These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7628204)

  • 1. Neutralizing pH of lidocaine reduces pain during Norplant system insertion procedure.
    Nelson AL
    Contraception; 1995 May; 51(5):299-301. PubMed ID: 7628204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Immediate postpartum insertion of the norplant contraceptive device.
    Molland JR; Morehead DB; Baldwin DM; Castracane VD; Lasley B; Bergquist CA
    Fertil Steril; 1996 Jul; 66(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 8752609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Norplant System: easy to insert, easy to remove.
    Wehrle KE
    Nurse Pract; 1994 Apr; 19(4):47-54. PubMed ID: 8035961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Characteristics and experiences of American women electing for early removal of contraceptive implants.
    Frank ML; Ditmore JR; Ilegbodu AE; Bateman L; Poindexter AN
    Contraception; 1995 Sep; 52(3):159-65. PubMed ID: 7587187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Timing of onset of contraceptive effectiveness in Norplant implant users. Part I. Changes in cervical mucus.
    Dunson TR; Blumenthal PD; Alvarez F; Brache V; Cochon L; Dalberth B; Glover L; Remsburg R; Vu K; Katz D
    Fertil Steril; 1998 Feb; 69(2):258-66. PubMed ID: 9496339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Insulin sensitivity is unaltered by the use of the Norplant subdermal implant contraceptive.
    Koopersmith TB; Lobo RA
    Contraception; 1995 Mar; 51(3):197-200. PubMed ID: 7621688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing the acceptability of Norplant contraceptive in four patient populations.
    Dugoff L; Jones OW; Allen-Davis J; Hurst BS; Schlaff WD
    Contraception; 1995 Jul; 52(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 8521714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Preliminary experience with Norplant in an inner city population.
    Cullins VE; Blumenthal PD; Remsburg RE; Huggins GR
    Contraception; 1993 Feb; 47(2):193-203. PubMed ID: 8449019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A preliminary report of Norplant implant insertions in a large urban family planning program.
    Crosby UD; Schwarz BE; Gluck KL; Heartwell SF
    Contraception; 1993 Oct; 48(4):359-66. PubMed ID: 8222663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Post-Norplant implants insertion anaphylactoid reaction: a case report.
    Gbolade BA
    Contraception; 1997 May; 55(5):319-20. PubMed ID: 9220231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Decreasing the pain of local anesthesia: a prospective, double-blind comparison of buffered, premixed 1% lidocaine with epinephrine versus 1% lidocaine freshly mixed with epinephrine.
    Burns CA; Ferris G; Feng C; Cooper JZ; Brown MD
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2006 Jan; 54(1):128-31. PubMed ID: 16384767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of preovulatory insertion of Norplant implants over luteinizing hormone secretion and follicular development.
    Brache V; Alvarez F; Faundes A; Cochon L; Thevenin F
    Fertil Steril; 1996 Jun; 65(6):1110-4. PubMed ID: 8641481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reducing the discomfort of lidocaine administration through pH buffering.
    Matsumoto AH; Reifsnyder AC; Hartwell GD; Angle JF; Selby JB; Tegtmeyer CJ
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 1994; 5(1):171-5. PubMed ID: 8136599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A five-year clinical evaluation of Norplant contraceptive subdermal implants in Bangladeshi acceptors.
    Akhter H; Dunson TR; Amatya RN; Begum K; Chowdhury T; Dighe N; Krueger SL; Rahman S
    Contraception; 1993 Jun; 47(6):569-82. PubMed ID: 8334891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Use of Norplant contraceptive implants in the immediate postpartum period: safety and tolerance.
    Phemister DA; Laurent S; Harrison FN
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jan; 172(1 Pt 1):175-9. PubMed ID: 7847530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Use of Norplant implants in a New York City clinic population.
    Gerber S; Westhoff C; Lopez M; Gordon L
    Contraception; 1994 Jun; 49(6):557-64. PubMed ID: 8070260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Double-blind, bilateral pain comparison with simultaneous injection of 2% lidocaine versus buffered 2% lidocaine for periocular anesthesia.
    Welch MN; Czyz CN; Kalwerisky K; Holck DE; Mihora LD
    Ophthalmology; 2012 Oct; 119(10):2048-52. PubMed ID: 22771049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Emory method: a modified approach to Norplant implants removal.
    Sarma SP; Hatcher R
    Contraception; 1994 Jun; 49(6):551-6. PubMed ID: 8070259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use of buffered lidocaine in bone marrow biopsies: a randomized, controlled trial.
    Ruegg TA; Curran CR; Lamb T
    Oncol Nurs Forum; 2009 Jan; 36(1):52-60. PubMed ID: 19136338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Metabolic parameter, bleeding, and weight changes in U.S. women using progestin only contraceptives.
    Mainwaring R; Hales HA; Stevenson K; Hatasaka HH; Poulson AM; Jones KP; Peterson CM
    Contraception; 1995 Mar; 51(3):149-53. PubMed ID: 7621683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.