328 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7622850)
1. The accuracy of automated blood pressure measuring devices in patients with controlled atrial fibrillation.
Stewart MJ; Gough K; Padfield PL
J Hypertens; 1995 Mar; 13(3):297-300. PubMed ID: 7622850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validation of the Omron M5-I, R5-I and HEM-907 automated blood pressure monitors in elderly individuals according to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension.
Omboni S; Riva I; Giglio A; Caldara G; Groppelli A; Parati G
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Aug; 12(4):233-42. PubMed ID: 17625396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical blood pressure measurement verification when comparing a Tensoval duo control device with a mercury sphygmomanometer in patients suffering from atrial fibrillation.
Farsky S; Benova K; Krausova D; Sirotiaková J; Vysocanova P
Blood Press Monit; 2011 Oct; 16(5):252-7. PubMed ID: 21914986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validation of the HEM-780REL with easy wrap cuff for self-measurement of blood pressure according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol.
Viera AJ; Hinderliter AL
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Oct; 12(5):335-8. PubMed ID: 17890973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Is ambulatory blood pressure monitoring reliable in hypertensive patients with atrial fibrillation?].
Almeida L; Amado P; Vasconcelos N; Santos I; Alves J; Teles J; Nazaré J; Carmona J
Rev Port Cardiol; 2001 Jun; 20(6):647-50. PubMed ID: 11529254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The trained observer better predicts daytime ABPM diastolic blood pressure in hypertensive patients than does an automated (Omron) device.
Graves JW; Grossardt BR; Gullerud RE; Bailey KR; Feldstein J
Blood Press Monit; 2006 Apr; 11(2):53-8. PubMed ID: 16534405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of noninvasive blood pressure measurements in patients with atrial fibrillation.
Anastas ZM; Jimerson E; Garolis S
J Cardiovasc Nurs; 2008; 23(6):519-24; quiz 525-6. PubMed ID: 18953216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy of ambulatory blood pressure monitors in routine clinical practice.
Pang TC; Brown MA
Am J Hypertens; 2006 Aug; 19(8):801-9. PubMed ID: 16876678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Automated blood pressure measurement in special situations: patients with chronic atrial fibrillation or chronic aortic regurgitation.
Eckert S; Gleichmann S; Gleichmann U
Z Kardiol; 1996; 85 Suppl 3():92-8. PubMed ID: 8896307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Measurements of blood pressure with various techniques in daily practice: uncertainty in diagnosing office hypertension with short-term in-hospital registration of blood pressure.
Braun HJ; Rabouw H; Werner H; van Montfrans GA; de Stigter C; Zwinderman AH
Blood Press Monit; 1999 Apr; 4(2):59-64. PubMed ID: 10450115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validation of three oscillometric blood pressure devices against auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer in children.
Wong SN; Tz Sung RY; Leung LC
Blood Press Monit; 2006 Oct; 11(5):281-91. PubMed ID: 16932037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validation of the Omron 637IT wrist blood pressure measuring device with a position sensor according to the International Protocol in adults and obese adults.
Altunkan S; Oztaş K; Altunkan E
Blood Press Monit; 2006 Apr; 11(2):79-85. PubMed ID: 16534409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: validation of the accuracy and reliability of the TM-2420 according to the AAMI recommendations.
Clark S; Fowlie S; Coats A; Radaelli A; van der Putt M; Bird R; Conway J
J Hum Hypertens; 1991 Apr; 5(2):77-82. PubMed ID: 2072370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Comparison of ambulatory blood pressure determinations using the Remler and Spacelabs devices].
Pagny JY; Chatellier G; Devriès C; Janod JP; Corvol P; Ménard J
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1986 Jun; 79(6):901-6. PubMed ID: 3099709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validation of the Samsung SBM-100A and Microlife BP 3BU1-5 wrist blood pressure measuring devices in adults according to the International Protocol.
Altunkan S; Ilman N; Altunkan E
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Apr; 12(2):119-25. PubMed ID: 17353656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Validation of the Omron M6 (HEM-7001-E) upper-arm blood pressure measuring device according to the International Protocol in adults and obese adults.
Altunkan S; Ilman N; Kayatürk N; Altunkan E
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Aug; 12(4):219-25. PubMed ID: 17625394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of blood pressure measurements between an automated oscillometric device and a Hawksley random-zero sphygmomanometer in the northern Sweden MONICA study.
Eriksson M; Carlberg B; Jansson JH
Blood Press Monit; 2012 Aug; 17(4):164-70. PubMed ID: 22781634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Does the Hawksley random zero sphygmomanometer underestimate blood pressure, and by how much?
Mackie A; Whincup P; McKinnon M
J Hum Hypertens; 1995 May; 9(5):337-43. PubMed ID: 7623370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Home self-monitoring of blood pressure: is fully automated oscillometric technique as good as conventional stethoscopic technique?
Stergiou GS; Voutsa AV; Achimastos AD; Mountokalakis TD
Am J Hypertens; 1997 Apr; 10(4 Pt 1):428-33. PubMed ID: 9128209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validation of TM-2655 oscillometric device for blood pressure measurement.
Kobalava ZD; Kotovskaya YV; Babaeva LA; Moiseev VS
Blood Press Monit; 2006 Apr; 11(2):87-90. PubMed ID: 16534410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
