These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7627310)

  • 21. Scientific misconduct in US health service.
    Choo V
    Lancet; 1995 May; 345(8961):1359. PubMed ID: 11644692
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The federal role in influencing research ethics education and standards in science.
    Dustira AK
    Prof Ethics; 1996; 5(1-2):139-56. PubMed ID: 11813726
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Science police.
    Dolnick E
    Discover; 1994 Feb; 15(2):56-63. PubMed ID: 11653089
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Science and law clash over fraud-case appeals.
    Hilts PJ
    N Y Times Web; 1993 Nov; ():B10. PubMed ID: 11647010
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Imanishi-Kari ruling slams ORI.
    Kaiser J; Marshall E
    Science; 1996 Jun; 272(5270):1864-5. PubMed ID: 8658151
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. 'Unrealistic' misconduct plans under fire.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 1996 May; 381(6580):263. PubMed ID: 8692255
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Hostile reception to US misconduct report.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 1996 Jun; 381(6584):639. PubMed ID: 8649502
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Misconduct and social control in science: issues, problems, solutions.
    Fox MF; Braxton JM
    J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):373-83. PubMed ID: 11653368
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Whistleblowing: a very unpleasant avocation.
    Sprague RL
    Ethics Behav; 1993; 3(1):103-33. PubMed ID: 11653080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. An end to fraud?
    Nature; 1993 Nov; 366(6451):95-6. PubMed ID: 8232562
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. NIH finds fraud in cell paper.
    Hamilton DP
    Science; 1991 Mar; 251(5001):1552-4. PubMed ID: 2011731
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A question of "fitness.
    Hamilton DP
    Science; 1990 Jun; 248(4963):198. PubMed ID: 11642777
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A judgement fit for prime time.
    Nature; 1996 Jun; 381(6585):717. PubMed ID: 8657262
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The pathology of research fraud: the history and politics of the US experience.
    Lafollette MC
    J Intern Med; 1994 Feb; 235(2):129-35. PubMed ID: 8308475
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Scientific misconduct cases revealed.
    Palca J
    Science; 1990 Apr; 248(4953):297. PubMed ID: 2326642
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Falsifying data is main problem in US research fraud review.
    Pownall M
    BMJ; 1999 May; 318(7192):1164. PubMed ID: 10221931
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. NIH misconduct probes draw legal complaints.
    Culliton BJ
    Science; 1990 Jul; 249(4966):240-2. PubMed ID: 2374923
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The demise of the social contract for science: misconduct in science and the nonmodern world.
    Guston DH
    Centen Rev; 1994; 38(2):215-48. PubMed ID: 11656758
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Fraud in research, 1986-1992: an annotated bibliography.
    Anderson J
    J Infor Ethics; 1994; 3(2):64-89. PubMed ID: 11656481
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Improving the scientific misconduct hearing process.
    Parrish DM
    JAMA; 1997 Apr 23-30; 277(16):1315-9. PubMed ID: 9109472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.