These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7627759)

  • 21. Intraocular pressure measurements and corneal biomechanical properties using a dynamic Scheimpflug analyzer, after several keratoplasty techniques, versus normal eyes.
    Hugo J; Granget E; Ho Wang Yin G; Sampo M; Hoffart L
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2018 Jan; 41(1):30-38. PubMed ID: 29191679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Can Corneal Biomechanical Properties Explain Difference in Tonometric Measurement in Normal Eyes?
    Dey A; David RL; Asokan R; George R
    Optom Vis Sci; 2018 Feb; 95(2):120-128. PubMed ID: 29370019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effects of corneal thickness, corneal curvature, and intraocular pressure level on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry.
    Francis BA; Hsieh A; Lai MY; Chopra V; Pena F; Azen S; Varma R;
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Jan; 114(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 17070592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Epithelial and corneal thickness measurements by high-frequency ultrasound digital signal processing.
    Reinstein DZ; Silverman RH; Rondeau MJ; Coleman DJ
    Ophthalmology; 1994 Jan; 101(1):140-6. PubMed ID: 8302547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The Relationship between Corvis ST Tonometry Measured Corneal Parameters and Intraocular Pressure, Corneal Thickness and Corneal Curvature.
    Asaoka R; Nakakura S; Tabuchi H; Murata H; Nakao Y; Ihara N; Rimayanti U; Aihara M; Kiuchi Y
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0140385. PubMed ID: 26485129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Relationship Between Corneal Hysteresis and Corneal Resistance Factor with Other Ocular Parameters.
    Rosa N; Lanza M; De Bernardo M; Signoriello G; Chiodini P
    Semin Ophthalmol; 2015; 30(5-6):335-9. PubMed ID: 24506466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effect of aging on corneal biomechanical parameters using the ocular response analyzer.
    Kamiya K; Shimizu K; Ohmoto F
    J Refract Surg; 2009 Oct; 25(10):888-93. PubMed ID: 19835329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effect of central corneal thickness, corneal curvature, and axial length on applanation tonometry.
    Kohlhaas M; Boehm AG; Spoerl E; Pürsten A; Grein HJ; Pillunat LE
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2006 Apr; 124(4):471-6. PubMed ID: 16606871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Corneal Biomechanical Properties in High Myopia Measured by Dynamic Scheimpflug Imaging Technology.
    He M; Wang W; Ding H; Zhong X
    Optom Vis Sci; 2017 Dec; 94(12):1074-1080. PubMed ID: 29135719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluation of the influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure measurements using the ocular response analyzer.
    Medeiros FA; Weinreb RN
    J Glaucoma; 2006 Oct; 15(5):364-70. PubMed ID: 16988597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Corneal biomechanics measured with the ocular response analyser in patients with unilateral open-angle glaucoma.
    Hirneiss C; Neubauer AS; Yu A; Kampik A; Kernt M
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2011 Mar; 89(2):e189-92. PubMed ID: 21288308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [The influence of corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor on the measurement of intraocular pressure].
    Hager A; Schroeder B; Sadeghi M; Grossherr M; Wiegand W
    Ophthalmologe; 2007 Jun; 104(6):484-9. PubMed ID: 17587093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Numerical analysis of corneal curvature dynamics based on Corvis tonometer images.
    Kasprzak H; Boszczyk A
    J Biophotonics; 2016 May; 9(5):436-44. PubMed ID: 26997615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Changes in biomechanical properties of the cornea and intraocular pressure after myopic laser in situ keratomileusis using a femtosecond laser for flap creation determined using ocular response analyzer and Goldmann applanation tonometry.
    Shin J; Kim TW; Park SJ; Yoon M; Lee JW
    J Glaucoma; 2015 Mar; 24(3):195-201. PubMed ID: 23807345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure measurement: quantitative analysis.
    Liu J; Roberts CJ
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Jan; 31(1):146-55. PubMed ID: 15721707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The elastic modulus of central and perilimbal bovine cornea.
    Reichel E; Miller D; Blanco E; Mastanduno R
    Ann Ophthalmol; 1989 Jun; 21(6):205-8. PubMed ID: 2764431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Goldmann applanation tonometer versus ocular response analyzer for measuring intraocular pressure after congenital cataract surgery.
    Feizi S; Faramarzi A; Kheiri B
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2018 Sep; 28(5):582-589. PubMed ID: 30246567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Diurnal variation of corneal shape and thickness.
    Read SA; Collins MJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 2009 Mar; 86(3):170-80. PubMed ID: 19182699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [The influence of corneal thickness and curvature on the difference between intraocular pressure measurements obtained with a non-contact tonometer and those with a Goldmann applanation tonometer].
    Matsumoto T; Makino H; Uozato H; Saishin M; Miyamoto S
    Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 2000 May; 104(5):317-23. PubMed ID: 10835885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The effect of an artificially elevated intraocular pressure on the central corneal curvature.
    Lam AK; Douthwaite WA
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1997 Jan; 17(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 9135808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.