278 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7629571)
1. [Posterior epidural adipose tissue and the narrow lumbar canal: replacement tissue or cause of impingement?].
Beaujeux R; Dietemann JL; Allal R; Wolfram-Gabel R
J Neuroradiol; 1995 Jun; 22(2):63-70. PubMed ID: 7629571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Polygonal deformation of the dural sac in lumbar epidural lipomatosis: anatomic explanation by the presence of meningovertebral ligaments.
Geers C; Lecouvet FE; Behets C; Malghem J; Cosnard G; Lengelé BG
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2003 Aug; 24(7):1276-82. PubMed ID: 12917112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Congenital lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective, control-matched, cohort radiographic analysis.
Singh K; Samartzis D; Vaccaro AR; Nassr A; Andersson GB; Yoon ST; Phillips FM; Goldberg EJ; An HS
Spine J; 2005; 5(6):615-22. PubMed ID: 16291100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Anatomical background of low back pain: variability and degeneration of the lumbar spinal canal and intervertebral disc].
van Roy P; Barbaix E; Clarijs JP; Mense S
Schmerz; 2001 Dec; 15(6):418-24. PubMed ID: 11793145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Lumbar epidural lipomatosis: the "Y" sign of thecal sac compression.
Kuhn MJ; Youssef HT; Swan TL; Swenson LC
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 1994; 18(5):367-72. PubMed ID: 7954313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Axial loading during magnetic resonance imaging in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis: does it reproduce the positional change of the dural sac detected by upright myelography?
Kanno H; Endo T; Ozawa H; Koizumi Y; Morozumi N; Itoi E; Ishii Y
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Jul; 37(16):E985-92. PubMed ID: 21258271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dimensions of the lumbar spinal canal: variations and correlations with somatometric parameters using CT.
Karantanas AH; Zibis AH; Papaliaga M; Georgiou E; Rousogiannis S
Eur Radiol; 1998; 8(9):1581-5. PubMed ID: 9866765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dural sac cross-sectional area does not correlate with efficacy of percutaneous adhesiolysis in single level lumbar spinal stenosis.
Park CH; Lee SH; Jung JY
Pain Physician; 2011; 14(4):377-82. PubMed ID: 21785481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnostic Importance of Axial Loaded Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Suspected Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis.
Sasani H; Solmaz B; Sasani M; Vural M; Ozer AF
World Neurosurg; 2019 Jul; 127():e69-e75. PubMed ID: 30857995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Neurogenic intermittent claudication in lumbar spinal canal stenosis: the clinical relationship between the local pressure of the intervertebral foramen and the clinical findings in lumbar spinal canal stenosis.
Morishita Y; Hida S; Naito M; Arimizu J; Takamori Y
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Apr; 22(2):130-4. PubMed ID: 19342935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The importance of posterior epidural fat pad in lumbar central canal stenosis.
Herzog RJ; Kaiser JA; Saal JA; Saal JS
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1991 Jun; 16(6 Suppl):S227-33. PubMed ID: 1862417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Digital computed tomography evaluation of spinal canal and dural sac before and after surgical decompression of lumbar stenosis.
Rapała K; Chaberek S; Truszczyńska A; Łukawski S; Walczak P
Ortop Traumatol Rehabil; 2010; 12(2):120-35. PubMed ID: 20453251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Changes in dural sac caliber with standing MRI improve correlation with symptoms of lumbar spinal stenosis.
Lau YYO; Lee RKL; Griffith JF; Chan CLY; Law SW; Kwok KO
Eur Spine J; 2017 Oct; 26(10):2666-2675. PubMed ID: 28702785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dynamic changes in the dural sac of patients with lumbar canal stenosis evaluated by multidetector-row computed tomography after myelography.
Kanbara S; Yukawa Y; Ito K; Machino M; Kato F
Eur Spine J; 2014 Jan; 23(1):74-9. PubMed ID: 23817960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Anatomic radiological variations in developmental lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective, control-matched comparative analysis.
Kitab SA; Alsulaiman AM; Benzel EC
Spine J; 2014 May; 14(5):808-15. PubMed ID: 24314904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The pathomorphology of spinal stenosis as seen on CT scans of the lumbar spine.
Schonstrom NS; Bolender NF; Spengler DM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1985 Nov; 10(9):806-11. PubMed ID: 4089655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Evaluation of lumbar canal stenosis: decubitus imaging methods versus flexion-extension myelography and surface measurements versus the diameter of the dural sac].
Coulier B
JBR-BTR; 2000 Apr; 83(2):61-7. PubMed ID: 10859898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical analysis of two-level compression of the cauda equina and the nerve roots in lumbar spinal canal stenosis.
Sato K; Kikuchi S
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1997 Aug; 22(16):1898-903; discussion 1904. PubMed ID: 9280027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dural sac area is a more sensitive parameter for evaluating lumbar spinal stenosis than spinal canal area: A retrospective study.
Lim YS; Mun JU; Seo MS; Sang BH; Bang YS; Kang KN; Koh JW; Kim YU
Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 Dec; 96(49):e9087. PubMed ID: 29245329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Lumbar epidural lipomatosis].
Dihlmann SW; Mayer HM
Z Rheumatol; 1995; 54(6):417-23. PubMed ID: 8578893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
