116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 762380)
1. Static vs dynamic visual field evaluation; with emphasis on the utility of the Friedmann Visual Field Analyzer.
Yellen M; Sherman J
J Am Optom Assoc; 1979 Jan; 50(1):95-9. PubMed ID: 762380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Poly-static quantitative perimetry for detection of open angle glaucoma].
Lai Z; Lao Y; Ai F
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2000 Mar; 36(2):129-30. PubMed ID: 11853601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Evaluation of the Friedmann visual field analyser in detecting glaucoma damage].
Xu LA
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 1989 Mar; 25(2):80-3. PubMed ID: 2507257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Visual field assessment in glaucoma: comparative evaluation of manual kinetic Goldmann perimetry and automated static perimetry.
Agarwal HC; Gulati V; Sihota R
Indian J Ophthalmol; 2000 Dec; 48(4):301-6. PubMed ID: 11340889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Measurement of Friedmann Visual Field Analyzer tests in primary open-angle glaucoma.
Cox MJ; Wood IC
Optom Vis Sci; 1993 May; 70(5):421-32. PubMed ID: 8515973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Automatic perimetry in detecting early glaucomatous visual field defects. A follow-up study.
Chen XM; Wu ZZ; Jiang YQ
Chin Med J (Engl); 1992 Apr; 105(4):298-301. PubMed ID: 1618011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [The volume of vision in computerized static perimetry in the diagnosis and observation o f glaucoma].
Dudzinski A; Zawojski A
Klin Oczna; 1989 Jun; 91(6):152-3. PubMed ID: 2698975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Automated and semiautomated perimetry. Comparative trial of 3 devices (Baylor programmer, Friedmann Mark II campimeter, Octopus 2000 R.)].
Pradines F; Delbosc B; Royer J
J Fr Ophtalmol; 1985; 8(2):173-85. PubMed ID: 3891833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The use of visual field indices in detecting changes in the visual field in glaucoma.
Chauhan BC; Drance SM; Douglas GR
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1990 Mar; 31(3):512-20. PubMed ID: 2318590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A frequency-doubling perimetric study in normal-tension glaucoma with hemifield defect.
Kondo Y; Yamamoto T; Sato Y; Matsubara M; Kitazawa Y
J Glaucoma; 1998 Aug; 7(4):261-5. PubMed ID: 9713784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Methods for screening the visual field for glaucoma].
Volkov VV
Vestn Oftalmol; 1998; 114(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 9584628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Blue-on-yellow visual field and retinal nerve fiber layer in ocular hypertension and glaucoma.
Teesalu P; Airaksinen PJ; Tuulonen A
Ophthalmology; 1998 Nov; 105(11):2077-81. PubMed ID: 9818609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Feasibility of saccadic vector optokinetic perimetry: a method of automated static perimetry for children using eye tracking.
Murray IC; Fleck BW; Brash HM; Macrae ME; Tan LL; Minns RA
Ophthalmology; 2009 Oct; 116(10):2017-26. PubMed ID: 19560207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Evaluation of the central visual field by the Friedmann Mark I analyzer and color vision in 85 patients with multiple sclerosis. Correlation with visual evoked potentials in 50 cases].
Grochowicki M; Vighetto A
J Fr Ophtalmol; 1988; 11(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 3385126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Threshold and variability properties of matrix frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma.
Artes PH; Hutchison DM; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Chauhan BC
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 46(7):2451-7. PubMed ID: 15980235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Aphakic visual fields by automated perimetry.
Miller BA; Gelber EC
Ann Ophthalmol; 1990 Nov; 22(11):419-22. PubMed ID: 2264664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Visual acuity perimetry. Detection of glaucomatous visual field defects].
Reiser EM; Lachenmayr BJ; Vivell PM
Ophthalmologe; 1992 Dec; 89(6):472-6. PubMed ID: 1486263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Application of frequency doubling technology perimetry in the diagnosis of glaucoma].
Kawa P; Jurkowska J; Zarnowski T; Zagórski Z
Klin Oczna; 2002; 104(5-6):391-4. PubMed ID: 12664488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Interpreting glaucoma progression by white-on-white perimetry.
Tan JC; Franks WA; Hitchings RA
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2002 Jul; 240(7):585-92. PubMed ID: 12136293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Comparison of SKP (semi-automated kinetic perimetry) and SASP (suprathreshold automated static perimetry) techniques in patients with advanced glaucoma].
Nowomiejska K; Paetzold J; Krapp E; Rejdak R; Zagórski Z; Schiefer U
Klin Oczna; 2004; 106(1-2 Suppl):231-3. PubMed ID: 15510509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
