These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7634760)

  • 1. Resolving attachment ambiguities with multiple constraints.
    Spivey-Knowlton M; Sedivy JC
    Cognition; 1995 Jun; 55(3):227-67. PubMed ID: 7634760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Context effects in syntactic ambiguity resolution: discourse and semantic influences in parsing reduced relative clauses.
    Spivey-Knowlton MJ; Trueswell JC; Tanenhaus MK
    Can J Exp Psychol; 1993 Jun; 47(2):276-309. PubMed ID: 8364532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Verb-specific constraints in sentence processing: separating effects of lexical preference from garden-paths.
    Trueswell JC; Tanenhaus MK; Kello C
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1993 May; 19(3):528-53. PubMed ID: 8501429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Working memory constraints on the processing of syntactic ambiguity.
    MacDonald MC; Just MA; Carpenter PA
    Cogn Psychol; 1992 Jan; 24(1):56-98. PubMed ID: 1537232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Syntactic ambiguity resolution in discourse: modeling the effects of referential context and lexical frequency.
    Spivey MJ; Tanenhaus MK
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1998 Nov; 24(6):1521-43. PubMed ID: 9835064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Discourse influences during parsing are delayed.
    Rayner K; Garrod S; Perfetti CA
    Cognition; 1992 Nov; 45(2):109-39. PubMed ID: 1451412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Limitations on the use of verb information during sentence comprehension.
    Kennison SM
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2001 Mar; 8(1):132-8. PubMed ID: 11340858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Priming prepositional-phrase attachment during comprehension.
    Branigan HP; Pickering MJ; McLean JF
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 May; 31(3):468-481. PubMed ID: 15910131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Use of verb information in syntactic parsing: evidence from eye movements and word-by-word self-paced reading.
    Ferreira F; Henderson JM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1990 Jul; 16(4):555-68. PubMed ID: 2142952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The role of pragmatic principles in resolving attachment ambiguities: evidence from eye movements.
    Traxler MJ; Frazier L
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Mar; 36(2):314-28. PubMed ID: 18426063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The processing role of structural constraints on the interpretation of pronouns and anaphors.
    Badecker W; Straub K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Jul; 28(4):748-69. PubMed ID: 12109766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cross-structural priming: prepositional phrase attachment primes relative clause attachment.
    Loncke M; Van Laere SM; Desmet T
    Exp Psychol; 2011; 58(3):227-34. PubMed ID: 21106469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Thematic roles in sentence parsing.
    Clifton C
    Can J Exp Psychol; 1993 Jun; 47(2):222-46. PubMed ID: 8364531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Linguistic rhythm guides parsing decisions in written sentence comprehension.
    Kentner G
    Cognition; 2012 Apr; 123(1):1-20. PubMed ID: 22217385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The developing constraints on parsing decisions: the role of lexical-biases and referential scenes in child and adult sentence processing.
    Snedeker J; Trueswell JC
    Cogn Psychol; 2004 Nov; 49(3):238-99. PubMed ID: 15342261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In defense of competition during syntactic ambiguity resolution.
    Vosse T; Kempen G
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2009 Feb; 38(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 18521754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ambiguity in the brain: what brain imaging reveals about the processing of syntactically ambiguous sentences.
    Mason RA; Just MA; Keller TA; Carpenter PA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Nov; 29(6):1319-38. PubMed ID: 14622064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. When language comprehension reflects production constraints: resolving ambiguities with the help of past experience.
    MacDonald MC; Thornton R
    Mem Cognit; 2009 Dec; 37(8):1177-86. PubMed ID: 19933460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The influence of semantic fit on on-line sentence processing.
    Schmauder AR; Egan MC
    Mem Cognit; 1998 Nov; 26(6):1304-12. PubMed ID: 9847553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Online processing of sentences containing noun modification in young children with high-functioning autism.
    Bavin EL; Prendergast LA; Kidd E; Baker E; Dissanayake C
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2016 Mar; 51(2):137-47. PubMed ID: 26215207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.