122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7629283)
21. [Attendance rate in the Polish Cervical Cancer Screening Program in the years 2007-2009].
Spaczyński M; Karowicz-Bilinska A; Rokita W; Molińska-Glura M; Januszek-Michalecka L; Seroczyński P; Uchlik J; Nowak-Markwitz E
Ginekol Pol; 2010 Sep; 81(9):655-63. PubMed ID: 20973201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Pathways to diagnosis of cervical cancer: screening history, delay in follow up, and smear reading.
Priest P; Sadler L; Peters J; Crengle S; Bethwaite P; Medley G; Jackson R
BJOG; 2007 Apr; 114(4):398-407. PubMed ID: 17166215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Cervical smear histories of 500 women with invasive cervical cancer in Yorkshire.
Paterson ME; Peel KR; Joslin CA
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1984 Oct; 289(6449):896-8. PubMed ID: 6434133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Audit of cervical screening in women with HIV infection in the Auckland and Northland regions of New Zealand.
Grewal J; Lowe M; Gerrard H; Henley R; Perkins N; Briggs S
N Z Med J; 2010 Jul; 123(1319):71-8. PubMed ID: 20717179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Review of cervical smears from 76 women with invasive cervical cancer: cytological findings and medicolegal implications.
Coleman DV; Poznansky JJ
Cytopathology; 2006 Jun; 17(3):127-36. PubMed ID: 16719855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Women's social conditions and their participation in Cervical Cancer Population Screening Program in Poland].
Spaczyński M; Nowak-Markwitz E; Januszek-Michalecka L; Karowicz-Bilińska A
Ginekol Pol; 2009 Nov; 80(11):833-8. PubMed ID: 20088397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Survey of population coverage in cervical cancer screening in the Oxford region.
Coulter A; Baldwin A
J R Coll Gen Pract; 1987 Oct; 37(303):441-3. PubMed ID: 3505283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Cervical cytology in the Vale of Trent faculty of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 1985-8.
Wilson A
BMJ; 1990 Feb; 300(6721):376-8. PubMed ID: 2106993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Estimating the efficacy of screening by auditing smear histories of women with and without cervical cancer. The National Co-ordinating Network for Cervical Screening Working Group.
Sasieni PD; Cuzick J; Lynch-Farmery E
Br J Cancer; 1996 Apr; 73(8):1001-5. PubMed ID: 8611418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Effect of an antepartum Pap smear on the coverage of a cervical cancer screening programme: a population-based prospective study.
Nygård M; Daltveit AK; Thoresen SO; Nygård JF
BMC Health Serv Res; 2007 Jan; 7():10. PubMed ID: 17244348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Audit of practice based cervical smear programme: completion of the cycle.
Creighton PA; Evans AM
BMJ; 1992 Apr; 304(6832):963-6. PubMed ID: 1581721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Evaluation of cervical cancer screening programme in the Harare City Health Department, Zimbabwe.
Moyo IM; Koni NP; Makunike B; Hipshman J; Makaure HK; Gumbo N
Cent Afr J Med; 1997 Aug; 43(8):223-5. PubMed ID: 9431759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Study of the women overdue for a smear test in a general practice cervical screening programme.
Meadows P
J R Coll Gen Pract; 1987 Nov; 37(304):500-3. PubMed ID: 3505643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Improving the effectiveness of cervical cancer screening.
Ellman R; Chamberlain J
J R Coll Gen Pract; 1984 Oct; 34(267):537-42. PubMed ID: 6492026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Implementing the national invasive cervical cancer audit: a local perspective.
Moss EL; Pearmain P; Askew S; Owen G; Reynolds TM; Prabakar IM; Douce G; Parkes J; Menon V; Todd RW; Redman CW
BJOG; 2010 Oct; 117(11):1411-6. PubMed ID: 20716252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Cervical screening in general practice: call and recall.
Ridsdale LL
J R Coll Gen Pract; 1987 Jun; 37(299):257-9. PubMed ID: 3129556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Factors affecting uptake of cervical and breast cancer screening among perimenopausal women in Hong Kong.
Chan C; Ho SC; Chan SG; Yip YB; Wong FC; Cheng F
Hong Kong Med J; 2002 Oct; 8(5):334-41. PubMed ID: 12376710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. False negative rate in cervical cytology.
van der Graaf Y; Vooijs GP
J Clin Pathol; 1987 Apr; 40(4):438-42. PubMed ID: 3584488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The false-negative fraction: a statistical method to measure the efficacy of cervical smear screening laboratories.
Dolinar J; Ollayos CW; Tellado M; Ali I; Stevens A; Paquette C; Brodbelt S
Mil Med; 1999 Jun; 164(6):410-1. PubMed ID: 10377709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Six years' audit of laboratory workload and rates of referral for colposcopy in a cervical screening programme in three districts.
Raffle AE; Alden B; Mackenzie EF
BMJ; 1990 Oct; 301(6757):907-11. PubMed ID: 2261537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
