These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7626280)
1. An introduction to magnetoencephalography with some applications. Papanicolaou AC Brain Cogn; 1995 Apr; 27(3):331-52. PubMed ID: 7626280 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Transient brain responses predict the temporal dynamics of sound detection in humans. Mäkinen V; May P; Tiitinen H Neuroimage; 2004 Feb; 21(2):701-6. PubMed ID: 14980572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Systematic latency variation of the auditory evoked M100: from average to single-trial data. Salajegheh A; Link A; Elster C; Burghoff M; Sander T; Trahms L; Poeppel D Neuroimage; 2004 Sep; 23(1):288-95. PubMed ID: 15325376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Auditory evoked fields to variations of interaural time delay. Soeta Y; Nakagawa S; Tonoike M Neurosci Lett; 2005 Aug; 383(3):311-6. PubMed ID: 15955427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Serial and parallel processing in the human auditory cortex: a magnetoencephalographic study. Inui K; Okamoto H; Miki K; Gunji A; Kakigi R Cereb Cortex; 2006 Jan; 16(1):18-30. PubMed ID: 15800024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Detecting and correcting for head movements in neuromagnetic measurements. Uutela K; Taulu S; Hämäläinen M Neuroimage; 2001 Dec; 14(6):1424-31. PubMed ID: 11707098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evidence for dissociation of spatial and nonspatial auditory information processing. Anourova I; Nikouline VV; Ilmoniemi RJ; Hotta J; Aronen HJ; Carlson S Neuroimage; 2001 Dec; 14(6):1268-77. PubMed ID: 11707083 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The influence of stimulus properties, complexity, and contingency on the stability and variability of ongoing and evoked activity in human auditory cortex. Ioannides AA; Taylor JG; Liu LC; Gross J; Müller-Gärtner HW Neuroimage; 1998 Aug; 8(2):149-62. PubMed ID: 9740758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ipsilateral movement-evoked fields reconsidered. Hari R; Imada T Neuroimage; 1999 Nov; 10(5):582-8. PubMed ID: 10547335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of the binaural auditory filter in the human brain. Soeta Y; Nakagawa S Neuroreport; 2007 Dec; 18(18):1939-43. PubMed ID: 18007191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The M100 component of evoked magnetic fields differs by scaling factors: implications for signal averaging. Zacharias N; Sielużycki C; Kordecki W; König R; Heil P Psychophysiology; 2011 Aug; 48(8):1069-82. PubMed ID: 21342204 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Neuromagnetic recordings reveal the temporal dynamics of auditory spatial processing in the human cortex. Tiitinen H; Salminen NH; Palomäki KJ; Mäkinen VT; Alku P; May PJ Neurosci Lett; 2006 Mar; 396(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 16343772 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fully complex magnetoencephalography. Simon JZ; Wang Y J Neurosci Methods; 2005 Nov; 149(1):64-73. PubMed ID: 16026851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Healthy-side dominance of middle- and long-latency neuromagnetic fields in idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss. Li LP; Shiao AS; Chen LF; Niddam DM; Chang SY; Lien CF; Lee SK; Hsieh JC Eur J Neurosci; 2006 Aug; 24(3):937-46. PubMed ID: 16930421 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Time course and hemispheric lateralization effects of complex pitch processing: evoked magnetic fields in response to rippled noise stimuli. Hertrich I; Mathiak K; Lutzenberger W; Ackermann H Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(13):1814-26. PubMed ID: 15351630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Magnetoencephalographic studies of auditory system function. Jacobson GP J Clin Neurophysiol; 1994 May; 11(3):343-64. PubMed ID: 8089205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Neuromagnetic responses to binaural beat in human cerebral cortex. Karino S; Yumoto M; Itoh K; Uno A; Yamakawa K; Sekimoto S; Kaga K J Neurophysiol; 2006 Oct; 96(4):1927-38. PubMed ID: 16790592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Hemispheric asymmetry of auditory evoked fields elicited by spectral versus temporal stimulus change. Okamoto H; Stracke H; Draganova R; Pantev C Cereb Cortex; 2009 Oct; 19(10):2290-7. PubMed ID: 19136454 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Movement-related magnetic fields to tongue protrusion. Nakasato N; Itoh H; Hatanaka K; Nakahara H; Kanno A; Yoshimoto T Neuroimage; 2001 Oct; 14(4):924-35. PubMed ID: 11554811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Magnetoencephalography is feasible for infant assessment of auditory discrimination. Cheour M; Imada T; Taulu S; Ahonen A; Salonen J; Kuhl P Exp Neurol; 2004 Nov; 190 Suppl 1():S44-51. PubMed ID: 15498541 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]