These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7623360)
1. Manchester procedure vs. vaginal hysterectomy for uterine prolapse. A comparison. Thomas AG; Brodman ML; Dottino PR; Bodian C; Friedman F; Bogursky E J Reprod Med; 1995 Apr; 40(4):299-304. PubMed ID: 7623360 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of surgical and postoperative complications of vaginal hysterectomy and Manchester procedure. Kalogirou D; Antoniou G; Karakitsos P; Kalogirou O Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 1996; 17(4):278-80. PubMed ID: 8856304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Manchester procedure versus vaginal hysterectomy in the treatment of uterine prolapse: a review. Tolstrup CK; Lose G; Klarskov N Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Jan; 28(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 27485234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Laparoscopic vs vaginal hysterectomy for benign pathology. Candiani M; Izzo S; Bulfoni A; Riparini J; Ronzoni S; Marconi A Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Apr; 200(4):368.e1-7. PubMed ID: 19136094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Uterus preservation in surgical correction of urogenital prolapse. Costantini E; Mearini L; Bini V; Zucchi A; Mearini E; Porena M Eur Urol; 2005 Oct; 48(4):642-9. PubMed ID: 15964131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of laparascopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy and radical abdominal hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer. Steed H; Rosen B; Murphy J; Laframboise S; De Petrillo D; Covens A Gynecol Oncol; 2004 Jun; 93(3):588-93. PubMed ID: 15196849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bilateral iliococcygeal fixation for vaginal vault prolapse and enterocele repair using a new suturing device--the digital needle driver. Krissi H; Stanton SL BJOG; 2005 Aug; 112(8):1145-9. PubMed ID: 16045532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Is hysterectomy necessary for laparoscopic pelvic floor repair? A prospective study. Rosen DM; Shukla A; Cario GM; Carlton MA; Chou D J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(6):729-34. PubMed ID: 18971137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Risk of mesh extrusion and other mesh-related complications after laparoscopic sacral colpopexy with or without concurrent laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: experience of 402 patients. Stepanian AA; Miklos JR; Moore RD; Mattox TF J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(2):188-96. PubMed ID: 18312989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women: a short version Cochrane review. Maher C; Baessler K; Glazener CM; Adams EJ; Hagen S Neurourol Urodyn; 2008; 27(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 18092333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Positive symptom improvement with laparoscopic uterosacral ligament repair for uterine or vaginal vault prolapse: interim results from an active multicenter trial. Schwartz M; Abbott KR; Glazerman L; Sobolewski C; Jarnagin B; Ailawadi R; Lucente V J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007; 14(5):570-6. PubMed ID: 17848317 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of total laparoscopic, vaginal and abdominal hysterectomy. Schindlbeck C; Klauser K; Dian D; Janni W; Friese K Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2008 Apr; 277(4):331-7. PubMed ID: 17938945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Anterior vaginal suspension for vaginal vault prolapse. Juma S Tech Urol; 1995; 1(3):150-6. PubMed ID: 9118384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Balci technique for suspending vaginal vault at vaginal hysterectomy with reduced risk of vaginal vault prolapse. Balci O; Capar M; Acar A; Colakoglu MC J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2011 Jul; 37(7):762-9. PubMed ID: 21395901 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Perioperative course and long term outcome after vaginal sacrospinous colpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse post hysterectomy: comparison of three different suture methods. Marcickiewicz J; Kjöllesdal M; Brännström M J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2008 Dec; 34(6):1026-31. PubMed ID: 19012703 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Manchester-Fothergill procedure versus vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension: a matched historical cohort study. Tolstrup CK; Husby KR; Lose G; Kopp TI; Viborg PH; Kesmodel US; Klarskov N Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Mar; 29(3):431-440. PubMed ID: 29288346 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Long-term outcome of vaginal sacrospinous colpopexy for marked uterovaginal and vault prolapse. Hefni MA; El-Toukhy TA Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2006 Aug; 127(2):257-63. PubMed ID: 16377061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Manchester repair. An alternative to hysterectomy. Rouzi AA; Sahly NN; Shobkshi AS; Abduljabbar HS Saudi Med J; 2009 Nov; 30(11):1473-5. PubMed ID: 19882064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Combined genital prolapse repair reinforced with a polypropylene mesh and tension-free vaginal tape in women with genital prolapse and stress urinary incontinence: a retrospective case-control study with short-term follow-up. de Tayrac R; Gervaise A; Chauveaud-Lambling A; Fernandez H Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2004 Oct; 83(10):950-4. PubMed ID: 15453892 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Vaginal hysterectomy by uterine morcellation: an efficient, non-morbid procedure. Mazdisnian F; Kurzel RB; Coe S; Bosuk M; Montz F Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jul; 86(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 7784024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]