These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7634721)

  • 21. [Distribution of haversian remodeling in the human femur by an osteon count. A study of 6 femurs in cadavers].
    Nyssen-Behets C; Dhem A
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 1987; 73(3):153-6. PubMed ID: 3616002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Fit-and-fill analysis of trochanteric gamma nail for the Thai proximal femur: a virtual simulation study.
    Mahaisavariya B; Sitthiseripratip K; Oris P; Chaichanasiri E; Suwanprateeb J
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2004 Nov; 87(11):1315-20. PubMed ID: 15825706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Sex-specific developmental changes in muscle size and bone geometry at the femoral shaft.
    Högler W; Blimkie CJ; Cowell CT; Inglis D; Rauch F; Kemp AF; Wiebe P; Duncan CS; Farpour-Lambert N; Woodhead HJ
    Bone; 2008 May; 42(5):982-9. PubMed ID: 18337201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Gender differences in the distal femur dimensions and variation patterns in relation to TKA component sizing.
    Rosenstein AD; Veazey B; Shephard D; Xu KT
    Orthopedics; 2008 Jul; 31(7):652. PubMed ID: 19292386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Another look at shape variation in the distal femur of Australopithecus afarensis: implications for taxonomic and functional diversity at Hadar.
    Lague MR
    J Hum Evol; 2002 May; 42(5):609-26. PubMed ID: 11969299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The Morphology of the Proximal Femoral Canal Continues to Change in the Very Elderly: Implications for Total Hip Arthroplasty.
    Boymans TA; Heyligers IC; Grimm B
    J Arthroplasty; 2015 Dec; 30(12):2328-32. PubMed ID: 26187385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Measurement of femoral head diameter: a clinical study].
    Bartoska R
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Apr; 76(2):133-6. PubMed ID: 19439134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Is the canal flare index a reliable means of estimation of canal shape? Measurement of proximal femoral geometry by use of 3D models of the femur.
    Tawada K; Iguchi H; Tanaka N; Watanabe N; Murakami S; Hasegawa S; Otsuka T
    J Orthop Sci; 2015 May; 20(3):498-506. PubMed ID: 25740729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. An in vitro comparison of surface strain patterns in cementless femoral arthroplasty.
    Boggan RS
    Semin Arthroplasty; 1993 Jul; 4(3):143-53. PubMed ID: 10146280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The effect of implant overlap on the mechanical properties of the femur.
    Harris T; Ruth JT; Szivek J; Haywood B
    J Trauma; 2003 May; 54(5):930-5. PubMed ID: 12777906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Prediction of the femoral neck-shaft angle from the length of the femoral neck.
    Isaac B; Vettivel S; Prasad R; Jeyaseelan L; Chandi G
    Clin Anat; 1997; 10(5):318-23. PubMed ID: 9283729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Reconstruction of femur length from markers of its proximal end.
    Prasad R; Vettivel S; Jeyaseelan L; Isaac B; Chandi G
    Clin Anat; 1996; 9(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 8838277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Computerized morphometric analysis of the femoral diaphyseal canal.
    Toni A; Fabbri F; Scimeca GB; Zanotti Russo MC; Baruffaldi F; Cianci R; Giunti A
    Chir Organi Mov; 1995; 80(2):207-19. PubMed ID: 7587522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Dimensions of the lateral condyle in non-arthritic valgus knees. A cadaver study].
    Brilhault J; Preyssas P; Favard L; Burdin P
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2002 Nov; 88(7):686-90. PubMed ID: 12457114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [The significance of individual patient characteristics for loading capacity and deformation of the proximal end of the femur].
    Friedl W; Krebs H
    Unfallchirurg; 1990 Aug; 93(8):364-71. PubMed ID: 2392688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Determination of Hounsfield value for CT-based design of custom femoral stems.
    Aamodt A; Kvistad KA; Andersen E; Lund-Larsen J; Eine J; Benum P; Husby OS
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1999 Jan; 81(1):143-7. PubMed ID: 10068022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Size and shape variation in Australopithecus afarensis proximal femora.
    Harmon EH
    J Hum Evol; 2006 Sep; 51(3):217-27. PubMed ID: 16712903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The upper end of the femur: dimensions of the endosteal canal.
    Fessy MH; Bejui J; Fischer LP; Bouchet A
    Surg Radiol Anat; 1995; 17(2):155-60, 21-3. PubMed ID: 7482154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Sagittal bowing of the distal femur in Chinese patients who require total knee arthroplasty.
    Tang WM; Chiu KY; Kwan MF; Ng TP; Yau WP
    J Orthop Res; 2005 Jan; 23(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 15607873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The intercondylar fossa indices of male and female dog femora.
    Kara ME; Sevil Kilimci F; Yildirim IG; Onar V; Pazvant G
    Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol; 2011; 24(3):211-4. PubMed ID: 21327292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.