These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

34 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7632247)

  • 1. Bull selection methods.
    Ehrlich JL
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 1995 Apr; 206(8):1116-7. PubMed ID: 7632247
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The importance of haplotype length and heritability using genomic selection in dairy cattle.
    Villumsen TM; Janss L; Lund MS
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2009 Feb; 126(1):3-13. PubMed ID: 19207924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Application of linear programming in bull selection for a dairy herd.
    Galligan DT; Ferguson JD
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 1995 Jan; 206(2):173-6. PubMed ID: 7751217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Strategy for applying genome-wide selection in dairy cattle.
    Schaeffer LR
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2006 Aug; 123(4):218-23. PubMed ID: 16882088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Combining genetic test information and correlated phenotypic records for breeding value estimation.
    Spangler ML; Bertrand JK; Rekaya R
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Mar; 85(3):641-9. PubMed ID: 17085722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [The genetic selection aspects of the "Holsteinization" of dairy cattle breeding in Ukraine].
    Vinnichuk DT
    Tsitol Genet; 1997; 31(6):63-8. PubMed ID: 9591346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Analysis of beef cattle longitudinal data applying a nonlinear model.
    Forni S; Piles M; Blasco A; Varona L; Oliveira HN; Lôbo RB; Albuquerque LG
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Dec; 85(12):3189-97. PubMed ID: 17644784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy of marker-assisted selection with single markers and marker haplotypes in cattle.
    Hayes BJ; Chamberlain AJ; McPartlan H; Macleod I; Sethuraman L; Goddard ME
    Genet Res; 2007 Aug; 89(4):215-20. PubMed ID: 18208627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Genetic change results from selection on an economic breeding objective in beef cattle.
    Enns RM; Nicoll GB
    J Anim Sci; 2008 Dec; 86(12):3348-57. PubMed ID: 18469047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Technical note: prediction of breeding values using marker-derived relationship matrices.
    Hayes BJ; Goddard ME
    J Anim Sci; 2008 Sep; 86(9):2089-92. PubMed ID: 18407982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A general review of competition genetic effects with an emphasis on swine breeding.
    Chen CY; Johnson RK; Newman S; Van Vleck LD
    Genet Mol Res; 2007 Sep; 6(3):594-606. PubMed ID: 18050078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [The genotypic evaluation of bulls for the milk productivity of their daughters].
    Polupan IuP
    Tsitol Genet; 1995; 29(4):47-54. PubMed ID: 8604527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of methods for computing approximate accuracies of predicted breeding values in maternal random regression models for growth traits in beef cattle.
    Sánchez JP; Misztal I; Bertrand JK
    J Anim Sci; 2008 May; 86(5):1057-66. PubMed ID: 18203980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of direct and indirect selection criteria for efficiency of gain on profitability of Japanese Black cattle selection strategies.
    Kahi AK; Hirooka H
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Oct; 85(10):2401-12. PubMed ID: 17565064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [The selection-genetic aspects of sex dimorphism in cattle].
    Vinnichuk DT
    Tsitol Genet; 1994; 28(5):70-3. PubMed ID: 7900200
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Illustration of the maternal animal model used for genetic evaluation of beef cattle.
    Crews DH; Wang Z
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Jul; 85(7):1842-8. PubMed ID: 17371795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Genetic trend and environmental effects in a population of cattle selected for twinning.
    Van Vleck LD; Gregory KE
    J Anim Sci; 1996 Mar; 74(3):522-8. PubMed ID: 8707705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prediction of response to marker-assisted and genomic selection using selection index theory.
    Dekkers JC
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2007 Dec; 124(6):331-41. PubMed ID: 18076470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of the GnRH test results of beef-type breeding bull candidates.
    Tözsér J; Mézes M; Szakács Z
    Acta Vet Hung; 1996; 44(3):269-75. PubMed ID: 9055452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A dynamic deterministic model to optimize a multiple-trait selection scheme.
    Costard AD; Vitezica ZG; Moreno CR; Elsen JM
    J Anim Sci; 2009 Mar; 87(3):885-94. PubMed ID: 19028846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 2.