These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Ensuring the comparability of comparison groups: is randomization enough? Berger VW; Weinstein S Control Clin Trials; 2004 Oct; 25(5):515-24. PubMed ID: 15465620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Development of the methodology of therapeutic trials. A study of papers published in Ugeskrift for Laeger during the period 1910-2000]. Andersen L Ugeskr Laeger; 2005 Feb; 167(9):1034-8. PubMed ID: 15804000 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Rank minimization with a two-step analysis should not replace randomization in clinical trials. Morris T J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Jul; 65(7):810-1. PubMed ID: 22564502 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Reply to correspondence on randomization in surgical studies. Grunkemeier GL; Starr A J Heart Valve Dis; 1993 May; 2(3):359-61. PubMed ID: 8269134 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of risk of bias in randomized clinical trials in surgery. Gurusamy KS; Gluud C; Nikolova D; Davidson BR Br J Surg; 2009 Apr; 96(4):342-9. PubMed ID: 19283747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessing the validity of clinical trials. Akobeng AK J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr; 2008 Sep; 47(3):277-82. PubMed ID: 18728521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Therapeutic evaluation and the level of proof]. Cucherat M Rev Prat; 2008 Apr; 58(7):789-93. PubMed ID: 18546654 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A step-by-step approach to the evaluation of clinical studies with therapeutic or preventive objectives. Vergara CM; Wang F Conn Med; 2003 Apr; 67(4):195-203. PubMed ID: 12760079 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. CONSORT statement on the reporting standards of clinical trials. Reporting of refusal of consent to take part in clinical trials is still poor. Bromhead HJ; Goodman NW BMJ; 1997 Apr; 314(7087):1126-7. PubMed ID: 9133903 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of randomized controlled trials. Stanley K Circulation; 2007 Apr; 115(13):1819-22. PubMed ID: 17404173 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Methodological issues of randomized controlled trials for the evaluation of reproductive health interventions. Villar J; Carroli G Prev Med; 1996; 25(3):365-75. PubMed ID: 8781015 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Control of selection bias in parallel-group controlled clinical trials in dogs and cats: 97 trials (2000-2005). Brown DC J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2006 Sep; 229(6):990-3. PubMed ID: 16978121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quality control in data monitoring of clinical trials. De Pauw M Acta Urol Belg; 1994 Apr; 62(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 8197927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Can non-randomized trials be considered to be equivalent to randomized trials in forensic mental health? Leese M Crim Behav Ment Health; 2005; 15(2):121-2. PubMed ID: 16470506 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Studies should be controlled, randomized, and blinded. Parker RA Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2009 May; 85(5):461-3. PubMed ID: 19381148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Randomized clinical trials in the Ugeskrift for Laeger 1948-1995]. Gøtzsche PC; Jensen KL; Hammarquist C Ugeskr Laeger; 1997 Jul; 159(31):4762-5. PubMed ID: 9265328 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]