90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7635324)
1. [Prospects for using the SOS-Chromotest for predicting carcinogenic activity of chemical compounds].
Koreshkova SV; Tanirbergenov TB; Tarasov VA
Genetika; 1995 Jun; 31(6):861-4. PubMed ID: 7635324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Efficiency of evaluating the carcinogenicity of chemical substances in short-term tests and the SAR model].
Tarasov VA; Tsarenko NA; Mel'nik VA; Mustafaev ON; Makedonov GP; Tarasov AV
Genetika; 2009 Dec; 45(12):1674-84. PubMed ID: 20198980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. SOS chromotest results in a broader context: empirical relationships between genotoxic potency, mutagenic potency, and carcinogenic potency.
White PA; Rasmussen JB
Environ Mol Mutagen; 1996; 27(4):270-305. PubMed ID: 8665872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [The mutagenicity of organic microcontaminants in the environment. IV. The mutagenicity of volatile organic halogens in the SOS-chromotest].
Mersch-Sundermann V; Müller G; Hofmeister A
Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed; 1989 Dec; 189(3):266-71. PubMed ID: 2697208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The SOS chromotest: a review.
Quillardet P; Hofnung M
Mutat Res; 1993 Oct; 297(3):235-79. PubMed ID: 7692273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [The genotoxicity of air particles tested by SOS chromotest].
Lei XF; Xing Q
Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1993 May; 27(3):141-3. PubMed ID: 8243174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A new highly specific method for predicting the carcinogenic potential of pharmaceuticals in rodents using enhanced MCASE QSAR-ES software.
Matthews EJ; Contrera JF
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1998 Dec; 28(3):242-64. PubMed ID: 10049796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Genotoxic activity of 3-[3-phenyl-1,2,4-oxadiazol-5-yl] propionic acid and its peptidyl derivatives determined by Ames and SOS response tests.
Leite AC; Vieira RF; de M Moreira DR; Brondani DJ; Srivastava RM; da Silva VF; de Morais Júnior MA
Mutat Res; 2005 Dec; 588(2):166-71. PubMed ID: 16325458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The results of assays in Drosophila as indicators of exposure to carcinogens.
Vogel EW; Graf U; Frei HJ; Nivard MM
IARC Sci Publ; 1999; (146):427-70. PubMed ID: 10353398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Computer-aided rodent carcinogenicity prediction.
Lagunin AA; Dearden JC; Filimonov DA; Poroikov VV
Mutat Res; 2005 Oct; 586(2):138-46. PubMed ID: 16112600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. SOS chromotest, a quantitative short-term bacterial assay for the detection of genotoxic compounds in an automated version adapted to Bioscreen Analyzer System.
Janz S; Wolff G; Storch H
Zentralbl Mikrobiol; 1988; 143(8):645-9. PubMed ID: 3149098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Efficiency of the prediction of carcinogenic activities of chemical substances based on scoring somatic mutations in the soybean Glycine max (L.) Merrill].
Bittueva MM; Abilev SK; Tarasov VA
Genetika; 2007 Jan; 43(1):78-87. PubMed ID: 17333942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. SOS chromotest and mutagenicity in Salmonella: evidence for mechanistic differences.
Rosenkranz HS; Mersch-Sundermann V; Klopman G
Mutat Res; 1999 Dec; 431(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 10656484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens II. Further analysis of mammalian cell results, relative predictivity and tumour profiles.
Kirkland D; Aardema M; Müller L; Makoto H
Mutat Res; 2006 Sep; 608(1):29-42. PubMed ID: 16769241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens I. Sensitivity, specificity and relative predictivity.
Kirkland D; Aardema M; Henderson L; Müller L
Mutat Res; 2005 Jul; 584(1-2):1-256. PubMed ID: 15979392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Solution of genetic problems of ecology using the automated system "Bioscreen C" (SOS-Chromotest program)].
Vasil'eva SV; Iskandarova KA
Antibiot Khimioter; 1990 Sep; 35(9):30-3. PubMed ID: 2275588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Detection of hospital wastewater genotoxicity with the SOS chromotest and Ames fluctuation test.
Jolibois B; Guerbet M; Vassal S
Chemosphere; 2003 May; 51(6):539-43. PubMed ID: 12615107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Determination of the genotoxicity of fullerene C60 and fullerol using the method of somatic mosaics on cells of Drosophila melanogaster wing and SOS-chromotest].
Zakharenko LP; Zakharov IK; Vasiunina EA; Karamysheva TV; Danilenko AM; Nikiforov AA
Genetika; 1997 Mar; 33(3):405-9. PubMed ID: 9244774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Genotoxic and mutagenic activity of antineoplastic anthracyclines and their aglycones: study in two test-systems].
Vasil'eva SV; Makhova EV; Efremenkova OV; Bartoshevich IuE
Genetika; 1996 Feb; 32(2):233-9. PubMed ID: 8713623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of the Salmonella umu test with 83 NTP chemicals.
Yasunaga K; Kiyonari A; Oikawa T; Abe N; Yoshikawa K
Environ Mol Mutagen; 2004; 44(4):329-45. PubMed ID: 15476194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
