These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7628320)

  • 1. [The confidentiality duty of the hospital physician versus that of the family physician. The judgement of the Munich Higher Regional Court of 17 September 1992].
    Rieger HJ
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1995 Jul; 120(30):1057-9. PubMed ID: 7628320
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [The opening of physician mail in the hospital. The judgement of the Higher Labor Court of Niedersachsen of 15 September 1993].
    Rieger HJ
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1994 Jun; 119(22):822-3. PubMed ID: 8205946
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [The authorization of hospital physicians on referrals by established colleagues. The judgement of the State Higher Social Court of Rheinland-Pfalz of 19 December 1991].
    Rieger HJ
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1992 Oct; 117(44):1690-2. PubMed ID: 1425275
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A classical dilemma.
    Sbaih L
    Accid Emerg Nurs; 1999 Jul; 7(3):179-81. PubMed ID: 10693390
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Special problems of confidentiality in hospitals from the legal point of view].
    Jansen C
    Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 1999 Dec; 93(10):739-45;discussion 753. PubMed ID: 10683891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Do medical consultations share in liquidation proceeds of the chief physician--decision of the Lower Saxony Medical Profession Court 17 November 2004--BG 17/02].
    Rieger HJ
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2005 Jun; 130(24):1516-7. PubMed ID: 15942843
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [The attendance and residency duty of the staff physician. The judgement of the Higher Social Court of Baden-Württemberg of 14 July 1999].
    Rieger HJ
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2000 Mar; 125(9):269-71. PubMed ID: 10742820
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Have doctor-pickets the right to direct patients elsewhere?
    Med World News; 1979 Oct; 20(20):45. PubMed ID: 10243635
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Revocation of a work disability certificate and the medical duty of confidentiality. The judgement of the Oldenburg Regional Court of 24 January 1995].
    Rieger HJ
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1996 Feb; 121(5):146-7. PubMed ID: 8717200
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A pain in the back case.
    Bird S
    Aust Fam Physician; 2004 Jun; 33(6):457-8. PubMed ID: 15253611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Federal court refuses to honor state statutory privilege for proceedings of medical staff credentials committee.
    Schwartz RL
    Health Law Vigil; 1981 Nov; 4(23):4-5. PubMed ID: 10253107
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. California court refuses to extend protection of medical staff information outside the realm of committee setting.
    Riley SM
    Health Matrix; 1986; 4(3):37-8. PubMed ID: 10324441
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. CA appellate court reaffirms statutory prohibition against discovery of medical staff proceedings and records.
    Kadzielski MA
    Health Law Vigil; 1984 Apr; 7(8):6. PubMed ID: 10265829
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Wyoming court interprets state peer review shield law.
    Hosp Law Newsl; 1989 May; 6(7):7-8. PubMed ID: 10294155
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [After all: More than one permanent medical proxy allowed : OLG strengthens the position of private invoicing-entitled chief physicians].
    Wienke A; Martenstein I
    HNO; 2016 Sep; 64(9):680-2. PubMed ID: 27090646
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Family feud.
    Prather E
    Tex Med; 2005 Dec; 101(12):37-9. PubMed ID: 17094499
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [The duty of medical confidentiality in regard to the courts. The decision of the Social Court of Frankfurt a. M. of 24 September 1998].
    Rieger HJ
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1999 Sep; 124(36):1052-3. PubMed ID: 10506844
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Another battle. HIPAA threatens doc referrals in soliciting donations.
    Jaklevic MC
    Mod Healthc; 2002 May; 32(18):14-5. PubMed ID: 12037920
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [The precedence of the admissibility of the hospital for ambulatory surgery over the authority of the chief physician? The judgement of the Federal Social Court of 9 June 1999].
    Rieger HJ
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2000 Jul; 125(27):845-6. PubMed ID: 10929541
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Not Available].
    Wienke A; Martenstein I
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2016 Apr; 95(4):268-9. PubMed ID: 27058140
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.