187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7627365)
1. Reworking autonomy: toward a feminist perspective.
Donchin A
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1995; 4(1):44-55. PubMed ID: 7627365
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Patient accountability and quality of care: lessons from medical consumerism and the patients' rights, women's health and disability rights movements.
Rodwin MA
Am J Law Med; 1994; 20(1-2):147-67. PubMed ID: 7801975
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Legal embodiment: analysing the body of healthcare law.
Fletcher R; Fox M; McCandless J
Med Law Rev; 2008; 16(3):321-45. PubMed ID: 18641395
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Is the right to health a necessary precondition for gender equality?
Hammell H
Rev Law Soc Change; 2011; 35(1):131-93. PubMed ID: 21936123
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Further evidence on the internal validity of the early legal access research design.
Bailey MJ; Guldi M; Hershbein BJ
J Policy Anal Manage; 2013; 32(4):899-904. PubMed ID: 24665473
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Four approaches to doing ethics.
Levi BH
J Med Philos; 1996 Feb; 21(1):7-39. PubMed ID: 8740882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The supreme court and the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003: a political procedure replaces woman-centered care.
Blumenthal PD; Winikoff B
MedGenMed; 2007 Jun; 9(2):52. PubMed ID: 17955106
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. If only policy analysis were so easy.
Joyce T
J Policy Anal Manage; 2013; 32(4):897-9. PubMed ID: 24665472
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Feminist and medical ethics: two different approaches to contextual ethics.
Sherwin S
Hypatia; 1989; 4(2):57-72. PubMed ID: 11650331
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A review of gender-specific legislation, 1999.
Howes J; Bass M
J Gend Specif Med; 1999; 2(6):18-20. PubMed ID: 11279866
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Reproductive rights and the medical care system: a plea for rational health policy.
Stephenson PA; Wagner MG
J Public Health Policy; 1993; 14(2):174-82. PubMed ID: 8408608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. How important was the Pill to women's economic well-being? If Roe v. Wade were overturned, how might society change?
Joyce T
J Policy Anal Manage; 2013; 32(4):879-87. PubMed ID: 24665470
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Interview with Michelle Oberman, JD, MPH.
Oberman M
Qual Manag Health Care; 2000; 8(4):87-90. PubMed ID: 11183587
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Abortion patients' perceptions of abortion regulation.
Cockrill K; Weitz TA
Womens Health Issues; 2010; 20(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 20123172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Women and the health care system.
McKenzie N; Bilofsky E; Lerner S
Health PAC Bull; 1992; 22(2):3-5, 35. PubMed ID: 10121386
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A feminist challenge to practices of medicine.
Wallace KA
J Clin Ethics; 1994; 5(1):70-5. PubMed ID: 11644538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Feminism and bioethics: an overview.
Lebacqz K
Second Opin; 1991 Oct; 17(2):11-25. PubMed ID: 10115320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Recent evidence on the broad benefits of reproductive health policy.
Bailey MJ; Guldi M; Hershbein BJ
J Policy Anal Manage; 2013; 32(4):888-96. PubMed ID: 24665471
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. In pursuit of perfect choice. Feminism and reproductive technology.
Ross L
Health PAC Bull; 1992; 22(2):8-11. PubMed ID: 10121387
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. International human rights and women's reproductive health.
Cook RJ
Stud Fam Plann; 1993; 24(2):73-86. PubMed ID: 8511808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
