optimisation of cement and stem materials in total hip replacement.
    Hedia HS
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2001; 11(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 11281574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. New polymer materials in total hip arthroplasty. Evaluation with radiostereometry, bone densitometry, radiography and clinical parameters.
    Digas G
    Acta Orthop Suppl; 2005 Feb; 76(315):3-82. PubMed ID: 15790289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bone-particle-impregnated bone cement: an in vitro study.
    Liu YK; Park JB; Njus GO; Stienstra D
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1987 Feb; 21(2):247-61. PubMed ID: 3818684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Acrylic bone cements: influence of time and environment on physical properties.
    Nottrott M
    Acta Orthop Suppl; 2010 Jun; 81(341):1-27. PubMed ID: 20486859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparative FEA of the debonding process in different concepts of cemented hip implants.
    Pérez MA; García-Aznar JM; Doblaré M; Seral B; Seral F
    Med Eng Phys; 2006 Jul; 28(6):525-33. PubMed ID: 16257253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.