These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7630066)

  • 1. Getting through the IRB: Covenant Medical Center Nursing Research Committee's experience.
    Butzow M
    J Emerg Nurs; 1995 Jun; 21(3):262-3. PubMed ID: 7630066
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Research peer review: a committee when none is required.
    Martin PA
    Appl Nurs Res; 1998 May; 11(2):90-2. PubMed ID: 9627436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reviewing peer review: the three reviewers you meet at submission time.
    Clarke SP
    Can J Nurs Res; 2006 Dec; 38(4):5-9. PubMed ID: 17342873
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Critically evaluating research studies.
    Rogers B
    AAOHN J; 1995 Jan; 43(1):54-5. PubMed ID: 7695808
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reviewing and understanding research reports.
    Whitney JD
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 1999 Mar; 26(2):58-9. PubMed ID: 10373860
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Peer review by nursing research committees in hospitals.
    Rempusheski VF; Wolfe BE; Dow KH; Fish LC
    Image J Nurs Sch; 1996; 28(1):51-3. PubMed ID: 8907663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The "so what" question: the impact of nursing research.
    Mitchell PH
    J Prof Nurs; 2004; 20(6):347-8. PubMed ID: 15599866
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Peer review of nursing research proposals.
    Lindquist RD; Tracy MF; Treat-Jacobson D
    Am J Crit Care; 1995 Jan; 4(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 7894558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reviewing a manuscript for publication: how do I do this?
    Koop PP
    Can Oncol Nurs J; 1999; 9(3):107-9. PubMed ID: 10703301
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The art of criticism.
    Parse RR
    Nurs Sci Q; 1998; 11(2):43. PubMed ID: 10036454
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Learning to give and accept research critiques: some unique models.
    Ingram C
    Can Oncol Nurs J; 2000; 10(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 10887858
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Grant reviews: how to do them well.
    Koop PM
    Can Oncol Nurs J; 1999; 9(2):61-3. PubMed ID: 10703294
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Developing critical appraisal skills.
    McCaughan D
    Prof Nurse; 1999 Sep; 14(12):843-7. PubMed ID: 10603895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The critique: a necessary part of scientific inquiry.
    Schmelzer M
    Gastroenterol Nurs; 2006; 29(4):324-5. PubMed ID: 16974173
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Making processes transparent.
    King KM
    Can J Cardiovasc Nurs; 2003; 13(1):31-2. PubMed ID: 12703104
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Receiving feedback from reviewers: how to make the most of criticism.
    Koop PM
    Can Oncol Nurs J; 1999; 9(4):148-50. PubMed ID: 10786470
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Stewards of the discipline: The role of referees and peer review.
    Broome ME
    Nurs Outlook; 2010; 58(4):169-70. PubMed ID: 20637926
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In praise of peer reviewers and the peer review process.
    Peternelj-Taylor C
    J Forensic Nurs; 2010; 6(4):159-61. PubMed ID: 21114756
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Critiquing a research article.
    Giuffre M
    J Perianesth Nurs; 1998 Apr; 13(2):104-8. PubMed ID: 9592451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The introduction of a performance-based system for funding research.
    Smith T
    Nurs Prax N Z; 2006 Mar; 22(1):2-5. PubMed ID: 17205666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.