These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7632347)

  • 1. Proposed semi-analytical formulae for the determination of (L/rho)medair and Prepl for electron beams as used in radiotherapy.
    Strydom WJ; Korf GJ
    Med Dosim; 1995; 20(2):135-8. PubMed ID: 7632347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Semianalytical expressions for (L/rho)(air)med and P(repl) for electron beams.
    Wielopolski L; Pai S; Mlyn M
    Med Phys; 1991; 18(3):559-64. PubMed ID: 1908048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sci-Fri PM: Planning-10: The replacement correction factors for cylindrical chambers in megavoltage beams.
    Wang L; Rogers D
    Med Phys; 2008 Jul; 35(7Part3):3414. PubMed ID: 28512897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Replacement correction factors for cylindrical ion chambers in electron beams.
    Wang LL; Rogers DW
    Med Phys; 2009 Oct; 36(10):4600-8. PubMed ID: 19928091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of the IAEA TRS-398 and AAPM TG-51 absorbed dose to water protocols in the dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams.
    Huq MS; Andreo P; Song H
    Phys Med Biol; 2001 Nov; 46(11):2985-3006. PubMed ID: 11720359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On the selection of stopping-power and mass energy-absorption coefficient ratios for high-energy x-ray dosimetry.
    Cunningham JR; Schulz RJ
    Med Phys; 1984; 11(5):618-23. PubMed ID: 6503876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Measurement of Prepl Pwall factors in electron beams and in a 60Co beam for plane-parallel chambers.
    Ding GX; Cygler JE
    Med Phys; 1998 Aug; 25(8):1453-7. PubMed ID: 9725133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of IAEA 1987 and AAPM 1983 protocols for dosimetry calibration of radiotherapy beams.
    Huq MS; Nath R
    Med Phys; 1991; 18(1):26-35. PubMed ID: 1901129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Monte Carlo calculations of correction factors for plane-parallel ionization chambers in clinical electron dosimetry.
    Araki F
    Med Phys; 2008 Sep; 35(9):4033-40. PubMed ID: 18841855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reference dosimetry in clinical high-energy electron beams: comparison of the AAPM TG-51 and AAPM TG-21 dosimetry protocols.
    Saiful Huq M; Song H; Andreo P; Houser CJ
    Med Phys; 2001 Oct; 28(10):2077-87. PubMed ID: 11695769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Calculated absorbed-dose ratios, TG51/TG21, for most widely used cylindrical and parallel-plate ion chambers over a range of photon and electron energies.
    Tailor RC; Hanson WF
    Med Phys; 2002 Jul; 29(7):1464-72. PubMed ID: 12148727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Possibility of using cylindrical ionization chambers for percent depth-dose measurements in clinical electron beams.
    Ono T; Araki F; Yoshiyama F
    Med Phys; 2011 Aug; 38(8):4647-54. PubMed ID: 21928637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fluence correction factors in plastic phantoms for clinical proton beams.
    Palmans H; Symons JE; Denis JM; de Kock EA; Jones DT; Vynckier S
    Phys Med Biol; 2002 Sep; 47(17):3055-71. PubMed ID: 12361210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The advantages of absorbed-dose calibration factors.
    Rogers DW
    Med Phys; 1992; 19(5):1227-39. PubMed ID: 1435604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Recommendations for clinical electron beam dosimetry: supplement to the recommendations of Task Group 25.
    Gerbi BJ; Antolak JA; Deibel FC; Followill DS; Herman MG; Higgins PD; Huq MS; Mihailidis DN; Yorke ED; Hogstrom KR; Khan FM
    Med Phys; 2009 Jul; 36(7):3239-79. PubMed ID: 19673223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of high-energy photon and electron dosimetry for various dosimetry protocols.
    Araki F; Kubo HD
    Med Phys; 2002 May; 29(5):857-68. PubMed ID: 12033582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The IPEM code of practice for electron dosimetry for radiotherapy beams of initial energy from 4 to 25 MeV based on an absorbed dose to water calibration.
    Thwaites DI; DuSautoy AR; Jordan T; McEwen MR; Nisbet A; Nahum AE; Pitchford WG;
    Phys Med Biol; 2003 Sep; 48(18):2929-70. PubMed ID: 14529204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparing calibration methods of electron beams using plane-parallel chambers with absorbed-dose to water based protocols.
    Stewart KJ; Seuntjens JP
    Med Phys; 2002 Mar; 29(3):284-9. PubMed ID: 11929010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Calibration of low-energy electron beams from a mobile linear accelerator with plane-parallel chambers using both TG-51 and TG-21 protocols.
    Beddar AS; Tailor RC
    Phys Med Biol; 2004 Apr; 49(8):N105-10. PubMed ID: 15152696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Determination of relative ion chamber calibration coefficients from depth-ionization measurements in clinical electron beams.
    Muir BR; McEwen MR; Rogers DW
    Phys Med Biol; 2014 Oct; 59(19):5953-69. PubMed ID: 25211012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.